Background and Study Aims: Endoscopic identification of dysplasia and early carcinoma of the esophagus is difficult
and is currently done through random pinch biopsies. This study assesses the potential
of ultraviolet-induced autofluorescence spectroscopy for early diagnosis with special
focus on Barrett's esophagus.
Patients and Methods: Measurements were performed on 24 patients using 330 nm light excitation. The determination
of the spectral distribution typical of each histological tissue type was done using
three fluorescence intensity ratios: R1 = I390nm/I450nm; R2 = I550nm/I450nm; R3 = I390nm/I550nm.
Results: The spectral distribution of normal esophageal mucosa and specialized columnar Barrett's
mucosa were similar. A strong modification of the spectral distribution was observed
for high grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma. Statistical analysis indicated
that the spectral shape modification associated with neoplastic transformation was
greater than intra- and interpatient spectral variations. These results allow the
determination of discriminating criteria based on ratios R1 and R3. Using ratio R3, the spectroscopy-based diagnosis differentiated neoplastic tissue from normal esophageal
mucosa and specialized columnar Barrett's mucosa with a sensitivity and specificity
of 86 % and 95 %, respectively.
Conclusions: The use of ultraviolet autofluorescence spectroscopy should improve the diagnostic
yield of standard endoscopy in patients with Barrett's esophagus.
Résumé
Contexte et objectifs de l'étude: L'identification endoscopique des dysplasies et des carcinomes précoces de l'oesophage
est difficile et effectuée au moyen de biopsies étagées systématiques. Cette étude
évalue la capacité de la spectroscopie d'autofluorescence UV à détecter ces lésions
précoces avec un intérêt particulier pour l'endobrachyoesophage (EBO).
Patients et méthodes: Les mesures ont porté sur 24 patients en utilisant une excitation lumineuse à 330
nm. La détermination de la distribution spectrale caractéristique de chaque type histologique
est faite en utilisant les trois rapports d'intensité de fluorescence. R1 = I390nm/I450nm; R2 = I550nm/ I450nm; R3 = I390nm/I550nm.
Résultats: Les distributions spectrales relatives à la muqueuse malpighienne oesophagienne saine
et à la muqueuse spécialisée de l'EBO non dysplasique sont similaires. La présence
d'une dysplasie de haut grade ou d'un carcinome intramuqueux se traduit par une modification
de la distribution spectrale. L'analyse statistique montre que la modification spectrale
associée à la transformation néoplasique est plus forte que les variations intra-
et interpatients. Ces résultats ont permis la détermination de critères de discrimination
fondés sur les rapports R1 et R3. L'utilisation du rapport R3 permet de différencier le tissue néoplasique de la muqueuse malpighienne et de la
muqueuse de Barrett avec une sensibilité de 86% et une spécificité de 95%.
Conclusion: La spectroscopie d'autofluorescence UV, en orientant les biopsies, devrait accroître
l'efficacité diagnostique de l'endoscopie conventionnelle.
References
- 1
Pera M, Cameron A, Trasteck V, et al.
Increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction.
Gastroenterology.
1993;
104
510-513
- 2
Hansson L, Sparen P, Nyren O.
Increasing incidence of both major histological types of oesophageal carcinomas among
men in Sweden.
Int J Cancer.
1993;
54
402-407
- 3
Cameron A J, Ott B J, Payne W S.
The incidence of adenocarcinoma in columnar-lined (Barrett's) esophagus.
N Engl J Med.
1985;
313
857-859
- 4
Hameeteman W, Tytgat G NJ, Houthoff H J, Ven Den Tweel J G.
Barrett's esophagus: development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma.
Gastroenterology.
1989;
96
1249-1256
- 5
Skinner D, Walther B, Riddell R, et al.
Barrett's esophagus: comparison of benign and malignant cases.
Ann Surg.
1983;
198
554-566
- 6
Sjögren R, Johnsson L.
Barrett's oesophagus: a review.
Am J Med.
1983;
74
313-320
- 7
Schomacker K T, Frisoli J K, Compton C C, et al.
Ultraviolet laser-induced fluorescence of colonic tissue: basic biology and diagnostic
potential.
Lasers Surg Med.
1992;
12
63-78
- 8
Schomacker K T, Frisoli J K, Compton C C, et al.
Ultraviolet laser-induced fluorescence of colonic polyps.
Gastroenterology.
1992;
102
1155-1160
- 9
Lam S, Mc Aulay C, Hung J, et al.
Detection of dysplasia and carcinoma in situ with a lung imaging fluorescence endoscope
device.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1993;
105
1035-1040
- 10
Anidjar M, Ettori D, Cussenot O, et al.
Laser-induced autofluorescence diagnosis of bladder tumors: dependence on the excitation
wavelength.
J Urol.
1996;
156
1590-1596
- 11
Koenig F, McGovern F J, Althausen A F, et al.
Laser-induced autofluorescence diagnosis of bladder cancer.
J Urol.
1996;
156
1597-1601
- 12
Ramanujam N, Follen Mitchell M, Mahadevan A, et al.
Fluorescence spectroscopy: a diagnostic tool for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Gynecol Oncol.
1994;
52
31-38
- 13
Richards-Kortum R, Follen Mitchell M, Ramanujam N, et al.
In vivo fluorescence spectroscopy: potential for non-invasive, automated diagnosis
of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and use as a surrogate endpoint biomarker.
J Cellul Biochem.
1994;
19
111-119
- 14
Dhingra J K, Perrault D F, McMillan K, et al.
Early diagnosis of upper aerodigestive tract cancer by autofluorescence.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1996;
122
1181-1186
- 15
Panjehpour M, Overholt B F, Schmidhammer J L, et al.
Spectroscopic diagnosis of esophageal cancer: new classification model, improved measurement
system.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1995;
41
577-581
- 16
Vo-Dinh T, Panjehpour M, Overholt B F, et al.
In vivo cancer diagnosis of the esophagus using differential normalized fluorescence
(DNF) indices.
Lasers Surg Med.
1995;
16
41-47
- 17
Panjehpour M, Overholt B F, Vo-Dinh T, et al.
Endoscopic fluorescence detection of high grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.
Gastroenterology.
1996;
111
93-101
- 18
Lam S, Kennedy T, Unger M, et al.
Localization of bronchial intraepithelial neoplastic lesions by fluorescence bronchoscopy.
Chest.
1998;
113
696-702
- 19
Kurie J M, Lee J S, Morice R C, et al.
Autofluorescence bronchoscopy in the detection of squamous metaplasia and dysplasia
in current and former smokers.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
1998;
90
991-995
- 20
Brand S, Stepp H, Ochsenkühn T, et al.
Detection of colonic dysplasia by light-induced fluorescence endoscopy: a pilot study.
Int J Colorect Dis.
1999;
14
63-68
- 21
DuVall G A, Saidi R, Kost J, et al.
Real time induced fluorescence endoscopy (LIFE) in the gastrointestinal tract.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1997;
45
AB28
- 22
Haringsma J, Tytgat G NJ.
Detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus using light-induced fluorescence endoscopy.
Endoscopy.
1997;
29
E35
- 23
Haringsma J, van Ierland-van Leeuwen M, Tytgat G NJ.
Localization of dysplasia using real-time light-induced fluorescence endoscopy.
Endoscopy.
1997;
29
E35
- 24 A'Amar O, Lignon D, Menard O, et al.
Autofluorescence spectroscopy of normal and malignant tissues: both in vivo and ex
vivo measurements in the upper aero-digestive tract and lung tissues. SPIE: Advances in Laser and Light Spectroscopy to Diagnose Cancers and Other Diseases
III. Optical Biopsy 1996 2679: 42-50
- 25
Bays R, Wagnières G, Robert D, Braichotte D, et al.
Light dosimetry for photodynamic therapy in the esophagus.
Lasers Surg Med.
1997;
20
290-303
- 26 Goldman H.
Gastro-intestinal mucosal biopsy. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone, 1996: 24-29
- 27
Flejou J F.
Dysplasie sur endobrachyoesophage. Problèmes diagnostiques et conduite à tenir.
Ann Pathol.
1998;
18
101-104
- 28
Van den Boogert J, van Hillegersberg R, De Bruin R WF, et al.
Barrett's oesophagus: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
1998;
33
449-453
G. Bourg-Heckly
Laboratoire de Physicochimie Biomoléculaire et Cellulaire Université Pierre et Marie
Curie
CNRS ESA 7033
Tour 22, Case 138
4, place Jussieu
75252 Paris Cedex 05
France
Fax: Fax:+ 33-1-44277560
eMail: E-mail:bourghec@lpbc.jussieu.fr