Int J Sports Med 2000; 21(7): 505-512
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-7420
Training and Testing
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Physiological Response to Professional Road Cycling: Climbers vs. Time Trialists

A. Lucía1 , H. Joyos2 , J. L. Chicharro3
  • 1 Departamento de Ciencias Morfológicas y Fisiología, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Spain
  • 2 Asociación Deportiva Banesto, Spain
  • 3 Departamento de Enfermería, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

Preview

The purpose of this study was to identify possible physiological differences between professional cyclists who show best performance in hill climbing (“climbers”) and those who excel in time trials (“time trialists”). To this end, professional, top-level climbers (C; n = 8; age 26 ± 1 yr; height 176.0 ± 2.0 cm; body mass 63.6 ± 2.2kg) and time trialists (TT; n=6; 27 ± 1yr; height 181.6 ± 1.7 cm; body mass 72.3 ± 2.3 kg) were required to perform two laboratory exercise tests on a cycle ergometer: a) a maximal exercise test (ramp protocol) and b) a constant load test of 20-min duration at ∼ 80 % of VšO2max. Capillary blood lactate concentration and several gas exchange variables were measured during the maximal tests while determinations made during the submaximal tests also included: pH and bicarbonate concentration [HCO3 --] in venous blood, and electromyographic (EMG) recordings from the vastus lateralis muscle to estimate root mean square voltage (rms-EMG) and mean power frequency (MPF). Both the maximal lactate concentration in capillary blood and VšO2max were greater (p < 0.05) in C than in TT (6.6 ± 0.9 mM vs. 5.0 ± 0.4 mM, respectively, and 78.4 ± 3.2 ml ×kg--1 × min--1 vs. 70.5 ± 2.4 ml × kg--1 × min--1, respectively). Higher mean venous blood pH and [HCO3 --] (p < 0.05), rms-EMG (p < 0.01) and MPF (p < 0.05 at 10 and 15 min of exercise and p < 0.01 at 5 and 20 min) were recorded in C throughout the submaximal tests. Our findings suggest that in top-level professional cyclists, climbing performance is mainly related to physiological factors (VšO2max normalized for body mass, anaerobic/buffer capacity, motor unit recruitment) whereas time trialists tend to achieve greater absolute power outputs. It would also seem that other “technical” requirements of the sport (i. e. pedaling efficiency probably related to biomechanical factors etc.) may be associated with successful time trial performance.

References

Alejandro Lucía,M.D., Ph.D. 

Departamento de Ciencias Morfológicas y Fisiología (Edificio A, Despacho 330) Universidad Europea de Madrid

28670 Villaviciosa de Odón Madrid Spain

Fax: Fax:+ 34 (91) 6168265

Email: E-mail:alejandro.lucia@mrfs.cisa.uem.es