Background and Study Aims: A clean colon is essential for an efficient examination.
The aim of this study was to compare a novel low-dose, low volume triple regimen with
Fleet Phospho-soda.
Methods: A blinded, experienced colonoscopist examined 132 consecutive patients randomly
allocated to receive either a triple regimen consisting of senna syrup (sennoside
B), Picolax (sodium picosulphate), and Klean Prep (polyethylene glycol 3350), or Fleet
Phospho-soda (sodium dihydrogen phosphate and disodium phosphate dodecahydrate). The
colonoscopist recorded cleanliness according to a scoring system (1 - very clean to
4 - solid stools), and time taken to reach the caecum.
Results: In the triple regimen group (n = 81), 73 % scored 1 or 2 compared with 57
% in the Fleet Phospho-soda group (n = 51, p = 0.037 Mann-Whitney U-test). Examination
to caecum was achieved in 95 % of the triple regimen group and 89 % of the Fleet Phospho-soda
group. Among those examined as far as the caecum, the time to reach the caecum was
11 minutes (range 5 - 50) in the triple regimen group compared with 16 minutes (range
5 - 65) in the Fleet Phospho-soda group (p = 0.08, Mann-Whitney U-test). Patient tolerability
was not assessed in this study.
Conclusions: This novel triple regimen produces a cleaner colon than Fleet Phospho-soda,
is associated with a trend towards a quicker and more efficient colonic examination,
and is also 30 % cheaper per patient.
References
1
Davis G R, Santa Ana C A, Morawski S G, Fordtran J S.
Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption
or secretion.
Gastroenterology.
1980;
78
991-995
2
Fordtran J S, Santa Ana C A, Cleveland M VB.
A low-sodium solution for gastrointestinal lavage.
Gastroenterology.
1990;
98
11-16
3
Di Palma J A, Brady C E, Pierson W P.
Colon cleansing acceptance by older patients.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1986;
81
652-655
4
Cohen S M, Wexner S D, Binderow S R, et al.
A prospective randomised endoscopic-blinded trial comparing pre-colonoscopy bowel
cleansing methods.
Dis Colon Rectum.
1994;
37
689-696
5
Yohioka K, Bates J, Morton D, Keighley M RB.
Randomised trial of oral sodium posphate compared with oral sodium picosulphate in
preparation of the colon for colonoscopy.
Gut.
1997;
40 (suppl. 1)
40
6
Vanner S J, MacDonald P H, Paterson W G, et al.
A randomised, prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene
glycol lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonsocopy.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1990;
85
422-427
7
Kolts B E, Lyles W E, Achem S R, et al.
Comparison of the effectiveness and patients tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor
oil and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1993;
88
1212-1223
8
Marshall J B, Pineda J J, Barthel K S, King P D.
Prospective randomised trial comparing sodium phosphate (PS) solution (Fleet Phospho-soda)
with PEG electrolyte lavage solution (“Colyte”) for the preparation of patients for
colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1993;
39
631-634
9
Bigard M A, Gaucher P, Lassaille C.
Fatal colonic explosion during colonoscopic polypectomy.
Gastroenterology.
1979;
77
1307-1310
F.R.C.P.E. F.R.C.P. M.D. C. U. Nwokolo
Walsgrave Hospital Clifford Bridge Road
Coventry CV2 2DX
United Kingdom
Telefon: +44-1203-538793
eMail: ChukaNwokolo@compuserve.com