Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1814408
Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty with Robotic Assistance[*]
Resultados da artroplastia total do joelho com assistência robóticaAuthors
Financial Support The authors declare that they did not receive financial support from agencies in the public, private or non-profit sectors to conduct the present study.
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) when assisted by a robotic arm compared with the conventional approach.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 96 patients who underwent TKA, assigned to either the robotic-assisted (RA) group or a conventional technique (CT) groups. All surgeries were performed without the use of a tourniquet and included administration of intravenous tranexamic acid. Patients were matched based on sex, age, and preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Ht) values. Key outcomes evaluated were perioperative blood loss (assessed through changes in Hb and Ht), operative duration, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications up to 6 months.
Results
There were 34 patients from each group successfully matched for analysis. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding Hb or Ht reduction (RA: Hb −2.27 ± 1.21 g/dL, Ht −6.56 ± 3.43%; vs. CT: Hb −2.00 ± 1.07 g/dL, Ht −5.85 ± 3.26%; p > 0.05). The mean surgical time was also similar (RA: 108.9 ± 20.8 vs. CT: 111.8 ± 26.2 min; p = 0.905). Notably, patients in the RA group experienced a shorter hospitalization period (median: 2 vs. 2.5 days; OR = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.03–0.57; p = 0.008). Incidence of postoperative complications within 6 months did not differ significantly between groups.
Conclusion
Robotic-assisted TKA was not associated with measurable improvements in blood loss, operative time, or postoperative complications. However, it contributed to a reduction in hospital stay compared with the conventional technique.
Resumo
Objetivo
Investigar os resultados da artroplastia total do joelho (ATJ) com assistência de braço robótico em comparação com a abordagem convencional.
Métodos
Realizamos um estudo de coorte retrospectivo, incluindo 96 pacientes submetidos a ATJ, que foram alocados aos grupos assistência robótica (AR) ou técnica convencional (TC). Todas as cirurgias foram realizadas sem o uso de torniquete e incluíram a administração de ácido tranexâmico intravenoso. Os pacientes foram pareados com base no sexo, na idade e nos valores pré-operatórios de hemoglobina (Hb) e hematócrito (Ht). Os principais desfechos avaliados foram a perda sanguínea perioperatória (avaliada por meio de alterações em Hb e Ht), a duração operatória, o tempo de internação hospitalar e as complicações pós-operatórias até em 6 meses.
Resultados
Foram 34 pacientes para cada grupo pareados com sucesso para análise. Não houve diferenças significativas entre os grupos quanto à redução de Hb ou Ht (AR: Hb −2,27 ± 1,21 g/dL, Ht −6,56 ± 3,43%; vs. TC: Hb −2,00 ± 1,07 g/dL, Ht −5,85 ± 3,26%; p > 0,05). O tempo cirúrgico médio também foi semelhante (AR: 108,9 ± 20,8 vs. TC: 111,8 ± 26,2 min; p = 0,905). Notavelmente, os pacientes do grupo AR tiveram um período de hospitalização mais curto (mediana: 2 vs. 2,5 dias; OR = 0,12; IC 95% = 0,03–0,57; p = 0,008). As complicações pós-operatórias em 6 meses não diferiram significativamente entre os grupos.
Conclusão
A ATJ com assistência robótica não foi associada a melhorias mensuráveis na perda sanguínea, tempo operatório ou complicações pós-operatórias. Entretanto, contribuiu para uma redução na permanência hospitalar em comparação com a técnica convencional.
Palavras-chave
artroplastia - joelho - perda sanguínea cirúrgica - procedimentos cirúrgicos robóticosData Availability
Data will be available upon request to the corresponding author.
Authors' Contributions
Each author contributed individually and significantly to the development of the article. JPFG: supervision, validation, visualization, writing - original draft, writing - review & editing, conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, validation, and visualization; JCP: research incentive, validation and visualization, data curation; writing - original draft; writing - review & editing; LS: research incentive, validation and visualization, data curation; writing - original draft; writing - review & editing; TDP: research incentive, validation and visualization, data curation; writing - original draft; writing - review & editing. PRB: conceptualization, formal analysis, validation and visualization; MVD: conceptualization; research incentive, validation, writing - review & editing, and visualization.
* Work developed at Hospital de Ortopedia Uniorte, Londrina, Brazil.
Publication History
Received: 12 September 2025
Accepted: 20 October 2025
Article published online:
30 December 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil
Joao Paulo Fernandes Guerreiro, Julia Canassa Pinto, Livia Schauff, Tiago Delfino Pedrollo, Paulo Roberto Bignardi, Marcus Vinicius Danieli. Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty with Robotic Assistance[*] . Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2025; 60: s00451814408.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1814408
-
References
- 1 OrthoInfo. Treatment: Total Knee Replacement. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; . Available from: https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/pt/treatment/artroplastia-total-de-joelho-total-knee-replacement/
- 2 Khan H, Dhillon K, Mahapatra P. et al. Blood loss and transfusion risk in robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: A retrospective analysis. Int J Med Robot 2021; 17 (06) e2308
- 3 Clark TC, Schmidt FH. Robot-assisted navigation versus computer-assisted navigation in primary total knee arthroplasty: efficiency and accuracy. ISRN Orthop 2013; 2013: 794827
- 4 Kayani B, Konan S, Ayuob A, Onochie E, Al-Jabri T, Haddad FS. Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2019; 4 (10) 611-617
- 5 Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee 2002; 9 (03) 173-180
- 6 Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Jung WB, Park HW, Lee GW. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (07) 1069-1076
- 7 Liow MHL, Goh GSH, Wong MK, Chin PL, Tay DKJ, Yeo SJ. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (09) 2942-2951
- 8 Yang HY, Seon JK, Shin YJ, Lim HA, Song EK. Robotic total knee arthroplasty with a cruciate-retaining implant: a 10-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Surg 2017; 9 (02) 169-176
- 9 Cho KJ, Seon JK, Jang WY, Park CG, Song EK. Robotic versus conventional primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological long-term results with a minimum follow-up of ten years. Int Orthop 2019; 43 (06) 1345-1354
- 10 Zhang H, Chen J, Chen F, Que W. The effect of tranexamic acid on blood loss and use of blood products in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (09) 1742-1752
- 11 Sadigursky D, Araujo LM, Fernandes RJC. Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Blood Loss in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Acta Ortop Bras 2018; 26 (01) 63-66
- 12 Alshryda S, Sukeik M, Sarda P, Blenkinsopp J, Haddad FS, Mason JM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the topical administration of tranexamic acid in total hip and knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B (08) 1005-1015
- 13 Panteli M, Papakostidis C, Dahabreh Z, Giannoudis PV. Topical tranexamic acid in total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee 2013; 20 (05) 300-309
- 14 Yang ZG, Chen WP, Wu LD. Effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (13) 1153-1159
- 15 Ahmed I, Chawla A, Underwood M. et al. Infographic: Time to reconsider the routine use of tourniquets in total knee arthroplasty surgery. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B (05) 828-829
- 16 Stimson LN, Steelman KR, Hamilton DA, Chen C, Darwiche HF, Mehaidli A. Evaluation of Blood Loss in Conventional vs MAKOplasty Total Knee Arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 2022; 16: 224-228
- 17 Fu X, She Y, Jin G. et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 2024; 18 (01) 292
- 18 Fuji T, Fujita S, Tachibana S, Kawai Y. A dose-ranging study evaluating the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8 (11) 2458-2468
- 19 Pereira RT, Pentrado JPR, Bernardinetti M, Nogueira NIA, Tavares JP, Batista GJ. Modern orthopedics: the use of robotics in total knee arthroplasty. Res Soc Dev 2022; 11 (12) e521111234960
- 20 Xu J, Li L, Fu J. et al. Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional manual total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Orthop Surg 2022; 14 (09) 1972-1980
- 21 Yi Z, Yan L, Haibo S. et al. Effects of tourniquet use on clinical outcomes and cement penetration in TKA when tranexamic acid administrated: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22 (01) 126
- 22 Hoeffel DP, Daly PJ, Kelly BJ, Giveans MR. Outcomes of the First 1,000 Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasties at a Same-day Surgery Center Using a Rapid-recovery Protocol. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2019; 3 (03) e022
- 23 Courtney PM, Boniello AJ, Berger RA. Complications Following Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of a National Database. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (05) 1426-1430
- 24 Wang JC, Piple AS, Hill WJ. et al. Computer-navigated and robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: increasing in popularity without increasing complications. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37 (12) 2358-2364
- 25 Ofa SA, Ross BJ, Flick TR, Patel AH, Sherman WF. Robotic total knee arthroplasty vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: a nationwide database study. Arthroplast Today 2020; 6 (04) 1001-1008.e3
- 26 Itou J, Kuwashima U, Itoh M, Okazaki K. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is not associated with increased risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis. J Exp Orthop 2023; Jun 29; 10 (01) 65
- 27 Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Roboticarm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B (07) 930-937
- 28 Aggarwal VA, Sun J, Sambandam SN. Outcomes following robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 144 (05) 2223-2227
