Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1814382
A Deep Neural Network-Based Computer-Assisted Prostate Segmentation in Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Images
Authors
Funding None.
Abstract
Introduction
Prostate cancer is one of the most well-known cancers in men. To decrease the mortality rate associated with prostate cancer, early identification is very essential for further treatment planning. Accurate diagnosis of the cancer stage is essential for effective treatment planning.
Objectives
We propose a computer-assisted detection and diagnosis system that uses prostate segmentation along with detection and prediction of prostate cancer grades utilizing biparametric magnetic resonance images.
Materials and Methods
The study proposed included 236 patients who underwent biparametric magnetic resonance imaging scans. These scans generated T2-weighted images and DW images of 183 patients with cancer and 53 patients without cancer. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score ranged from 1 to 5. We initially generated a prostate probabilistic map using a two-way approach, and we employed a rule-based algorithm to identify the clinically significant region within the segmented prostate. The classifiers were used to forecast grades once the clinically significant issues were confirmed.
Results
The proposed system achieved a Dice similarity coefficient of 89.4% and a Hausdorff distance of 7.78 mm. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is used as an indicator of the classifier's performance, with a value of 0.91, and the accuracy of the combined modality was 90.48%.
Conclusion
The stacked autoencoder is used to overcome challenges such as blurred prostate boundaries, variations in the size and shape of the prostate among subjects by extracting hidden features. The combined modality achieved higher classification accuracy and AUC compared with each individual modality. The random forest classifier demonstrated reasonably enhanced performance compared with K-nearest neighbor (k-NN) and support vector machine classifiers.
Authors' Contributions
The manuscript has been read and approved by all authors and each author believes that the manuscript represents honest and genuine work. All requirements for authorship have been met while drafting this manuscript.
Publication History
Article published online:
15 December 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68 (06) 394-424
- 2 Jain S, Saxena S, Kumar A. Epidemiology of prostate cancer in India. Meta Gene 2014; 2: 596-605
- 3 Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL. et al. PI-RADS prostate imaging–reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 2016; 69 (01) 16-40
- 4 Reisæter LA, Fütterer JJ, Halvorsen OJ. et al. 1.5-T multiparametric MRI using PI-RADS: a region by region analysis to localize the index-tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy. Acta Radiol 2015; 56 (04) 500-511
- 5 Rosenkrantz AB, Ayoola A, Hoffman D. et al. The learning curve in prostate MRI interpretation: self-directed learning versus continual reader feedback. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 208 (03) W92-W100
- 6 Gatti M, Faletti R, Calleris G. et al. Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI). Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44 (05) 1883-1893
- 7 Erickson BJ, Korfiatis P, Akkus Z, Kline TL. Machine learning for medical imaging. Radiographics 2017; 37 (02) 505-515
- 8 Alkadi R, Taher F, El-Baz A, Werghi N. A deep learning-based approach for the detection and localization of prostate cancer in T2 magnetic resonance images. J Digit Imaging 2019; 32 (05) 793-807
- 9 Zaharchuk G, Gong E, Wintermark M, Rubin D, Langlotz CP. Deep learning in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018; 39 (10) 1776-1784
- 10 Ginsburg SB, Algohary A, Pahwa S. et al. Radiomic features for prostate cancer detection on MRI differ between the transition and peripheral zones: preliminary findings from a multi-institutional study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 46 (01) 184-193
- 11 Wu M, Krishna S, Thornhill RE, Flood TA, McInnes MDF, Schieda N. Transition zone prostate cancer: logistic regression and machine-learning models of quantitative ADC, shape and texture features are highly accurate for diagnosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 50 (03) 940-950
- 12 Cheng R, Roth HR, Lu L. et al. Active appearance model and deep learning for more accurate prostate segmentation on MRI. Med Imaging: Image processing 2016; 9784: 678-686 . SPIE
- 13 Shin HC, Orton MR, Collins DJ, Doran SJ, Leach MO. Stacked autoencoders for unsupervised feature learning and multiple organ detection in a pilot study using 4D patient data. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2013; 35 (08) 1930-1943
- 14 Fassia MK, Balasubramanian A, Woo S. et al. Deep learning prostate MRI segmentation accuracy and robustness: a systematic review. Radiol Artif Intell 2024; 6 (04) e230138
- 15 Wang S, Burtt K, Turkbey B, Choyke P, Summers RM. Computer aided-diagnosis of prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI: a technical review of current research. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014 (01) 789561
- 16 Kalinic H. Atlas-Based Image Segmentation: A Survey. Croatian Sci Bibliography; 2009: 1-7
- 17 Vos PC, Barentsz JO, Karssemeijer N, Huisman HJ. Automatic computer-aided detection of prostate cancer based on multiparametric magnetic resonance image analysis. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57 (06) 1527-1542
- 18 Guo Y, Gao Y, Shen D. Deformable MR prostate segmentation via deep feature learning and sparse patch matching. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016; 35 (04) 1077-1089
- 19 Cheng R, Roth HR, Lu L. et al. Active appearance model and deep learning for more accurate prostate segmentation on MRI. Paper presented at: Medical Imaging. Vol. 9784 of Proceedings of the SPIE:678–686; 2016
- 20 Domingues I, Pereira G, Martins P. et al. Using deep learning techniques in medical imaging: a systematic review of applications on CT and PET. Artif Intell Rev 2020; 53 (06) 4093-4160
- 21 Bertelli E, Vizzi M, Marzi C. et al. Biparametric vs. Multiparametric MRI in the detection of cancer in transperineal targeted-biopsy-proven peripheral prostate cancer lesions classified as PI-RADS Score 3 or 3+1: the added value of ADC quantification. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14 (15) 1608
- 22 Schelb P, Kohl S, Radtke JP. et al. Classification of cancer at prostate MRI: deep learning versus clinical PI-RADS assessment. Radiology 2019; 293 (03) 607-617
- 23 Siegel C. Re: classification of cancer at prostate MRI: deep learning versus clinical PI-RADS assessment. J Urol 2020; 204 (03) 597
- 24 Tian Z, Liu L, Zhang Z, Fei B. Superpixel-based segmentation for 3D prostate MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016; 35 (03) 791-801
- 25 Vincent G, Guillard G, Bowes M. Fully automatic segmentation of the prostate using active appearance models. In: MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012; 2012
- 26 Mahapatra D, Buhmann JM. Prostate MRI segmentation using learned semantic knowledge and graph cuts. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2014; 61 (03) 756-764
- 27 Toth R, Madabhushi A. Multifeature landmark-free active appearance models: application to prostate MRI segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2012; 31 (08) 1638-1650
- 28 Milletari F, Navab N, Ahmadi SA. V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. Paper presented at: 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV); 2016: 565-571
- 29 Zhu Q, Du B, Turkbey B. et al. Deeply-supervised CNN for prostate segmentation. Paper presented at: 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN); 2017: 178-184
- 30 Liao S, Gao Y, Oto A. et al. Representation learning: a unified deep learning framework for automatic prostate MR segmentation. Paper presented at: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2013: 16th International Conference, Nagoya, Japan, September 22–26, 2013, Proceedings, Part II 16; 2013: 254-261
- 31 Li A, Li C, Wang X. et al. Automated segmentation of prostate MR images using prior knowledge enhanced random walker. Paper presented at: 2013 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA): IEEE; 2013: 1-7
- 32 Yu L, Yang X, Chen H. et al. Volumetric ConvNets with mixed residual connections for automated prostate segmentation from 3D MR images. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. Vol. 31; No. 1; 2017
- 33 Meglič J, Sunoqrot MRS, Bathen TF, Elschot M. Label-set impact on deep learning-based prostate segmentation on MRI. Insights Imaging 2023; 14 (01) 157
