Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1814085
A Pictorial Review of the 2020 Padua Criteria in Diagnosing Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy with Insights from Native T1 Mapping
Authors
Funding None.
Abstract
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a heritable myocardial disorder characterized by progressive fibrofatty replacement, typically involving the right and/or left ventricles. The 2020 Padua Criteria offer an updated, multiparametric diagnostic framework that addresses the limitations of the 2010 Task Force Criteria. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), particularly native T1 mapping, has emerged as a pivotal modality for myocardial tissue characterization in ACM. This prospective study evaluated four patients with clinically suspected ACM and 12 age-matched healthy controls. All participants underwent comprehensive CMR at 3.0 Tesla, including cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and native/postcontrast T1 mapping. The Padua Criteria were applied for diagnostic classification and phenotypic characterization. Quantitative T1 mapping was employed to assess myocardial fibrosis. Application of the Padua Criteria yielded diagnoses of right-dominant ACM (n = 1), biventricular ACM (n = 2), and a borderline case (n = 1). Native T1 values were significantly elevated in the right ventricular free wall among ACM patients compared with controls (mean 1462.25 vs. 1245.51 ms, p < 0.0001). Notably, native T1 mapping identified diffuse myocardial abnormalities in cases lacking LGE. The Padua Criteria facilitates accurate phenotypic classification of ACM. Native T1 mapping enhances diagnostic sensitivity, particularly in early or subtle disease, and represents a promising noninvasive biomarker of myocardial fibrosis. Further validation in larger cohorts is warranted.
Keywords
arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy - cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) - late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) - native T1 mapping - Padua Criteria - right ventricular dysfunctionNote
The manuscript was earlier presented by Dr. Thiagarajan Veerappan as part of poster presentation in AOCR 2025 at Chennai on January 24, 2025. Abstract ID – ABS0288.
Publication History
Article published online:
09 December 2025
© 2025. Indographics. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Murphy DT, Shine SC, Cradock A, Galvin JM, Keelan ET, Murray JG. Cardiac MRI in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (04) W299-306
- 2 Galizia MS, Attili AK, Truesdell WR. et al. Imaging features of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies. Radiographics 2024; 44 (04) e230154
- 3 Motevali M, Siahi Z, Mohammadzadeh A, Sangi A. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) compared with echocardiography. Med Sci (Basel) 2018; 6 (03) 80
- 4 Rastegar N, Burt JR, Corona-Villalobos CP. et al. Cardiac MR findings and potential diagnostic pitfalls in patients evaluated for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Radiographics 2014; 34 (06) 1553-1570
- 5 Malik N, Mukherjee M, Wu KC. et al. Multimodality imaging in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2022; 15 (02) e013725
- 6 Graziano F, Zorzi A, Cipriani A. et al. The 2020 “Padua Criteria” for diagnosis and phenotype characterization of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy in clinical practice. J Clin Med 2022; 11 (01) 279
- 7 Georgiopoulos G, Zampieri M, Molaro S. et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with ARVC and family members: the potential role of native T1 mapping. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 37 (06) 2037-2047
- 8 Tribuna L, Oliveira PB, Iruela A, Marques J, Santos P, Teixeira T. Reference values of native T1 at 3T cardiac magnetic resonance-standardization considerations between different vendors. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11 (12) 2334
- 9 Corrado D, Perazzolo Marra M, Zorzi A. et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: the Padua criteria. Int J Cardiol 2020; 319: 106-114
- 10 Gowda S, Kothari RJ, Raj V. Myocardial tissue characterization by cardiac magnetic resonance: a primer for the clinician. J Indian Acad Echocardiogr Cardiovasc Imaging 2023; 7 (01) 16-30
- 11 Mondy VC, Peter SB, Ravi R. Native T1 mapping in diffuse myocardial diseases using 3-Tesla MRI: an institutional experience. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2020; 30 (04) 465-472
- 12 Haaf P, Garg P, Messroghli DR, Broadbent DA, Greenwood JP, Plein S. Cardiac T1 mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) in clinical practice: a comprehensive review. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2016; 18 (01) 89
- 13 Moon JC, Messroghli DR, Kellman P. et al; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Working Group of the European Society of Cardiology. Myocardial T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification: a Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) and CMR Working Group of the European Society of Cardiology consensus statement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15 (01) 92
- 14 Sen-Chowdhry S, Syrris P, McKenna WJ. Role of genetic analysis in the management of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50 (19) 1813-1821
- 15 Bourfiss M, Prakken NHJ, van der Heijden JF. et al. Diagnostic value of native T1 mapping in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 12 (8 Pt 1): 1580-1582
