Libyan Universities: Navigating the Global Ranking Maze

Abstract

Most Libyan universities are ranked very low—or are entirely absent—from international university rankings. This review article explores the multifaceted causes of this disappointing status along two main lines: systemic biases inherent in most international ranking frameworks and major internal challenges within the Libyan higher education system. We demonstrate how international ranking criteria tend to favor well-established Western institutions while disadvantaging counterparts in developing nations. At the same time, the article highlights specific internal issues within Libyan higher education that hinder performance and limit international competitiveness. There is, in fact, a continuous and synergistic interaction between these external biases and internal deficiencies, which together exacerbate the poor global standing of Libyan universities. Ultimately, the article concludes with a mission-level set of specific recommendations aimed at helping policymakers and university administrators implement strategic improvements to strengthen the core competencies of Libyan universities and, consequently, enhance their global rankings.

Keywords

Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) - Arab universities - International university rankings - Libya - Libyan universities - QS World University Rankings - Times Higher Education (THE) - Webometrics Ranking of World Universities

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 30. Juli 2025

Angenommen: 05. Oktober 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
17. Dezember 2025

• References

• 1 Aguillo IF, Bar-Ilan J, Levene M, Ortega JL. Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics 2010; 85 (01) 243-256
• 2 Rauhvargers A. Global University Rankings and Their Impact. Brussels: European University Association; 2011
• 3 de Wit H, Altbach PG. Internationalization in higher education: global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education 2020; 5 (01) 28-46
• 4 THE Rankings 2025 [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jul 20]. Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/latest/world-ranking
• 5 ARWU. 2024 [Internet]. Accessed July 20, 2025 at: https://www.hotcoursesabroad.com/study/rankings/arwu.html
• 6 QS Rankings 2026 [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jul 20]. Available from: https://www.topuniversities.com/world-university-rankings?page=49
• 7 Aguillo IF. Ranking Web of Universities (webometrics.info). January 2025 edition. Madrid, Spain: Cybermetrics Lab (IPP-CSIC); . Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/comment/leader/leader-only-the-best-for-the-best/408968.article
• 8 Mroz A. Leader: Only the best for the best. Times Higher Education. 2010 Aug 7.
• 9 Hazelkorn E. Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World-Class Excellence. 2nd ed.. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015
• 10 Marginson S. Global university rankings: implications in general and for Australia. J High Educ Policy Manag 2007; 29 (02) 131-142
• 11 Jöns H, Hoyler M. Global geographies of higher education: the perspective of world university rankings. Geoforum 2013; 46: 45-59
• 12 Altbach PG. The globalization of college and university rankings. Change The Magazine of Higher Learning 2012; 44 (01) 26-31
• 13 Salmi J. The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2009
• 14 The Impact of Rankings on Government Policies & Higher Education Strategies [Internet]. UNIRANKS; Accessed July 20, 2025 at: https://www.uniranks.com/explore/trends-policies/the-impact-of-rankings-on-government-policies-higher-education-strategies
• 15 Thelwall M, Kousha K. Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the web. El Profesional de la Información 2015; 24 (05) 587-606
• 16 Thuranira S, Diki PM. Webometrics ranking of universities: fallacy or reality. Afr J Sci Technol Soc Sci 2023; 2 (02) 24-31
• 17 Marginson S. Research on international and global higher education: six different perspectives. Oxf Rev Educ 2022; 48 (04) 421-438
• 18 Quacquarelli Symonds QS. What Do Employers Want From Today's Graduates?. Insights From the 2022 QS Global Employer Survey [Internet]. London, UK: QS Quacquarelli Symonds; 2022 Aug [cited 2025 Jun 24]. Available at: https://www.studocu.com/en-au/document/university-of-technology-sydney/professional-practice/what-do-employers-want-from-todays-graduates-2022/67547732
• 19 Badran A, Baydoun E, Hillman JR. eds. Major Challenges Facing Higher Education in the Arab World: Quality Assurance and Relevance. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2019
• 20 International Organization for Migration (IOM). International Students [Internet]. Migration Data Portal. Accessed June 24, 2025 at: https://www.migrationdataportal.org/themes/international-students-trends
• 21 Renewed Violence Shuts Down Libya's U. of Tripoli. Al-Fanar Media. 2025 May. Accessed July 20, 2025 at: https://www.al-fanarmedia.org/2025/05/renewed-violence-shuts-down-libyas-u-of-tripoli/
• 22 UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) - Libya [Internet]. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2024. Feb. Accessed April 23, 2023 at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS?locations=LY
• 23 Central Bank of Libya (CBL). Detailed Government Budget Allocations and Expenditure (January–August 2024) [Internet]. Tripoli: Central Bank of Libya; . Accessed September 13, 2024 at: https://cbl.gov.ly/en/micifaf/sites/4/2024/09/13.pdf
• 24 Elkhouly AR, Masoud OJ, Shafsha HA. Higher education in Libya, challenges and problems: a descriptive study. Am Res J Humanit Soc Sci 2021; 4 (12) 52-61
• 25 Tashani O. The scientific research in libya: the role of the new generation of researchers. Libyan J Med 2009; 4 (04) 129-130
• 26 Suwaed H. An investigation into the factors that impede scientific research in higher education in Libya: TIME TO ACT. Br J Earth Sci Res 2017; 5 (12) 91-100
• 27 Bezuidenhout L, Karrar O, Lezaun J, Nobes A. Economic sanctions and academia: overlooked impact and long-term consequences. PLoS One 2019; 14 (10) e0222669
• 28 Beerkens M. Quality assurance in the political context: in the midst of different expectations and conflicting goals. Qual High Educ 2015; 21 (03) 231-250
• 29 Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. Board Independence and Institutional Autonomy. Accessed September 29, 2025 at: https://agb.org/knowledge-center/board-fundamentals/board-independence-and-institutional-autonomy/