RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1812484
Transarterial Embolotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy Versus Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis
Autoren
Abstract
Purpose
Breast cancer liver metastases (BCLMs) are common and associated with poor prognosis despite systemic treatments. This study compared overall survival (OS) and treatment outcomes of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for BCLM, including the impact of their combination with immunotherapy or chemotherapy.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study used a large multicenter database, TriNetX, which aggregates anonymized electronic medical records from 68 health care organizations in the United States, and included patients with BCLM who underwent TARE (n = 334) or TACE (n = 84) between January 2016 and July 2024, after progressing despite one, two, or three lines of systemic therapy. TARE or TACE was performed alone or in combination with chemotherapy or immunotherapy. The primary outcome was OS, and secondary outcomes included liver function changes and adverse events. Kaplan–Meier and propensity score-matched analyses were performed.
Results
Median OS was significantly longer after TARE (36 months) than TACE (25 months; p = 0.04). Immunotherapy/TARE showed the longest OS (38 months), followed by immunotherapy/TACE (36 months; p = 0.03), chemotherapy/TARE (33 months; p = 0.05), and chemotherapy/TACE (30 months; p = 0.04). TACE was associated with higher postprocedural liver enzyme elevations and greater rates of adverse events compared with TARE.
Conclusion
In this large retrospective study, TARE was associated with superior survival and better tolerability compared with TACE in BCLM patients. Combination with immunotherapy further improved outcomes, suggesting potential synergy. These findings highlight the need for prospective studies to evaluate the role of TARE and immunotherapy in BCLM treatment.
Declaration of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies in the Writing Process
During the preparation of this work, the authors did not use generative AI or AI-assisted technologies. All content was generated and reviewed solely by the authors, who take full responsibility for the final work.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This research adheres to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and institutional guidelines. All data were de-identified and fully compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by our institution's institutional review board, with a waiver of informed consent due to the retrospective nature of the study and use of de-identified data.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was waived by the institutional review board due to the use of anonymized, de-identified data collected for research purposes.
This work was carried out at Charleston Area Medical Center.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. November 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Liberchuk AN, Deipolyi AR. Hepatic metastasis from breast cancer. Semin Intervent Radiol 2020; 37 (05) 518-526
- 2 Mouli SK, Gupta R, Sheth N, Gordon AC, Lewandowski RJ. Locoregional therapies for the treatment of hepatic metastases from breast and gynecologic cancers. Semin Intervent Radiol 2018; 35 (01) 29-34
- 3 Daye D, Panagides J, Norton L. et al. New frontiers in the role of locoregional therapies in breast cancer: proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation Research Consensus Panel. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2023; 34 (10) 1835-1842
- 4 Deipolyi AR, Ward RC, Riaz A. et al. Locoregional therapies for primary and metastatic breast cancer: AJR Expert Panel narrative review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222 (02) e2329454
- 5 Chang J, Charalel R, Noda C. et al. Liver-dominant breast cancer metastasis: a comparative outcomes study of chemoembolization versus radioembolization. Anticancer Res 2018; 38 (05) 3063-3068
- 6 Aarts BM, Muñoz FMG, Wildiers H. et al. Intra-arterial therapies for liver metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2021; 44 (12) 1868-1882
- 7 Zhou W, Du L, Brown DB, Shah RP, Sze DY. Outcomes analysis of yttrium-90 radioembolization for tumors other than metastatic colorectal cancer from the Radiation-Emitting SIR-Spheres in Nonresectable (RESiN) Registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35 (11) 1591-1600.e3
- 8 Deipolyi AR, Bromberg JF, Erinjeri JP, Solomon SB, Brody LA, Riedl CC. Abscopal effect after radioembolization for metastatic breast cancer in the setting of immunotherapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29 (03) 432-433
- 9 Deipolyi AR, Johnson CB, Erinjeri JP, Bryce YC. Combination therapies with Y90: immunoradiation. Dig Dis Interv 2020; 4 (04) 382-388
- 10 Karimi A, Yarmohammadi H, Erinjeri JP. Immune effects of intra-arterial liver-directed therapies. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35 (02) 178-184

