Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1812015
A Novel Cut-out Syringe Scalp Retractor for Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy for Craniosynostosis—A Cost-effective and Durable Alternative
Authors
Abstract
Aim
Unilateral coronal craniosynostosis is the second most common subtype of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Endoscopic repair requires a scalp and dural retractor for adequate visualization and performing strip craniectomy. We describe the application of a novel cut-out syringe scalp retractor for endoscopic repair of unilateral coronal craniosynostosis.
Background
A 3-month-old female child presented with a progressive abnormal head shape. Three-dimensional reconstruction of brain CT showed a right fused coronal suture with ipsilateral temporal and contralateral frontal prominence. A diagnosis of unilateral coronal synostosis was made. The patient underwent endoscopic strip craniectomy using a novel cut-out syringe scalp retractor. The craniectomy extended from the right squamosal suture to the anterior fontanelle. The postoperative recovery was uneventful.
Discussion and Conclusion
The main aim of endoscopic surgery is to swiftly address the progression of calvarial and facial dysmorphism. The timings of endoscopic repair are crucial and usually performed before 3 months of age. It has a distinct advantage over open repair owing to shorter hospital stays, less bleeding, lower operative times, comparable aesthetic outcomes, and being minimally invasive. For endoscopic repair, various retractors have been described in the literature but these retractors are difficult to procure in resource-constrained setup. We advocate the usage of a cost-effective, durable, reusable, and malleable scalp retractor whose cost is nominal. It can be safely sterilized or can be newly made for every case. We found this retractor to be extremely useful in the case of endoscopic strip craniectomy.
Keywords
coronal craniosynostosis - endoscopic repair - syringe retractor - novel technique - strip craniectomyAuthors' Contributions
A.S. and A.M. contributed to the conception and design of the work. A.M., H.P., and R.C. were responsible for data collection, while R.M., H.P., and R.C. carried out data editing and analysis. H.P., A.M., and R.C. drafted the article, and A.S. and R.M. performed the critical revision. The final version was reviewed by A.S.
Patient's Consent
Full and detailed consent from the patient/guardian has been taken. The patient's identity has been adequately anonymized. If anything related to the patient's identity is shown, adequate consent has been taken from the patient/relative/guardian. The journal will not be responsible for any medico-legal issues arising out of issues related to the patient's identity or any other issues arising from the public display of the images/video.
Publication History
Article published online:
25 September 2025
© 2025. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Poot M. Structural genome variations related to craniosynostosis. Mol Syndromol 2019; 10 (1-2): 24-39
- 2 Timberlake AT, Persing JA. Genetics of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (06) 1508-1516
- 3 Cohen MM, MacLean RE. eds Craniosynostosis: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management. 2nd ed.. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000
- 4 Boyadjiev SA. International Craniosynostosis Consortium. Genetic analysis of non-syndromic craniosynostosis. Orthod Craniofac Res 2007; 10 (03) 129-137
- 5 Kalantar-Hormozi H, Abbaszadeh-Kasbi A, Sharifi G, Davai NR, Kalantar-Hormozi A. Incidence of familial craniosynostosis among patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (06) e514-e517
- 6 Jimenez DF, Barone CM. Minimally invasive craniosynostosis Surgery. In: Pediatric Neurosurgery: Tricks of the Trade. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2016: 151-157
- 7 Hersh DS, Lambert WA, Bookland MJ, Martin JE. Minimally invasive strip craniectomy for metopic craniosynostosis using a lighted retractor. Neurosurg Focus Video 2021; 4 (02) V5
- 8 Lenton KA, Nacamuli RP, Wan DC, Helms JA, Longaker MT. Cranial suture biology. In: Current Topics in Developmental Biology. Elsevier; 2005: 287-328
- 9 Senarath-Yapa K, Chung MT, McArdle A. et al. Craniosynostosis: molecular pathways and future pharmacologic therapy. Organogenesis 2012; 8 (04) 103-113
- 10 Delashaw JB, Persing JA, Broaddus WC, Jane JA. Cranial vault growth in craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 1989; 70 (02) 159-165
- 11 Fearon JA, Singh DJ, Beals SP, Yu JC. The diagnosis and treatment of single-sutural synostoses: are computed tomographic scans necessary?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (05) 1327-1331
- 12 Taylor JA, Derderian CA, Bartlett SP, Fiadjoe JE, Sussman EM, Stricker PA. Perioperative morbidity in posterior cranial vault expansion: distraction osteogenesis versus conventional osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (04) 674e-680e
- 13 Lannelongue M. De la craniectomie dans la microcephalie. C R Acad Sci 1890; 110: 1382-1385
- 14 Jimenez DF, Barone CM. Endoscopic craniectomy for early surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 1998; 88 (01) 77-81
- 15 Vicari F. . Endoscopic Correction of Sagittal Synostosis. Am Soc Plast Reconstr Surg Presymposium San Diego CA; 1994
- 16 Jimenez DF, Barone CM. Endoscopic treatment of craniosynostosis. In: Youmans & Winn Neurological Surgery Elsevier; 2023. 1691. e1-e13
- 17 Yan H, Abel TJ, Alotaibi NM. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic versus open treatment of craniosynostosis. Part 1: the sagittal suture. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2018; 22 (04) 352-360
- 18 Yan H, Abel TJ, Alotaibi NM. et al. A systematic review of endoscopic versus open treatment of craniosynostosis. Part 2: the nonsagittal single sutures. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2018; 22 (04) 361-368
- 19 Masserano B, Woo AS, Skolnick GB. et al. The temporal region in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis: fronto-orbital advancement versus endoscopy-assisted strip craniectomy. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018; 55 (03) 423-429
- 20 Isaac KV, MacKinnon S, Dagi LR, Rogers GF, Meara JG, Proctor MR. Nonsyndromic unilateral coronal synostosis: a comparison of fronto-orbital advancement and endoscopic suturectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (03) 838-848
- 21 Varagur K, Skolnick GB, Naidoo SD, Smyth MD, Patel KB. School-age outcomes in patients with unilateral coronal synostosis: comparison of fronto-orbital advancement and endoscopic strip craniectomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2022; 29 (05) 560-567
- 22 Williams CT, Segar DJ, Naidoo SD. et al. Evaluation of endoscopic strip craniectomy and orthotic therapy for bilateral coronal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (02) 453-457
- 23 Garber ST, Karsy M, Kestle JRW, Siddiqi F, Spanos SP, Riva-Cambrin J. Comparing outcomes and cost of 3 surgical treatments for sagittal synostosis: a retrospective study including procedure-related cost analysis. Neurosurgery 2017; 81 (04) 680-687
- 24 Liles C, Dallas J, Hale AT. et al. The economic impact of open versus endoscope-assisted craniosynostosis surgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2019; 24 (02) 145-152
- 25 Stanbouly D, Ascherman JA, Chuang S-K. Open repair versus closed repair: a cost-analysis of the two surgical approaches for the treatment of craniosynostoses. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022; 80 (03) 465-470
- 26 Proctor MR. Endoscopic cranial suture release for the treatment of craniosynostosis—is it the future?. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (01) 225-228
- 27 Hashim PW, Patel A, Yang JF. et al. The effects of whole-vault cranioplasty versus strip craniectomy on long-term neuropsychological outcomes in sagittal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (03) 491-501
