Evaluation of the Manual Dexterity of Second-Year Dental Students after One Semester of Preclinical Training

Abstract

Objectives

Utilizing the Purdue Pegboard exam and the O'Connor exam, we assessed the impact of a semester-long preclinical training on the manual dexterity of dental students. Moreover, we examined the impact of gender, additional dental education, and practical exercises on manual dexterity.

Materials and Methods

The study comprised a cohort of 45 preclinical students who were in their first year of dental school. The sample process was simple and convenient. Assessments were conducted at two distinct time points: T0, before the preclinical training laboratory, and T1, 7 months after the preclinical training laboratory. The Purdue Pegboard Test and the O'Connor Tweezer Dexterity Test were administered under identical conditions in both rounds of the trial. A validated survey was utilized to collect data on the gender, hands on activities, extra dental training, artistic skills, psychomotor skills, outdoor activities, and previous exposure to dental skills of each participant.

Results

The dental students in the study demonstrated a significant improvement in their manual dexterity skills from the dental simulation preclinical laboratory training (T0) to 7 months of laboratory training (T1). This improvement was measured using the Purdue Pegboard Test and the O'Connor Tweezer Dexterity Test, with statistical significance at p < 0.05. Females have a significantly higher score in the Purdue indirect visual test of the left hand than males. Students who dedicated extra time to dental training showed significant improvements compared with those who did not allocate extra time for training.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the importance of manual dexterity in dental education and its correlation with preclinical training, hands-on practice, and gender. The results indicate significant improvements in manual dexterity following one semester of preclinical training, with discernible differences between genders. The findings highlight the significance of practice and further training in improving manual dexterity skills in dental students. This suggests that there may be implications for the development of curriculum and admissions procedures in dental education.

Keywords

manual dexterity - Pegboard Test - O'Connor test - dental training

• References

• 1 Yıldırım YA, Süsgün Yıldırım Z, Ergun N. Evaluation of manual dexterity when using a mirror of dental students and academicians with increasing professional experience. Eur J Dent Educ 2024; 28 (02) 430-437
• 2 Lugassy D, Levanon Y, Pilo R. et al. Predicting the clinical performance of dental students with a manual dexterity test. PLoS One 2018; 13 (03) e0193980
• 3 Novack R, Turgeon DP. Investigating Dental Aptitude Test (DAT) results as predictors for preclinical and clinical scores in dental school. J Dent Educ 2020; 84 (11) 1254-1261
• 4 Takahashi K, Tsuruta J, Tonami K, Araki K. Relation between manual dexterity and the accuracy of cavity preparation. Ann Oral Health Dent Res 2018; 1 (01) A13-A17
• 5 Saeed M, Alfarra MBQ, Abdelmagied MH. et al. Comparative analysis of manual dexterity of dental students at Ajman University following one academic year of preclinical training sessions: a longitudinal cohort study. Eur J Dent 2023; 17 (04) 1179-1188
• 6 Johnson GM, Stein AB, Fitzgerald NM, Copeland CC, Velazquez DM, Trowbridge T. Predictors of preclinical hand skill performance in dental school. J Dent Educ 2020; 84 (10) 1117-1125
• 7 Imam SZ. Manual dexterity: an important tool for dentists. EC Dent Sci. 2019; 18: 1409-1419
• 8 Causby R, Reed L, McDonnell M, Hillier S. Use of objective psychomotor tests in health professionals. Percept Mot Skills 2014; 118 (03) 765-804
• 9 Liu P, Chrysidou A, Doehler J, Hebart MN, Wolbers T, Kuehn E. The organizational principles of de-differentiated topographic maps in somatosensory cortex. eLife 2021; 10: e60090
• 10 Neves TDC, Carrer Hallak J, Margato Pazos J, Garcia PPNS. Preclinical dental training: association between fine motor skills and compliance with ergonomic posture techniques. Eur J Dent Educ 2023; 27 (01) 195-200
• 11 Constansia RDN, Hentzen JEKR, Buis CI, Klaase JM, de Meijer VE, Meerdink M. Is surgical subspecialization associated with hand grip strength and manual dexterity? A cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg 2022 Jan 1; 73.
• 12 Psotta R, Hendl J, Kokštejn J, Jahodová G, Elfmark M. Development of the motor functions in 7–15-year-old children: the Czech National Study. Auc Kinanthropologica 2015; 50 (02) 87-97
• 13 Judge J, Stirling J. Fine motor skill performance in left- and right-handers: Evidence of an advantage for left-handers. Laterality 2003; 8 (04) 297-306
• 14 Kopiez R, Jabusch HC, Galley N, Homann JC, Lehmann AC, Altenmueller E. No disadvantage for left-handed musicians: the relationship between handedness, perceived constraints and performance-related skills in string players and pianists. Psychol Music 2012; 40 (03) 357-384
• 15 Nasir WM, Jaafar A, Wahab RA, Harun K, Ali AH. Experiences of left-handed undergraduates in a dental faculty in Malaysia. Arch Orofac Sci 2019; 14 (02) 147-156