RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810616
On Time and Target: Evaluating Colonoscopy Performance and Learning Curves in Coloproctology Residents
Authors
Funding The author(s) received no financial support for the research.

Abstract
Colonoscopy is an essential procedure in colorectal cancer screening and treatment, and high-quality exams are crucial for maximizing diagnostic efficacy. Technical proficiency in colonoscopy is a key factor for the quality of the procedures and, so, for patient safety. This study analyzes the colonoscopy learning curve of coloproctology residents, using cecal intubation time as a metric. Cecal intubation time was analyzed in 216 exams performed by first- and second-year coloproctology residents at a university hospital in Rio de Janeiro/RJ, over a period of 10 months. The results revealed a learning curve with a significant reduction in cecal intubation time over the course of the training, particularly in first-year residents, who began their training in an environment with more frequent exams. These results align with earlier studies, emphasizing the importance of repetitive practice for developing the technical skills needed for competent colonoscopy.
The findings of this study demonstrate that conducting between 100 and 150 colonoscopies suggests a suitable benchmark for achieving competence in this procedure.
Authors' Contribution
JCB: designed the study, collected and analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript; PCCJ: supervised the project, interpreted the data, and revised the manuscript; RGM: critically reviewed the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 17. Mai 2025
Angenommen: 16. Juli 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
07. Oktober 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil
Juliana Chaves Brandão, Paulo Cesar de Castro Junior, Ruy Garcia Marques. On Time and Target: Evaluating Colonoscopy Performance and Learning Curves in Coloproctology Residents. Journal of Coloproctology 2025; 45: s00451810616.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810616
-
References
- 1 Sorbello MP, Corrêa PAFP. Colonoscopia diagnóstica e terapêutica. In: Campos FGC, Regadas FSP, Pinho M. eds. Tratado de coloproctologia. 2ª ed.. Rio de Janeiro: Thieme Revinter Publicações; 2024: 55-74 . ISBN: 9786555722734
- 2 Qayed E, Vora R, Levy S, Bostick RM. Colonoscopy procedural volume increases adenoma and polyp detection rates in gastroenterologytrainees. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9 (11) 540-551
- 3 Dong Z, Sun H, Li B. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the learning curve to achieve satisfactory adenoma detection rate. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38 (11) 3301-3309
- 4 Zuber-Jerger I, Endlicher E, Gelbmann CM. Factors affecting cecal and ileal intubation time in colonoscopy. Med Klin (Munich) 2008; 103 (07) 477-481
- 5 Ward ST, Mohammed MA, Walt R, Valori R, Ismail T, Dunckley P. An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut 2014; 63 (11) 1746-1754
- 6 Oh JR, Han KS, Hong CW. et al. Colonoscopy learning curves for colorectal surgery fellow trainees: experiences with the 15-year colonoscopy training program. Ann Surg Treat Res 2018; 95 (04) 169-174
- 7 Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M. et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterol J 2017; 5 (03) 309-334
- 8 Yoon JY, Cha JM. Can We Measure the Learning Curve of Colonoscopy Using Polyp Detection Rate?. Clin Endosc 2016; 49 (01) 6-7
- 9 Bernstein C, Thorn M, Monsees K, Spell R, O'Connor JB. A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61 (01) 72-75
- 10 Moon SY, Kim BC, Sohn DK. et al. Predictors for difficult cecal insertion in colonoscopy: The impact of obesity indices. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23 (13) 2346-2354
- 11 Shahidi N, Ou G, Telford J, Enns R. Establishing the learning curve for achieving competency in performing colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80 (03) 410-416
- 12 von Renteln D, Robertson DJ, Bensen S, Pohl H. Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85 (03) 574-580
- 13 Kim HY. Cecal intubation time in screening colonoscopy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100 (19) e25927