Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810117
Laryngeal Dimensions: A Computed Tomography Study
Authors
Funding The authors declare that they did not receive funding from agencies in the public, private or non-profit sectors to conduct the present study.

Abstract
Introduction
The computed tomography (CT) details of the dimensions of the larynx are not fully covered in the literature, so it is important to build up a database for the CT measurements of that area in different ethnic groups. Preoperative details provided by CT are crucial prior to any procedure or approach involving the larynx.
Objective
To measure and report the different dimensions of the larynx and vocal cords through CT.
Methods
We analyzed 100 CTs of the larynx (200 vocal cords): axial images were acquired through multiplanar reformation to obtain minute details of all subjects.
Results
The mean anteroposterior (AP) vocal fold length (VFL) was of 16.8 ± 2.6 (range: 11.8–22.9) mm, which was significantly longer in male subjects (mean = 18.4 ± 2.2 mm; range = 10.9–19.8 mm) compared to female subjects (mean = 15.3 ± 1.95 mm; range = 10.9–22.9 mm). The mean width of the subglottic area was of 14.88 ± 2.18 (range = 8.9–21.1) mm, which was significantly wider in male subjects (15.6 ± 2.13 mm; range = 9.1–21.1 mm) compared to female subjects (mean = 14.18 ± 1.99 mm; range = 8.9–17.8 mm). There was a positive correlation between the AP and transverse diameters of the subglotic area with the VFL: the longer the AP and transverse diameters of the subglottic area, the longer the VFL and vice versa.
Conclusion
The present study improves the awareness of surgeons and radiologists of the laryngeal dimensions, and it can be of help to residents in training.
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
Informed written consent was signed by all subjects after an explanation of the purposes of the study. The subjects, who were all older than 16 years of age, also consented to the publication of the study data. The Review Board of Zagazig University Hospitals approved the study.
Availability of Data and Materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Authors' Contributions
MWE: suggested and developed research idea; conception, reviewed literature; interpretation, and analysis of collected data; tabulated data, wrote manuscript; assisted in preparing tables and approved submitted version. AA: take patient consent, take IRB approval, kept record of patients' information, data interpretation, and analysis of collected data; assisted in writing methods and revising written manuscript; approved submitted version. AH: reviewed literature; assisted in interpretation and analysis of collected data; assisted in preparing tables and approved submitted version. MIAH: reviewed written manuscript, assist in preparing table, Data analysis, revised manuscript critically for important intellectual content, and approved submitted version. EH: revise written manuscript, revise work, revised manuscript critically for important intellectual content, and approved submitted version. MAE: revise written manuscript, revise work, revised manuscript critically for important intellectual content, and approved submitted version. MAM: modify research idea, collect data, tabulate data, assist in statistical analysis, assist in writing manuscript, data analysis, revised manuscript critically for important intellectual content, and approved submitted version.
Publication History
Received: 12 October 2024
Accepted: 04 June 2025
Article published online:
09 October 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil
Mohammad Waheed El-Anwar, Ali Awad, Atef Hussain, Ehsan Hendawy, Mohammad A. El Shawadfy, Mohamed Ibrahim Abdelzeem Heggy, Mohamed Adel Mobasher. Laryngeal Dimensions: A Computed Tomography Study. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2025; 29: s00451810117.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810117
-
References
- 1 Hibi SR, Bless DM, Hirano M, Yoshida T. Distortions of videofiberscopy imaging: reconsideration and correction. J Voice 1988; 2 (02) 168-175 10.1016/S0892-1997(88)80073-0
- 2 Peppard RC, Bless DM. A method for improving measurement reliability in laryngeal videostroboscopy. J Voice 1990; 4 (03) 280-285 10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80023-2
- 3 Patel RR, Donohue KD, Lau D, Unnikrishnan H. In Vivo measurement of pediatric vocal fold motion using structured light laser projection. J Voice 2013; 27 (04) 463-472 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.03.004
- 4 Baier W, Burnett BA, Payne M, Warnett JM, Williams MA. Using micro-computed tomography to examine the larynx in cases of suspected strangulation-a comparison of case findings and control images. Int J Legal Med 2020; 134 (04) 1441-1450 10.1007/s00414-019-02194-y
- 5 El-Anwar MW, El-Hussiny A, Osman H, Mobasher MA. Tracheal and subglottic dimensions: a computed tomography cross section study of adult population. Egypt J Otolaryngol 2024; 40: 25 10.1186/s43163-024-00588-3
- 6 Nishizawa N, Sawashima M, Yonemoto K. Vocal fold length in vocal pitch change. In: Fujimura O. editor. Voice production, mechanisms and function. New York: Raven Press; 1988: 75-82 . (Vocal physiology; vol 2.)
- 7 Hill CA, Ojha S, Maturo S, Maurer R, Bunting G, Hartnick CJ. Consistency of voice frequency and perturbation measures in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (04) 637-641 10.1177/0194599813477829
- 8 Mobashir MK, Mohamed AERS, Quriba AS, Anany AM, Hassan EM. Linear measurements of vocal folds and laryngeal dimensions in freshly excised human larynges. J Voice 2018; 32 (05) 525-528 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.024
- 9 Hu Q, Zhu SY, Luo F, Gao Y, Yang XY. High-frequency sonographic measurements of true and false vocal cords. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29 (07) 1023-1030 10.7863/jum.2010.29.7.1023
- 10 Kim Y, Park JE, Kim JH. Plain Radiographic Analysis of Laryngeal Dimensions in Young Children: Normal versus Croup. Children (Basel) 2022; 9 (10) 1532 10.3390/children9101532
- 11 Su MC, Yeh TH, Tan CT, Lin CD, Linne OC, Lee SY. Measurement of adult vocal fold length. J Laryngol Otol 2002; 116 (06) 447-449 10.1258/0022215021911257
- 12 Clarós P, Sobolewska AZ, Doménech-Clarós A, Clarós-Pujol A, Pujol C, Clarós A. CT-based morphometric analysis of professional opera singers' vocal folds. J Voice 2019; 33 (04) 583.e1-583.e8 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.02.010
- 13 Mehta DD, Hillman RE. Current role of stroboscopy in laryngeal imaging. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 20 (06) 429-436 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283585f04
- 14 Kitzing P. Stroboscopy–a pertinent laryngological examination. J Otolaryngol 1985; 14 (03) 151-157
- 15 Andrade-Miranda G, Stylianou Y, Deliyski DD, Godino-Llorente JT, Bernardoni NH. Laryngeal image processing of vocal folds motion. Appl Sci (Basel) 2020; 10 (05) 1556 10.3390/app10051556
- 16 Litman RS, Weissend EE, Shibata D, Westesson PL. Developmental changes of laryngeal dimensions in unparalyzed, sedated children. Anesthesiology 2003; 98 (01) 41-45 10.1097/00000542-200301000-00010
- 17 Sankar GB, Merlino DJ, Wert CJW, Van Abel KM, Peraza LR, Yin LX. et al. The larynx in 3 dimensions: A digital anatomical model derived from radiographic imaging, refined with peer-reviewed literature, and optimized with medical illustration. Oper Tech Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg 2023; 34 (04) 263-280 10.1016/j.otot.2023.09.020
- 18 Hertegard S, Hakansson A, Thorstensen O. Vocal fold length measurements with computed tomography. Scand J Logop Phoniatr 1993; 18 (2–3): 57-63 10.3109/14015439309101350
- 19 Vorik A, Unteregger F, Zwicky S, Schiwowa J, Potthast S, Storck C. Three-dimensional imaging of high-resolution computer tomography of singers' larynges: A pilot study. J Voice 2017; 31 (01) 115.e17-115.e21 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.03.011
- 20 Eckel HE, Sittel C, Zorowka P, Jerke A. Dimensions of the laryngeal framework in adults. Surg Radiol Anat 1994; 16 (01) 31-36 10.1007/BF01627918
- 21 Eckel HE, Sittel C. Morphometry of the larynx in horizontal sections. Am J Otolaryngol 1995; 16 (01) 40-48 10.1016/0196-0709(95)90008-x
- 22 Rawal JD, Doshi BD, Kariya VB, Jadav HR, Patel MD. Morphometric study of vocal folds in Indian cadavers. BJKines-NJBAS. 2015; 7: 38-43
- 23 Roers F, Mürbe D, Sundberg J. Predicted singers' vocal fold lengths and voice classification-a study of x-ray morphological measures. J Voice 2009; 23 (04) 408-413 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.12.003