Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurotrauma
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810107
Original Article

Safety and Feasibility of Including the Fracture Level in the Fixation Construct for Traumatic Vertebral Fractures

1   Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shibin Elkom, Menoufia Governorate, Egypt
,
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shibin Elkom, Menoufia Governorate, Egypt
,
Nour Elnoamany
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shibin Elkom, Menoufia Governorate, Egypt
,
Alaa Elsisi
2   Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shibin Elkom, Menoufia Governorate, Egypt
,
Hisham Aborahma
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shibin Elkom, Menoufia Governorate, Egypt
› Author Affiliations

Funding None.
Preview

Abstract

Background

Management of spinal injuries is continuously evolving and the main surgical aim is to restore the spine integrity. Performing short-segment fixation (SSF) or long-segment fixation (LSF) is still under debate and there is limited data concerning the safety and value of including the fracture segment in the fixation construct.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective observational series included 69 patients ≥ 18 years who suffered unstable thoracic, lumbar, or thoracolumbar vertebral fractures that were treated with pedicle screws fixation from January 2021 to January 2024. The aim was to evaluate the safety and value of including the fracture level in the fixation construct; preoperative clinical and radiographic parameters (visual analog scale [VAS], Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], anterior vertebral body [AVB] height) were compared with the postoperative ones at discharge and after 12 months.

Results

The mean age was 32.61 ± 9.11 years. Males constituted 55.1%. Back pain was the predominant clinical presentation followed by lower limb weakness, 24.6%. L1 was the most commonly affected level (34.8%) followed by D12 (33.3%). SSF was done in 65.2% and 34.8% were operated with LSF. Patients operated with SSF showed less intraoperative blood loss and shorter operative duration. After 12 months, there was significant improvement in regards to VAS score, Cobb angle, ODI score, and AVB height (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

While treating vertebral fractures, provided that the pedicle walls are intact, incorporation of the fractured vertebra in the fixation construct can offer a safe, feasible, and effective method for intraoperative fracture reduction and correction of sagittal deformity, in addition to good stiffness, strong pullout strength, and maintained correction over time.

Note

This study was performed in the Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University Hospital.


Authors' Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that was in the conception; study design; execution; and acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. All authors took part in drafting, revising, and final approval of the article. This article has been read and approved by all authors and all agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.


Data Availability Statement

All data and materials included in this work are available.


Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the clinical research committee of the faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University (IRB approval number: 12/2024.SURG. 23) and it followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.




Publication History

Article published online:
05 August 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India