RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809920
Utility of PMMA-Based Cranioplasty Flap for the Reconstruction of Retromastoid Craniotomy Using a Single Standard Skull Model: A Low-Cost Alternative

Abstract
Introduction
Retrosigmoid suboccipital (RMSO) craniotomy is the most commonly used approach for lesions of cerebellopontine angle. The problem with RMSO craniotomy is the risk of injury to the transverse and sigmoid sinus during the fashioning of the craniotomy. This problem creates a craniectomy defect that is larger than the bone flap removed. Placement of such a bone flap would cause problems that are similar to the craniectomy defects. To avoid this complication, cranioplasty reconstruction is advised.
Objectives
In this study, we introduced a novel, low-cost technique for RMSO cranioplasty using a single standard polyvinyl chloride plastic skull model as a guide for cranioplasty flap development and observed the functional and cosmetic outcomes.
Results
None of the patients required reoperation, and there was no evidence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, bleeding, infection, or poor scar formation. No patient experienced undue incisional pain or headache at long-term follow-up. The patients and their family members were satisfied with the cosmetic results of the procedure.
Conclusion
This technique has been proven to be not only cost-effective but also time-saving and easily reproduced, which may be significantly relevant in countries such as India, where the financial burden of healthcare is very high. This study identifies long-term improvement in CSF leaks and the long-term advantage of polymethylmethacrylate closure with less postoperative incisional pain and headache and improvement retroauricular cosmesis.
Keywords
RMSO craniotomy - cranioplasty - cerebellopontine angle - PMMA cranioplasty - custom made implant - craniotomy defectPublikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
26. Juni 2025
© 2025. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Ballanre CA. The Same Points in the Surgery of the Brain and Its Membranes. London: Macmillan; 1907: 405-418
- 2 Krause F. Surgery of the Brain and Spinal Cord. Vienna, Austria: Urban & Schwarzenberg Bertin; 1911: 24-27
- 3 Cushing H. Tumors of the Nervus Acousticus and the Syndrome of the Cerebello-pontine Angle. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1917: 295
- 4 Dandy WE. Results of removal of acoustic tumours by the unilateral approach. Arch Surg 1941; 42: 1026-1033
- 5 Charnley J. Total hip replacement by low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1970; 72 (72) 7-21
- 6 Antonelli V, Maimone G, D'Andrea M, Tomassini A, Bassi M, Tosatto L. “Single-step” resection and cranio-orbital reconstruction for spheno-orbital metastasis with custom made implant. A case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2021; 81: 105755
- 7 Eppley BL. Alloplastic cranioplasty. Oper. Tech. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2002; 9: 16-22
- 8 Wahlig H, Dingeldein E, Bergmann R, Reuss K. The release of gentamicin from polymethylmethacrylate beads. An experimental and pharmacokinetic study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1978; 60-B (02) 270-275
- 9 Honeybul S, Morrison DA, Ho KM, Lind CR, Geelhoed E. A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty. J Neurosurg 2017; 126 (01) 81-90
- 10 Harner SG, Beatty CW, Ebersold MJ. Impact of cranioplasty on headache after acoustic neuroma removal. Neurosurgery 1995; 36 (06) 1097-1099 , discussion 1099–1100
- 11 Catalano PJ, Jacobowitz O, Post KD. Prevention of headache after retrosigmoid removal of acoustic tumors. Am J Otol 1996; 17 (06) 904-908
- 12 Schessel DA, Rowed DW, Nedzelski JM, Feghali JG. Postoperative pain following excision of acoustic neuroma by the suboccipital approach: observations on possible cause and potential amelioration. Am J Otol 1993; 14 (05) 491-494
- 13 Kimmel DL. Innervation of spinal dura mater and dura mater of the posterior cranial fossa. Neurology 1961; 11: 800-809
- 14 Huh R, Han IB, Moon JY, Chang JW, Chung SS. Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: analyses of operative complications in 1582 consecutive patients. Surg Neurol 2008; 69 (02) 153-157 , discussion 157
- 15 Dubey A, Sung WS, Shaya M. et al. Complications of posterior cranial fossa surgery–an institutional experience of 500 patients. Surg Neurol 2009; 72 (04) 369-375
- 16 Sarsam Z, Garcia-Fiñana M, Nurmikko TJ, Varma TR, Eldridge P. The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Neurosurg 2010; 24 (01) 18-25
- 17 Sekula RF, Marchan EM, Fletcher LH, Casey KF, Jannetta PJ. Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in elderly patients. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (04) 689-691
- 18 McLaughlin MR, Jannetta PJ, Clyde BL, Subach BR, Comey CH, Resnick DK. Microvascular decompression of cranial nerves: lessons learned after 4400 operations. J Neurosurg 1999; 90 (01) 1-8
- 19 Moskowitz SI, Liu J, Krishnaney AA. Postoperative complications associated with dural substitutes in suboccipital craniotomies. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (3, Suppl) ons28-ons33 , discussion ons33–ons34
- 20 Schiariti M, Acerbi F, Broggi M. et al. Two alternative dural sealing techniques in posterior fossa surgery: (Polylactide-co-glycolide) self-adhesive resorbable membrane versus polyethylene glycol hydrogel. Surg Neurol Int 2014; 5: 171
- 21 Jackler RK. Headache following acoustic neuroma surgery can be a real pain in the neck. Acoustic Neuroma Association Notes 1994; 49: 1-3
- 22 Teo MK, Eljamel MS. Role of craniotomy repair in reducing postoperative headaches after a retrosigmoid approach. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (05) 1286-1291 , discussion 1291–1292
- 23 Lovely TJ. The treatment of chronic incisional pain and headache after retromastoid craniectomy. Surg Neurol Int 2012; 3: 92
- 24 Rhoton AL Comment on: Harner SG, Beatty CW, Ebersold MJ. Impact of cranioplasty on headache after acoustic neuroma removal. Neurosurgery 1995; 36 (06) 1097-1099 ; discussion 1099–1100
- 25 Soumekh B, Levine SC, Haines SJ, Wulf JA. Retrospective study of postcraniotomy headaches in suboccipital approach: diagnosis and management. Am J Otol 1996; 17 (04) 617-619
- 26 Schessel DA, Nedzelski JM, Rowed D, Feghali JG. Pain after surgery for acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 107 (03) 424-429
- 27 Lethaus B, Bloebaum M, Koper D, Poort-Ter Laak M, Kessler P. Interval cranioplasty with patient-specific implants and autogenous bone grafts–success and cost analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42 (08) 1948-1951
- 28 Sarnii M, Harner SC, Beatty CW, Ebersold MJ. Impact of cranioplasty on headache after acoustic neuroma removal. Neuro Surg 1995; 36: 1100