No Time for That: Health Care Economics and Population Health Limitations of Anal Cancer Screening

Abstract

High-resolution anoscopy has become an integral component of recommended anal cancer screening in broad populations. While high-resolution anoscopy has been shown to decrease the rate of anal cancer in high-risk populations with known high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, it may have low utility as a broader population screening tool. Its applicability and implementation are limited by the current number of trained providers, high monetary costs, and high opportunity costs to patients and providers. Efforts to enhance its attractiveness should focus on decreasing the ratio of the number of procedures per available provider, better illustrating costs, and clear and precise national guidelines.

Keywords

high-resolution anoscopy - anal cancer - health care economics - screening - risk adjustment

Publication History

Article published online:
02 July 2025

• References

• 1 Palefsky JM, Lee JY, Jay N. et al.; ANCHOR Investigators Group. Treatment of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions to prevent anal cancer. N Engl J Med 2022; 386 (24) 2273-2282
• 2 Hirsch B, Fine SM, Vail R. et al.; on behalf of Medical Care Criteria Committee. Screening for Anal Dysplasia and Cancer in Adults with HIV. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University; 2022
• 3 Stier EA, Clarke MA, Deshmukh AA. et al. International Anal Neoplasia Society's consensus guidelines for anal cancer screening. Int J Cancer 2024; 154 (10) 1694-1702
• 4 Herman C. What makes a screening exam “good”?. Virtual Mentor 2006; 8 (01) 34-37
• 5 Davis MP, Vanenkevort E. Understanding the number needed to treat. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 68 (03) e190-e193
• 6 Gates TJ. Screening for cancer: evaluating the evidence. Am Fam Physician 2001; 63 (03) 513-522
• 7 Machalek DA, Poynten M, Jin F. et al. Anal human papillomavirus infection and associated neoplastic lesions in men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13 (05) 487-500
• 8 Bretthauer M, Løberg M, Wieszczy P. et al.; NordICC Study Group. Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death. N Engl J Med 2022; 387 (17) 1547-1556
• 9 Hendrick RE, Helvie MA. Mammography screening: a new estimate of number needed to screen to prevent one breast cancer death. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198 (03) 723-728
• 10 Neukam K, Milanés Guisado Y, Fontillón M. et al.; SeVIHanal Study Group. High-resolution anoscopy in HIV-infected men: Assessment of the learning curve and factors that improve the performance. Papillomavirus Res 2019; 7: 62-66
• 11 Rim SH, Saraiya M, Beer L, Tie Y, Yuan X, Weiser J. Access to high-resolution anoscopy among persons with HIV and abnormal anal cytology results. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7 (03) e240068
• 12 Plotzker RE, Barnell GM, Wiley DJ, Stier EA, Jay N. Provider preferences for anal cancer prevention screening: Results of the International Anal Neoplasia Society survey. Tumour Virus Res 2022; 13: 200235
• 13 Barnell GM, Schechter MS. Anal cancer screening and prevention-A new era, limited by access to high-resolution anoscopy. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7 (03) e240019
• 14 Hillman RJ, Gunathilake MP, Jin F, Tong W, Field A, Carr A. Ability to detect high-grade squamous anal intraepithelial lesions at high resolution anoscopy improves over time. Sex Health 2016; 13 (02) 177-181
• 15 Palefsky JM. Practising high-resolution anoscopy. Sex Health 2012; 9 (06) 580-586
• 16 Leeds IL, Fang SH. Anal cancer and intraepithelial neoplasia screening: A review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8 (01) 41-51
• 17 Albuquerque A. Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids: A guide for complications. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8 (09) 614-620
• 18 Sanger CB, Kalbfell E, Cherney-Stafford L, Striker R, Alagoz E. A qualitative study of barriers to anal cancer screenings in US veterans living with HIV. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2023; 37 (09) 436-446
• 19 Jay N. High-resolution anoscopy: Procedure and findings. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 28 (02) 75-80
• 20 Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M. Understanding costs of care in the operating room. JAMA Surg 2018; 153 (04) e176233
• 21 Saving.org. Inflation Calculator. 2024. Accessed August 11, 2024 at: https://www.saving.org/inflation/
• 22 Policy Explainer. Facility Fees and How They Affect Health Care Prices. Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy. 2023. Accessed August 8, 2024 at: https://healthcostinstitute.org/hcci-originals-dropdown/all-hcci-reports/facility-fee-explainer
• 23 Squeo GC, Geba MC, Kane WJ. et al. Impact of a high-resolution anoscopy clinic on management of anal dysplasia in women living with HIV. Am Surg 2023; 89 (11) 4689-4695
• 24 Moeckli B, Canner J, Najafian A. et al. High-resolution anoscopy, is there a benefit in proceeding directly to the operating room?. Tech Coloproctol 2021; 25 (04) 461-466
• 25 Liang B, Zhao J, Kim Y. et al. Scattering-based light-sheet microscopy imaging of human papillomavirus-associated squamous lesions of the anal canal: A proof-of-principle study. Mod Pathol 2024; 37 (06) 100493
• 26 Siegenbeek van Heukelom ML, Marra E, de Vries HJC, Schim van der Loeff MF, Prins JM. Risk factors for anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-positive MSM: is targeted screening possible?. AIDS 2017; 31 (16) 2295-2301
• 27 Sohail AH, Ye IB, Martinez KA. et al. Colon and rectal surgery fellowship applicant and matching trends in the United States: An analysis of national resident matching program data. Am Surg 2024; 90 (05) 985-990
• 28 CMS.GOV. Physician Fee Schedule. January 2024 release. 2024. Accessed June 9, 2025 at: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/fee-schedules/physician/pfs-relative-value-files/rvu24a
• 29 CMS.GOV. Physician Fee Schedule. January 2023. Accessed June 16, 2025 at: https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2022-23873.pdf
• 30 McDermott KW, Liang L. Statistical Brief #281: Overview of Operating Room Procedures During Inpatient Stays in United States Hospital, 2018. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2021.
• 31 hiv.gov. Managing your HIV medical appointments. 2024. Accessed June 16, 2025 at: https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/staying-in-hiv-care/provider-visits-and-lab-test/seeing-your-health-care-provider
• 32 Maciel RA, Klück HM, Durand M, Sprinz E. Comorbidity is more common and occurs earlier in persons living with HIV than in HIV-uninfected matched controls, aged 50 years and older: A cross-sectional study. Int J Infect Dis 2018; 70: 30-35
• 33 Wells J, Flowers L, Mehta CC. et al. Follow-up to high-resolution anoscopy after abnormal anal cytology in people living with HIV. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2022; 36 (07) 263-271
• 34 Assoumou SA, Mayer KH, Panther L, Linas BP, Kim J. Cost-effectiveness of surveillance strategies after treatment for high-grade anal dysplasia in high-risk patients. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40 (04) 298-303
• 35 Deshmukh AA, Chiao EY, Cantor SB. et al. Management of precancerous anal intraepithelial lesions in human immunodeficiency virus-positive men who have sex with men: Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Cancer 2017; 123 (23) 4709-4719
• 36 Tong WW, Jin F, McHugh LC. et al. Progression to and spontaneous regression of high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-infected and uninfected men. AIDS 2013; 27 (14) 2233-2243
• 37 Wu CF, Xu L, Fu S, Peng HL, Messick CA, Lairson DR. Health care costs of anal cancer in a commercially insured population in the United States. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2018; 24 (11) 1156-1164
• 38 NIH National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat Facts. Anal Cancer. 2024. Accessed August 27, 2024 at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/anus.html
• 39 Chen SY, Leeds IL, Cerullo M. et al. Anal cancer screening attitudes and practices in Maryland healthcare providers: Implications for national trends. J Surg Oncol 2019; 2: 1-7