RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809642
General Overview of Intracranial Meningiomas: 11 Years of Experience in an Oncological Reference Center
Visão geral dos meningiomas intracranianos: Experiência de 11 anos em um centro de referência oncológica
Abstract
Objective
To perform the clinical and therapeutic follow-up of patients with meningioma and to evaluate the risk and protective factors for the outcomes obtained during the treatment.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using clinical, radiological, and histopathological data contained in the records of patients with meningiomas; we also performed retrospective monitoring for 5 years, evaluating the initial symptoms and clinical evolution, demographic data, risk factors, location, laterality and dimensions, treatment, complete radiological resection, death, additional deficits, and changes in the performance score.
Results
We followed up a sample of 86 patients with a mean age of 47 years and a predominance of female subjects. The most frequent histological types were the meningothelial, followed by the fibrous, the transitional subtype, and the mixed and psamomatous subtypes. Grade-II and -III injuries represented 8.13% and 3.12% of the total respectively. The initial clinical conditions presented nonspecific signs in 79% of the individuals and focal neurological signs in 12%, the most common being appendicular deficit, unilateral amaurosis, and cranial nerve syndrome. Regarding treatment distribution, all patients studied underwent surgical resection (Simpson 1: 15%; Simpson 2: 12%; Simpson 3: 35%; and Simpson 4: 36%), with a good correlation of the total radiological resection for the first 3 degrees.
Conclusion
Thus, the need for early diagnosis and therapy is emphasized to achieve a better outcome, and we recommend the performance of prospective studies that evaluate other variables to clarify the risk factors for mortality and recurrence.
Resumo
Objetivo
Realizar o acompanhamento clínico e terapêutico de pacientes com meningioma e avaliar os fatores de risco e protetores para os desfechos obtidos durante o tratamento.
Materiais e Métodos
Conduziu-se um estudo de coorte retrospectivo em que foram utilizados os dados clínicos, radiológicos e histopatológicos dos registros de pacientes com meningiomas, e foi realizado um acompanhamento retrospectivo de 5 anos, com avaliação dos sintomas iniciais e da evolução clínica, dados demográficos, fatores de risco, localização, lateralidade e dimensões, tratamento, ressecção radiológica completa, óbito, déficits adicionais e alterações na pontuação de desempenho.
Resultados
Foi acompanhada uma amostra de 86 pacientes com idade média de 47 anos e predominância do sexo feminino. Os tipos histológicos mais frequentes foram o meningotelial, seguido pelo fibroso, o subtipo de transição e os subtipos misto e psamomatoso. As lesões de graus II e III representaram 8,13% e 3,12% do total, respectivamente. As condições clínicas iniciais apresentaram sinais inespecíficos em 79% dos indivíduos e sinais neurológicos focais em 12%, sendo os mais comuns o déficit apendicular, amaurose unilateral e síndrome do nervo craniano. Na distribuição do tratamento, todos os pacientes estudados foram submetidos à ressecção cirúrgica (Simpson 1: 15%; Simpson 2: 12%; Simpson 3: 35%; e Simpson 4: 36%), com boa correlação da ressecção radiológica total para os primeiros 3 graus.
Conclusão
Assim, enfatiza-se a necessidade de diagnóstico e terapia precoces para se alcançar um melhor resultado, e recomenda-se a realização de estudos prospectivos que avaliem outras variáveis para esclarecer os fatores de risco para mortalidade e recorrência.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 02. November 2024
Angenommen: 28. März 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. Juli 2025
© 2025. Sociedade Brasileira de Neurocirurgia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Marchand AA, O'Shaughnessy J. Subtle clinical signs of a meningioma in an adult: a case report. Chiropr Man Therap 2014; 22 (01) 8
- 2 Blanco IV, Martín JG, Ortega CG, Desviat PV, López-Navas PM. Concordancia radio-histológica en meningiomas intracraneales. Sanid Mil 2018; 74 (04) 248-254
- 3 Colli BO, Carlotti Junior CG, Assirati Junior JA, Coelho Junior VdP, Neder L. Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas in a public hospital in São Paulo State, Brazil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2015; 73 (09) 770-778
- 4 Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D. et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro-oncol 2021; 23 (08) 1231-1251
- 5 Perry A, Gutmann DH, Reifenberger G. Molecular pathogenesis of meningiomas. J Neurooncol 2004; 70 (02) 183-202
- 6 Takahashi JA, Ueba T, Hashimoto N, Nakashima Y, Katsuki N. The combination of mitotic and Ki-67 indices as a useful method for predicting short-term recurrence of meningiomas. Surg Neurol 2004; 61 (02) 149-155 , discussion 155–156
- 7 Silveira MAd, Ferreira WAS, Amorim CKN, Brito JRN, Kayath AS, Sagica FdES, Oliveira EHCd. Meningiomas: An Overview of the Landscape of Copy Number Alterations in Samples from an Admixed Population. J Oncol 2020; 2020: 3821695
- 8 Trott G, Pereira-Lima JFS, Leães CGS, Ferreira NP, Barbosa-Coutinho LM, Oliveira MC. Abundant immunohistochemical expression of dopamine D2 receptor and p53 protein in meningiomas: follow-up, relation to gender, age, tumor grade, and recurrence. Braz J Med Biol Res 2015; 48 (05) 415-419
- 9 Kalfas F, Scudieri C. Neurosurgical Management of Parasagittal and Falcine Meningiomas: Judicious Modern Optimization of the Results in a 100-Case Study. Asian J Neurosurg 2019; 14 (04) 1138-1143
- 10 Heiss W-D, Raab P, Lanfermann H. Multimodality assessment of brain tumors and tumor recurrence. J Nucl Med 2011; 52 (10) 1585-1600
- 11 Varlotto J, Flickinger J, Pavelic MT, Specht CS, Sheehan JM, Timek DT. et al. Distinguishing grade I meningioma from higher grade meningiomas without biopsy. Oncotarget 2015; 6 (35) 38421-38428
- 12 Sanjuán A, Price CJ, Mancini L, Josse G, Grogan A, Yamamoto AK. et al. Automated identification of brain tumors from single MR images based on segmentation with refined patient-specific priors. Front Neurosci 2013; 7: 241
- 13 Wu Q-W, Yan R-F, Li Q, Hu Y, Zhou F-M, Ren J-P. et al. Magnetic resonance image manifestations of the atypical meningioma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013; 14 (11) 6337-6340
- 14 Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, Von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK. et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016; 131 (06) 803-820
- 15 Rogers L, Barani I, Chamberlain M, Kaley TJ, McDermott M, Raizer J. et al. Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (01) 4-23
- 16 Corrêa ACdS, Hermes Júnior MdN, Jesus JMd, Mussy JHA. Risk Factors for Hospital Mortality and Malignancy in Meningiomas. Braz J Neurocir 2014; 25 (01) 24-29
- 17 Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA. Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 1984; 2 (03) 187-193
- 18 Simpson D. The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1957; 20 (01) 22-39
- 19 Park JK. Epidemiology, pathology, clinical features, and diagnosis of meningioma. UpToDate; 2020 . Available from: http://maadi-clinical.byethost8.com/d/topic.htm?path=epidemiology-pathology-clinical-features-and-diagnosis-of-meningioma&i=1
- 20 Brandis A, Mirzai S, Tatagiba M, Walter GF, Samii M, Ostertag H. Immunohistochemical detection of female sex hormone receptors in meningiomas: correlation with clinical and histological features. Neurosurgery 1993; 33 (02) 212-217 , discussion 217–218
- 21 Guillermo PC, Fernando DA, Jorge ACD, Oscarlyns CN, Hernández AV. Intracraneal meningiona surgery at the Neurosurgery Service. Rev Chil Neuro-psiquiatr 2009; 47 (02) 124-131
- 22 Acurio-Padilla PE. Caracterización de los meningiomas intracraneales en pacientes operados em el Hospital Universitario “General Calixto García”. La Habana: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana; 2017
- 23 Benítez EMS, Pérez MQL, Estévez MLM, Sánchez RG, Román GH. Meningiomas intracraneales. Experiencia de dos años en el servicio Neurocirugía de Matanzas. Rev Méd Electrón 2019; 41 (06) 1367-1381
- 24 Sughrue ME, Rutkowski MJ, Shangari G, Parsa AT, Berger MS, McDermott MW. Results with judicious modern neurosurgical management of parasagittal and falcine meningiomas. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (03) 731-737
- 25 Afumu CN, Ramos JFR, Villalonga OLR, Rodríguez IA, Corrales AMB. Los meningiomas intracraneales recidivantes postquirúrgicos. Rev Cienc Méd 2014; 18 (02) 231-243
- 26 Torres LFB, Madalozzo LE, Werner B, Noronha Ld, Jacob GV, Medeiros BC, Vialle EN. Meningiomas. Estudo epidemiológico e anátomo-patológico de 304 casos. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1996; 54 (04) 549-556
- 27 Mascarenhas L, Fonseca M, Honavar M, Romão H, Resende M, Vaz AR. Analysis of the influence of the variable size on the characteristics and behavior of meningiomas. Neurocirugia (Astur) 2005; 16 (06) 486-491
- 28 Nakasu S, Nakajima M, Matsumura K, Nakasu Y, Handa J. Meningioma: proliferating potential and clinicoradiological features. Neurosurgery 1995; 37 (06) 1049-1055
- 29 Ajler P, Beltrame S, Massa D, Tramontano J, Baccanelli M, Yampolsky C. Relevancia de los grados de Simpson en la resección de meningiomas grado I. Surg Neurol Int 2017; 8 (Suppl. 02) S5-S10 [Article in Spanish]
- 30 Jensen R, Lee J. Predicting outcomes of patients with intracranial meningiomas using molecular markers of hypoxia, vascularity, and proliferation. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (01) 146-156
- 31 Mirimanoff RO, Dosoretz DE, Linggood RM, Ojemann RG, Martuza RL. Meningioma: analysis of recurrence and progression following neurosurgical resection. J Neurosurg 1985; 62 (01) 18-24
- 32 El-Khatib M, El Majdoub F, Hoevels M, Kocher M, Müller R-P, Steiger H-J. et al. Stereotactic LINAC radiosurgery for incompletely resected or recurrent atypical and anaplastic meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153 (09) 1761-1767
- 33 Brain tumours (primary) and brain metastases in adults. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2021
- 34 Soyuer S, Chang EL, Selek U, Shi W, Maor MH, DeMonte F. Radiotherapy after surgery for benign cerebral meningioma. Radiother Oncol 2004; 71 (01) 85-90
- 35 Mair R, Morris K, Scott I, Carroll TA. Radiotherapy for atypical meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (04) 811-819
- 36 Komotar RJ, Iorgulescu JB, Raper DMS, Holland EC, Beal K, Bilsky MH. et al. The role of radiotherapy following gross-total resection of atypical meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2012; 117 (04) 679-686
- 37 Aghi MK, Carter BS, Cosgrove GR, Ojemann RG, Amin-Hanjani S, Martuza RL. et al. Long-term recurrence rates of atypical meningiomas after gross total resection with or without postoperative adjuvant radiation. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (01) 56-60 , discussion 60