Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809443
Artificial Intelligence in Dental Imaging Practice among Oral Radiologists from the City of Chennai: A Qualitative Analysis
Authors
Abstract
Background
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to significantly transform the role of the doctor and revolutionize the practice of medicine and radiology. Studies have documented the clinical potentials of AI in medical imaging practice to improving patient care. There are no studies done in India that assess the attitude and perspectives of oral radiologists toward AI in dental radiology.
Aim
The present study aimed to identify barriers and enablers for the implementation of AI in dental radiology.
Materials & Methods
The study employs a qualitative design using an open-ended instrument. The sample size was 35 oral radiologists who were working within the district of Chennai and convenience/snowball sampling was done. Data obtained were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Six themes of concerns were generated: expectant tool; career insecurity; cost of new technology; equipment preservation and data insecurity; service delivery quality; need for expanding AI awareness. A questionnaire developed along the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Capabilities, Opportunities, and Motivations influencing Behaviors model was used to guide interviews. Mayring's content analysis was employed to point out barriers and enablers.
Results
In the current study, nine themes were identified as enablers, four as conflicting themes, and seven as barriers for the acceptance of AI-integrated radiology. The factors that influence the radiology field and their attitude toward the introduction of AI in dental radiology were assessed thoroughly. Both stakeholders emphasized chances and hopes for AI along with marginal fear of job insecurity. A range of enablers for implementing AI in dental diagnostics was identified (e.g., the chance for higher diagnostic accuracy, a reduced workload, more comprehensive reporting, and better patient–provider communication).
Conclusion
AI has an important role to play in the global health care setting. The current study reported the attitudes and apprehensions of oral radiologists toward AI integration in radiology. Decision-makers and radiology industry may want to consider the barriers and conflicting themes that appear as challenges to foster implementation of AI in dentistry.
Data Availability Statement
The data will be made available upon request to the author.
Ethical Approval
The ethical approval was obtained from the IEC of SRM dental college with approval number (SDC/2024/013).
Publication History
Article published online:
11 June 2025
© 2025. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Pesapane F, Codari M, Sardanelli F. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: threat or opportunity? Radiologists again at the forefront of innovation in medicine. Eur Radiol Exp 2018; 2 (01) 35
- 2 Hinton G. Deep learning-a technology with the potential to transform health care. JAMA 2018; 320 (11) 1101-1102
- 3 Lewis SJ, Gandomkar Z, Brennan PC. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging practice: looking to the future. J Med Radiat Sci 2019; 66 (04) 292-295
- 4 Glaser B, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine; Chicago: 1967
- 5 Coenen M, Stamm TA, Stucki G, Cieza A. Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of two qualitative methods. Qual Life Res 2012; 21 (02) 359-370
- 6 Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C. et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health 2010; 25 (10) 1229-1245
- 7 Morse WC, Lowery DR, Steury T. Exploring saturation of themes and spatial locations in qualitative public participation geographic information systems research. Soc Nat Resour 2014; 27 (05) 557-571
- 8 Krueger RA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1988
- 9 Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med 2022; 292: 114523
- 10 Müller A, Mertens SM, Göstemeyer G, Krois J, Schwendicke F. Barriers and enablers for artificial intelligence in dental diagnostics: a qualitative study. J Clin Med 2021; 10 (08) 1612
- 11 Antwi WK, Akudjedu TN, Botwe BO. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging practice in Africa: a qualitative content analysis study of radiographers' perspectives. Insights Imaging 2021; 12 (01) 80
- 12 Ciompi F, Chung K, van Riel SJ. et al. Towards automatic pulmonary nodule management in lung cancer screening with deep learning. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 46479
- 13 Nibali A, He Z, Wollersheim D. Pulmonary nodule classification with deep residual networks. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2017; 12 (10) 1799-1808
- 14 Herweh C, Ringleb PA, Rauch G. et al. Performance of e-ASPECTS software in comparison to that of stroke physicians on assessing CT scans of acute ischemic stroke patients. Int J Stroke 2016; 11 (04) 438-445
- 15 Hinton G. Deep learning-a technology with the potential to transform health care. JAMA 2018; 320 (11) 1101-1102
- 16 Bal M, Amasyali MF, Sever H, Kose G, Demirhan A. Performance evaluation of the machine learning algorithms used in inference mechanism of a medical decision support system. ScientificWorldJournal 2014; 2014: 137896
- 17 Meskó B, Hetényi G, Győrffy Z. Will artificial intelligence solve the human resource crisis in healthcare?. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18 (01) 545
- 18 Chan S, Siegel EL. Will machine learning end the viability of radiology as a thriving medical specialty?. Br J Radiol 2019; 92 (1094) 20180416
- 19 Amisha MP, Malik P, Pathania M, Rathaur VK. Overview of artificial intelligence in medicine. J Family Med Prim Care 2019; 8 (07) 2328-2331
- 20 Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJWL. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer 2018; 18 (08) 500-510
- 21 Botwe BO, Akudjedu TN, Antwi WK. et al. The integration of artificial intelligence in medical imaging practice: perspectives of African radiographers. Radiography (Lond) 2021; 27 (03) 861-866
- 22 Davenport T, Kalakota R. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J 2019; 6 (02) 94-98
- 23 Low LL, Lee KH, Hock Ong ME. et al. Predicting 30-day readmissions: performance of the LACE index compared with a regression model among general medicine patients in Singapore. BioMed Res Int 2015; 2015: 169870
- 24 Nait Aicha A, Englebienne G, van Schooten KS, Pijnappels M, Kröse B. Deep learning to predict falls in older adults based on daily-Life trunk accelerometry. Sensors (Basel) 2018; 18 (05) 1654
- 25 Char DS, Shah NH, Magnus D. Implementing machine learning in health care – addressing ethical challenges. N Engl J Med 2018; 378 (11) 981-983

