Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2025; 83(06): s00451809407
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809407
Original Article

Prognostic factors in ALS: different approaches to the same problem

Authors

  • Maria Cristina Vázquez

    1   Universidad de la República, Hospital de Clínicas, Departamento de Neurología, Montevideo, Uruguay.
  • Abayubá Perna

    1   Universidad de la República, Hospital de Clínicas, Departamento de Neurología, Montevideo, Uruguay.
  • Mariana Legnani

    1   Universidad de la República, Hospital de Clínicas, Departamento de Neurología, Montevideo, Uruguay.
  • Gustavo Saona

    2   Investigator independiente, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Preview

Abstract

Background

The natural history of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the prognoses, and the survival times are fields of considerable interest that are scarcely studied in South American countries.

Objective

To describe the survival of a representative cohort of Uruguayan ALS patients, and to identify covariates associated with survival using different analyses.

Methods

Survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Different Cox proportional hazards functions were used to identify independent prognostic predictors since the diagnosis: classic, stratified, and truncated.

Results

We included 166 definite and probable ALS patients. The median follow-up was of 13.6 years. An analysis was performed according to the recruitment groups: prevalent, exhaustive incident, and non-exhaustive incident cases. The median survival since the diagnosis was longer in the prevalent group (33 months) than in the exhaustive incident (22 months) and non-exhaustive incident (14 months) groups. The median survival time of the entire cohort from onset to death was 37 months and 23 months from the diagnosis. Factors related to survival from diagnosis to death were: age at onset, bulbar region onset, clinical form, and progression rate.

Conclusion

The present study described the role of clinical and demographic factors in ALS survival in the Uruguayan population and shed light on differences involving survival models and the temporal bias produced by the lack of precision in determining the onset of the disease.

Authors' Contributions

Conceptualization: MCV, AP, ML, GS; Data curation: AP, GS; Formal analysis: MCV, AP, GS; Investigation: MCV, AP; Methodology: MCV, AP, GS; Supervision: GS; Validation: MCV; Writing – original draft: MCV, AP, ML; Writing – review & editing: MCV, AP, ML, GS.


Editor-in-Chief: Ayrton Roberto Massaro. 0000-0002-0487-5299


Associate Editor: Wilson Marques Jr. 0000-0002-4589-2749




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 17. September 2024

Angenommen: 06. April 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. Juni 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil

Bibliographical Record
Maria Cristina Vázquez, Abayubá Perna, Mariana Legnani, Gustavo Saona. Prognostic factors in ALS: different approaches to the same problem. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2025; 83: s00451809407.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809407