RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809390
Incidence and Risk Factors of Sacroiliac Joint Pain Following Lumbar Surgery with and without Fusion in Patients with Spinal Stenosis and Low-Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial
Autor*innen
Abstract
Introduction
Failed back surgery syndrome affects 10 to 46% of lumbar spine surgery patients, often resulting in persistent pain and functional impairment. Sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP) is a significant contributor, particularly following spinal fusion. This study aimed to assess SIJP incidence following lumbar surgery with and without fusion, and identify risk factors for sacroiliac joint syndrome (SIJS).
Materials and Methods
This prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial included 102 patients undergoing lumbar decompression alone (Dec group, n = 50) or decompression with fusion (DecPlus group, n = 52) at two university hospitals. Patients with persistent postoperative pain were assessed for SIJS using clinical provocative tests and fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint blocks. Primary outcomes included SIJP incidence, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for disability, and Short-Form (SF)-36 Health Survey for quality of life. Patients were followed for 3 months postoperatively.
Results
SIJP was diagnosed in 36.3% of patients, with significantly higher incidence in the DecPlus group (50%) compared with the Dec group (22%) (p < 0.01). Pain scores (VAS) improved significantly in both groups, but ODI and SF-36 scores showed greater improvement in the Dec group (p < 0.01). SIJP has a significant relation with the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and length of fusion; however, extension of fusion to S1 does not significantly increase the SIJP. There was no significant association between SIJP and smoking, body mass index, or other comorbidities.
Conclusion
Based on our study, lumbar instrumented posterolateral fusion, compared with decompression without fusion, should be considered a risk factor for SIJP. In patients with instrumented fusion, the UIV and the length of fusion are related to SIJP; however, extending fusion to S1 does not significantly affect SIJP incidence.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. Juni 2025
© 2025. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Daniell JR, Osti OL. Failed back surgery syndrome: a review article. Asian Spine J 2018; 12 (02) 372-379
- 2 Sebaaly A, Lahoud M-J, Rizkallah M, Kreichati G, Kharrat K. Etiology, evaluation, and treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Asian Spine J 2018; 12 (03) 574-585
- 3 Chan CW, Peng P. Failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med 2011; 12 (04) 577-606
- 4 Alizadeh R, Sharifzadeh SR. Pathogenesis, etiology and treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Neurochirurgie 2022; 68 (04) 426-431
- 5 Unoki E, Miyakoshi N, Abe E, Kobayashi T, Abe T, Shimada Y. Sacroiliac joint pain after multiple-segment lumbar fusion: a long-term observational study-non-fused sacrum vs. fused sacrum. Spine Surg Relat Res 2017; 1 (02) 90-95
- 6 Longo UG, Loppini M, Berton A, Laverde L, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Degenerative changes of the sacroiliac joint after spinal fusion: an evidence-based systematic review. Br Med Bull 2014; 112 (01) 47-56
- 7 Ha KY, Lee JS, Kim KW. Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up. Spine 2008; 33 (11) 1192-1198
- 8 Falowski S, Sayed D, Pope J. et al. A review and algorithm in the diagnosis and treatment of sacroiliac joint pain. J Pain Res 2020; 13: 3337-3348
- 9 Braun J, Sieper J, Bollow M. Imaging of sacroiliitis. Clin Rheumatol 2000; 19 (01) 51-57
- 10 Geijer M, Göthlin GG, Göthlin JH. The clinical utility of computed tomography compared to conventional radiography in diagnosing sacroiliitis. A retrospective study on 910 patients and literature review. J Rheumatol 2007; 34 (07) 1561-1565
- 11 Ozgocmen S, Bozgeyik Z, Kalcik M, Yildirim A. The value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in early active sacroiliitis. Clin Rheumatol 2008; 27 (10) 1275-1282
- 12 Slobodin G, Hussein H, Rosner I, Eshed I. Sacroiliitis - early diagnosis is key. J Inflamm Res 2018; 11: 339-344
- 13 Slipman CW, Whyte II WS, Chow DW, Chou L, Lenrow D, Ellen M. Sacroiliac joint syndrome. Pain Physician 2001; 4 (02) 143-152
- 14 Haldeman KO, Sotohall R. The diagnosis and treatment of sacro-iliac conditions by the injection of procaine (Novocain). J Bone Joint Surg 1938; 20 (03) 675-685
- 15 Maigne JY, Planchon CA. Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks. Eur Spine J 2005; 14 (07) 654-658
- 16 Laslett M. Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of the painful sacroiliac joint. J Man Manip Ther 2008; 16 (03) 142-152
- 17 Tofuku K, Koga H, Komiya S. The diagnostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography for severe sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Eur Spine J 2015; 24 (04) 859-863
- 18 Pipikos T, Kassimos D, Angelidis G, Koutsikos J. Bone single photon emission/computed tomography in the detection of sacroiliitis in seronegative spondyloarthritis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2017; 26 (03) 101-109
- 19 Cusi M, Saunders J, Van der Wall H, Fogelman I. Metabolic disturbances identified by SPECT-CT in patients with a clinical diagnosis of sacroiliac joint incompetence. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (07) 1674-1682
- 20 Dharia AA, Guillotte AR, De Stefano FA, Rouse AG, Ohiorhenuan IE. Biomechanical predictors of sacroiliac joint uptake on single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. World Neurosurg 2024; 188: e606-e612
- 21 Davis H. Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery in the United States, 1979-1990. Spine 1994; 19 (10) 1117-1123 , discussion 1123–1124
- 22 Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK. Spinal-fusion surgery - the case for restraint. N Engl J Med 2004; 350 (07) 722-726
- 23 Baber Z, Erdek MA. Failed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives. J Pain Res 2016; 9: 979-987
- 24 Longo UG, Loppini M, Berton A, Laverde L, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Degenerative changes of the sacroiliac joint after spinal fusion: an evidence-based systematic review. Br Med Bull 2014; 112 (01) 47-56
- 25 Fritsch EW, Heisel J, Rupp S. The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments. Spine 1996; 21 (05) 626-633
- 26 Guyer RD, Patterson M, Ohnmeiss DD. Failed back surgery syndrome: diagnostic evaluation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006; 14 (09) 534-543
- 27 Ohtori S, Sainoh T, Takaso M. et al. Clinical incidence of sacroiliac joint arthritis and pain after sacropelvic fixation for spinal deformity. Yonsei Med J 2012; 53 (02) 416-421
- 28 Kumar N, Shah SM, Tan PK. Discography. Tech Orthop 2013; 28 (01) 73-77
- 29 Unoki E, Abe E, Murai H, Kobayashi T, Abe T. Fusion of multiple segments can increase the incidence of sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion. Spine 2016; 41 (12) 999-1005
- 30 Lee YC, Lee R, Harman C. The incidence of new onset sacroiliac joint pain following lumbar fusion. J Spine Surg 2019; 5 (03) 310-314
- 31 Koheil A, Dorgham D, Shaban MJPAJoN. Sacroiliitis following lumbosacral fixation. Prevalence and Management. 2021; 16 (01) 2-5
- 32 Sandén B, Försth P, Michaëlsson K. Smokers show less improvement than nonsmokers two years after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a study of 4555 patients from the Swedish spine register. Spine 2011; 36 (13) 1059-1064
- 33 Ahmed SI, Javed G, Bareeqa SB. et al. Comparison of decompression alone versus decompression with fusion for stenotic lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus 2018; 10 (08) e3135
- 34 Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T. et al. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (15) 1413-1423
- 35 Austevoll IM, Gjestad R, Brox JI. et al. The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Eur Spine J 2017; 26 (02) 404-413
