Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809327
A Comparative Analysis of Radiographic Intervertebral Disc Height Following Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Interlaminar versus Transforaminal Approach
Authors
Abstract
Study Design
This is a retrospective cohort study.
Introduction
Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD), a minimally invasive surgical procedure used to treat lumbar disc herniation (LDH), has been shown to be highly effective with fewer complications. This procedure can be performed using the interlaminar (IL) or transforaminal (TF) approach. The IL approach involves more anatomical structures than the TF approach. However, comprehensive data regarding preoperative and postoperative intervertebral disc height (IDH) changes for patients undergoing full-endoscopic discectomy through the IL versus the TF approach is yet to be documented.
Objective
To compare the preoperative and postoperative IDH on radiographs in patients who underwent the FELD using the IL or TF approach.
Materials and Methods
The medical records of patients diagnosed with LDH who underwent FELD between 2014 and 2022 were collected and analyzed. Pre- and postradiographic IDH and clinical scores, including visual analog scale-back pain (VAS-B), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and recurrent LDH, were assessed and compared over a follow-up period of at least 2 years.
Results
A total of 110 patients were included, 82 undergoing the IL procedure and 28 undergoing the TF procedure. The median IDH variance was consistent at 1.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.5, 2) for the IL and TF procedures, indicating no significant statistical variance. The IDH ratio was also comparable between the two groups, with the IL group at 84% and the TF group at 85%. However, a notable disparity was observed in postoperative IDH, with a median of 7.5 (IQR 6.5, 8.5) for the IL approach and 8.5 (IQR 7, 9.5) for the TF approach. Importantly, no statistical differences were found in clinical outcomes, including VAS-B, ODI, and recurrent LDH.
Conclusion
After a 2-year follow-up for FELD, there is no significant difference in radiographic outcomes, IDH difference, and IDH ratio between the IL and TF approaches. Additionally, there is no apparent correlation between reductions in IDH and IDH ratio and the decrease in back pain scores (VAS-B) or ODI after the procedures.
Keywords
intervertebral disc height - lumbar disc herniation - radiographic - full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy - interlaminar - transforaminalEthical Approval
The study was approved by the ethics committee of Lerdsin Hospital.
Publication History
Article published online:
21 May 2025
© 2025. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Vialle LR, Vialle EN, Suárez Henao JE, Giraldo G. Lumbar disc herniation. Rev Bras Ortop 2015; 45 (01) 17-22
- 2 Pruttikul P, Chobchai W, Pluemvitayaporn T, Kunakornsawat S, Piyaskulkaew C, Kittithamvongs P. Comparison of post-operative wound pain between interlaminar and transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery: which is superior?. Our J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2021; 6: 24-26
- 3 Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. J Neurosurg 1964; 21 (01) 74-81
- 4 Williams RW. Microlumbar discectomy: a conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc. Spine 1978; 3 (02) 175-182
- 5 Keorochana G. Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Transforaminal Technique. In: The Textbook of Spine. Vol 49 Bangkok: Spine Society of Thailand; 2022: 349
- 6 Keorochana G. Pruttikul Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Surgical Technique. In: The Textbook of Spine. Vol 50 Bangkok: Spine Society of Thailand; 2022: 350-366
- 7 Mochida J, Nishimura K, Nomura T, Toh E, Chiba M. The importance of preserving disc structure in surgical approaches to lumbar disc herniation. Spine 1996; 21 (13) 1556-1563 , discussion 1563–1564
- 8 Heo JH, Kim CH, Chung CK. et al. Quantity of disc removal and radiological outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Pain Physician 2017; 20 (05) E737-E746
- 9 Lin RH, Chen HC, Pan HC. et al. Efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for pediatric lumbar disc herniation and degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging: case series and literature review. J Int Med Res 2021; 49 (01) 300060520986685
- 10 Wilke HJ, Rohlmann F, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Werner K, Claes L, Kettler A. Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: part I. Lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2006; 15 (06) 720-730
