Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809180
Innovations Driving the Future of Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Part I: The Technological Leap in Maxillofacial Rehabilitation

Abstract
Maxillofacial prosthetics is a specialized field focused on replacing part or all of the facial and cranial structures. In recent years, digital technology has gained popularity over traditional methods for fabricating maxillofacial prostheses. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive review of recent innovations in maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation, with an emphasis on emerging technologies and their impact on patient outcomes, treatment efficiency, and overall quality of life.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across the Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases for studies published in English within the last decade. The keywords utilized included “Maxillofacial Prosthesis Implantation,” “Maxillofacial Prosthesis,” and “rehabilitation,” as well as “Virtual Rehabilitation,” “Artificial intelligence,” and “digital technology.” The initial search yielded 178 articles. After resolving 51 duplicates, 127 articles were screened based on titles and abstracts. Following full-text assessment, 81 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review.
The results indicated that advancements in digital technologies, digital imaging, data acquisition, and the integration of digital workflows have significantly transformed the rehabilitation of maxillofacial prosthetics. These innovations enabled customization and personalization, provided an improved fit, enhanced precision, reduced number of visits and chair time, and facilitated seamless rehabilitation of complex maxillofacial defects. Four-dimensional printing involves materials that can change shape or properties over time, enabled printed objects to adapt dynamically to external stimuli, enhancing both comfort and functionality of prosthetics. Further advancements, such as five-dimensional and six-dimensional printing, improved the sensory capabilities of prostheses. Virtual and augmented reality enhance real-world experiences by overlaying digital data, improving accuracy and fit, enabling virtual surgical planning, and developing patient-specific implants. Artificial intelligence (AI) assists automated decision-making and supports the design of AI-driven prostheses. AI algorithms have shown the potential to automate digital planning, replicate intricate anatomical features, and attain high diagnostic accuracy in maxillofacial prosthodontic scenarios.
Keywords
maxillofacial prosthesis - digital technology - artificial intelligence - augmented reality - 3D printing - virtual realityPublication History
Article published online:
27 May 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms 2023: Tenth Edition. J Prosthet Dent 2023; 130 (4, Suppl 1): e7-e126
- 2 de Caxias FP, Dos Santos DM, Bannwart LC, de Moraes Melo Neto CL, Goiato MC. Classification, history, and future prospects of maxillofacial prosthesis. Int J Dent 2019; 2019: 8657619
- 3 Rokohl AC, Pine KR, Pine NS. et al. Prosthetic eye care - the current state of the art. Prog Retin Eye Res 2025; 105: 101337
- 4 Choubisa D. A comprehensive review of extraoral maxillofacial material: part II: early extraoral maxillofacial materials. J Dental Res Rev 2023; 9: 267-275
- 5 Singi SR, Sathe S, Reche AR, Sibal A, Mantri N. Extended arm of precision in prosthodontics: artificial intelligence. Cureus 2022; 14 (11) e30962
- 6 Luo X, Niu J, Su G. et al. Research progress of biomimetic materials in oral medicine. J Biol Eng 2023; 17 (01) 72
- 7 Alsulimani O, Alhaddad A, Altassan M, Bukhari A, Munshi L, Sabir G. The precision of all-on-four implant position recorded from three different CBCT machines. Eur J Dent 2025; 19 (02) 337-345
- 8 Jeong M, Radomski K, Lopez D, Liu JT, Lee JD, Lee SJ. Materials and applications of 3D printing technology in dentistry: an overview. Dent J (Basel) 2023; 12 (01) 1
- 9 Isakov TM, Härkönen H, Atkova I. et al. From challenges to opportunities: digital transformation in hospital-at-home care. Int J Med Inform 2024; 192: 105644
- 10 Scaringi R, Nannelli M, Franchina A. et al. Full zirconia implant-born prosthetic rehabilitation with CAD/CAM technology after accurate digital planning. A case report. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18 (15) 7998
- 11 Wang J, An YX, Shi YL. et al. A digital workflow to predict facial aesthetics in patients with maxillofacial trauma with implant retained prostheses. J Prosthodont Res 2023; 67 (03) 481-486
- 12 Suresh N, Janakiram C, Nayar S, Krishnapriya VN, Mathew A. Effectiveness of digital data acquisition technologies in the fabrication of maxillofacial prostheses - a systematic review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2022; 12 (01) 208-215
- 13 Edher F. Innovations in fixed prosthodontic workflows. J Prosthet Dent 2022; 128 (04) 545-547
- 14 Budati M, Maiti S. Digital Workflow in Maxillofacial Prosthetics. Futuristic Trends in Medical Sciences. Vol. 3. New Delhi, India: Iterative International Publisher; 2023. ,pp. 196-201
- 15 Vosselman N, Glas HH, Merema BJ. et al. Three-dimensional guided zygomatic implant placement after maxillectomy. J Pers Med 2022; 12 (04) 588
- 16 Bhujbal RB, Bakrolwala H, Jurel SK, Chand P, Singh RD. Digitalization in maxillofacial prosthodontics- a review. The Journal of Dental Panacea. 2023; 5 (02) 59-64
- 17 Corsalini M, Barile G, Ranieri F. et al. Comparison between conventional and digital workflow in implant prosthetic rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Funct Biomater 2024; 15 (06) 149-149
- 18 Aponte-Wesson R, Khadivi AA, Cardoso R, Chambers MS. An alternative impression technique for capturing anatomic undercuts to rehabilitate a patient with a total maxillectomy: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 122 (04) 412-416
- 19 Unkovskiy A, Spintzyk S, Kiemle T, Roehler A, Huettig F. Trueness and precision of skin surface reproduction in digital workflows for facial prosthesis fabrication. J Prosthet Dent 2023; 130 (03) 402-413
- 20 Stuani VT, Ferreira R, Manfredi GGP, Cardoso MV, Sant'Ana ACP. Photogrammetry as an alternative for acquiring digital dental models: a proof of concept. Med Hypotheses 2019; 128: 43-49
- 21 Baghani MT, Neshati A, Sadafi M, Shidfar S. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and conventional implant-level impression techniques for maxillofacial prosthesis. J Family Med Prim Care 2023; 12 (03) 446-451
- 22 Hatamleh MM, Hatamlah HM, Nuseir A. Maxillofacial prosthetics and digital technologies: cross-sectional study of healthcare service provision, patient attitudes, and opinions. J Prosthodont 2024; 33 (03) 231-238
- 23 Ahmad S, Hasan N. Fauziya, et al. Review on 3D printing in dentistry: conventional to personalized dental care. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2022; 33 (17) 2292-2323
- 24 Tian Y, Chen C, Xu X. et al. A review of 3D printing in dentistry: technologies, affecting factors, and applications. Scanning 2021; 2021: 9950131
- 25 Zandinejad A, Yilmaz B. 3D printing in clinical dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2024; 37 (07) 3
- 26 Geusens J, Sun Y, Luebbers HT, Bila M, Darche V, Politis C. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-assisted mandibular reconstruction with a fibula free flap. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (08) 2319-2323
- 27 Zeller AN, Neuhaus MT, Weissbach LVM. et al. Patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plates increase accuracy and long-term stability in immediate alloplastic reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2020; 19 (04) 609-615
- 28 Costa-Palau S, Clua-Palau A, Real-Voltas F, Brufau-de Barbera M, Cabratosa-Termes J. A comparison of digital and conventional fabrication techniques for an esthetic maxillofacial prosthesis for the cheek and lip. J Prosthet Dent 2025; 133 (01) 315-320
- 29 Ali IE, Enomoto K, Sumita Y, Wakabayashi N. Combined digital-conventional workflow to fabricate a definitive obturator from an interim obturator for a patient with an anterior maxillectomy defect. J Prosthet Dent 2025; 133 (03) 920-925
- 30 Zoabi A, Redenski I, Oren D. et al. 3D printing and virtual surgical planning in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Clin Med 2022; 11 (09) 2385
- 31 Bansod AV, Pisulkar SG, Dahihandekar C, Beri A. Rapid prototyping in maxillofacial rehabilitation: a review of literature. Cureus 2022; 14 (09) e28969
- 32 Kongsong W, Sittitavornwong S. Utilization of virtual surgical planning for surgical splint-assisted comminuted maxillomandibular fracture reduction and/or fixation. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2020; 13 (04) 334-341
- 33 Wang X, Mu M, Yan J, Han B, Ye R, Guo G. 3D printing materials and 3D printed surgical devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: design, workflow and effectiveness. Regen Biomater 2024; 11: rbae066
- 34 Kouhi M, de Souza Araújo IJ, Asa'ad F. et al. Recent advances in additive manufacturing of patient-specific devices for dental and maxillofacial rehabilitation. Dent Mater 2024; 40 (04) 700-715
- 35 Afzali Naniz M, Askari M, Zolfagharian A, Afzali Naniz M, Bodaghi M. 4D printing: a cutting-edge platform for biomedical applications. Biomed Mater 2022; 17 (06) 062001-062001
- 36 Gharehdaghi N, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Khojasteh A. 4D printing of smart scaffolds for bone regeneration: a systematic review. Biomed Mater 2024; 20 (01) 012003
- 37 Pourmasoumi P, Moghaddam A, Nemati Mahand S. et al. A review on the recent progress, opportunities, and challenges of 4D printing and bioprinting in regenerative medicine. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2023; 34 (01) 108-146
- 38 Lai J, Liu Y, Lu G. et al. 4D bioprinting of programmed dynamic tissues. Bioact Mater 2024; 37: 348-377
- 39 Palanisamy S. Exploring the horizons of four-dimensional printing technology in dentistry. Cureus 2024; 16 (04) e58572
- 40 Perambudhuru Y, Goyal L, Dewan M, Mahajan A, Chaudhari PK. Application of 4D printing in dentistry: a narrative review. J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent 2024; 16 (01) 55-63
- 41 Grillo R, Reis BAQ, Lima BC, Melhem-Elias F. Shaping the 4D frontier in maxillofacial surgery with faceMesh evolution. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2024; 125 (3S): 101843-101843
- 42 Revathi S, Babu M, Rajkumar N, Vinod Kumar VM, Sumanth Ratna K, Sampath B. Unleashing the Future Potential of 4D Printing: Exploring Applications in Wearable Technology, Robotics, Energy, Transportation, and Fashion. In Hassan A, Dutta P, Gupta S, Mattar E, Singh S. eds. Human-Centered Approaches in Industry 5.0: Human-Machine Interaction, Virtual Reality Training, and Customer Sentiment Analysis. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2024: 131-153
- 43 Haleem A, Javaid M, Vaishya R. 5D printing and its expected applications in orthopaedics. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2019; 10 (04) 809-810
- 44 Vasiliadis AV, Koukoulias N, Katakalos K. From three-dimensional (3D)- to 6D-printing technology in orthopedics: science fiction or scientific reality?. J Funct Biomater 2022; 13 (03) 101
- 45 Klimo M, Kvassay M, Kvaššayová N. Digital Twin and Modelling a 3D Human Body in Healthcare. 21st International Conference on Emerging e Learning Technologies and Applications (ICETA). 2023. pp. 307-312
- 46 Martinez-Velazquez R, Gamez R, El Saddik A. Cardio Twin: A Digital Twin of the human heart running on the edge. IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA). Istanbul, Turkey, 2019, pp. 1-6
- 47 Braun M. Represent me: please! Towards an ethics of digital twins in medicine. J Med Ethics 2021 :medethics-2020-106134
- 48 Seth I, Lim B, Lu PYJ. et al. Digital Twins use in plastic surgery: a systematic review. J Clin Med 2024; 13 (24) 7861
- 49 Ayoub A, Pulijala Y. The application of virtual reality and augmented reality in oral & maxillofacial surgery. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19 (01) 238
- 50 Probst FA, Liokatis P, Mast G, Ehrenfeld M. Virtual planning for mandible resection and reconstruction. Innov Surg Sci 2023; 8 (03) 137-148
- 51 Khan HU, Ali Y, Khan F, Al-Antari MA. A comprehensive study on unraveling the advances of immersive technologies (VR/AR/MR/XR) in the healthcare sector during the COVID-19: challenges and solutions. Heliyon 2024; 10 (15) e35037
- 52 Iqbal AI, Aamir A, Hammad A. et al. Immersive technologies in healthcare: an in-depth exploration of virtual reality and augmented reality in enhancing patient care, medical education, and training paradigms. J Prim Care Community Health 2024 15. :21501319241293311
- 53 Shepherd T, Trinder M, Theophilus M. Does virtual reality in the perioperative setting for patient education improve understanding? A scoping review. Surg Pract Sci 2022; 10: 100101
- 54 Elbashti ME, Itamiya T, Aswehlee AM, Sumita YI, Ella B, Naveau A. Augmented reality for interactive visualization of 3D maxillofacial prosthetic data. Int J Prosthodont 2020; 33 (06) 680-683
- 55 Stucki J, Dastgir R, Baur DA, Quereshy FA. The use of virtual reality and augmented reality in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a narrative review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2024; 137 (01) 12-18
- 56 Bartella AK, Kamal M, Scholl I. et al. Virtual reality in preoperative imaging in maxillofacial surgery: implementation of “the next level”?. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 57 (07) 644-648
- 57 De Paolis LT, De Luca V. Augmented visualization with depth perception cues to improve the surgeon's performance in minimally invasive surgery. Med Biol Eng Comput 2019; 57 (05) 995-1013
- 58 Fushima K, Kobayashi M. Mixed-reality simulation for orthognathic surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 38 (01) 13
- 59 Brunzini A, Mandolini M, Caragiuli M, Germani M, Mazzoli A, Pagnoni M. HoloLens 2 for maxillofacial surgery: a preliminary study. In: Rizzi C, Campana F, Bici M, Gherardini F, Ingrassia T, Cicconi P. eds. Design tools and methods in industrial engineering II. Cham: Springer; 2022. pp 123-134
- 60 Vosselman N, Alberga J, Witjes MHJ. et al. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of head and neck cancer patients-challenges and new developments. Oral Dis 2021; 27 (01) 64-72
- 61 Tel A, Arboit L, De Martino M, Isola M, Sembronio S, Robiony M. Systematic review of the software used for virtual surgical planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery over the last decade. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023; 52 (07) 775-786
- 62 Alkaabi S, Maningky M, Helder MN, Alsabri G. Virtual and traditional surgical planning in orthognathic surgery - systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022; 60 (09) 1184-1191
- 63 Goodson AMC, Parmar S, Ganesh S. et al. Printed titanium implants in UK craniomaxillofacial surgery. Part II: perceived performance (outcomes, logistics, and costs). Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 59 (03) 320-328
- 64 Goodson AMC, Parmar S, Ganesh S. et al. Printed titanium implants in UK craniomaxillofacial surgery. Part I: access to digital planning and perceived scope for use in common procedures. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 59 (03) 312-319
- 65 Shilo D, Capucha T, Goldstein D, Bereznyak Y, Emodi O, Rachmiel A. Treatment of facial deformities using 3D planning and printing of patient-specific implants. J Vis Exp 2020; (159) e60930
- 66 Maintz M, Tourbier C, de Wild M. et al. Patient-specific implants made of 3D printed bioresorbable polymers at the point-of-care: material, technology, and scope of surgical application. 3D Print Med 2024; 10 (01) 13
- 67 Sharma N, Ostas D, Rotar H, Brantner P, Thieringer FM. Design and additive manufacturing of a biomimetic customized cranial implant based on Voronoi diagram. Front Physiol 2021; 12: 647923
- 68 Lee UL, Yun S, Lee H. et al. Osseointegration of 3D-printed titanium implants with surface and structure modifications. Dent Mater 2022; 38 (10) 1648-1660
- 69 Sadowsky SJ. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review. Dent Mater 2020; 36 (01) 1-8
- 70 Major R, Kowalczyk P, Surmiak M. et al. Patient specific implants for jawbone reconstruction after tumor resection. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2020; 193: 111056
- 71 Korn P, Gellrich NC, Jehn P, Spalthoff S, Rahlf B. A new strategy for patient-specific implant-borne dental rehabilitation in patients with extended maxillary defects. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 718872
- 72 Zatt FP, Rocha AO, Anjos LMD, Caldas RA, Cardoso M, Rabelo GD. Artificial intelligence applications in dentistry: a bibliometric review with an emphasis on computational research trends within the field. J Am Dent Assoc 2024; 155 (09) 755-764.e5
- 73 Rahim A, Khatoon R, Khan TA. et al. Artificial intelligence-powered dentistry: probing the potential, challenges, and ethicality of artificial intelligence in dentistry. Digit Health 2024 10. :20552076241291345
- 74 Miragall MF, Knoedler S, Kauke-Navarro M. et al. Face the future-artificial intelligence in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Clin Med 2023; 12 (21) 6843
- 75 Wolfaardt JF, Brecht LE, Taft RM. The future of maxillofacial prosthodontics in North America: part II - a survey. J Prosthet Dent 2022; 127 (02) 351-357
- 76 Wolfaardt JF, Brecht LE, Taft RM. The future of maxillofacial prosthodontics in North America: part I-journey to the present. J Prosthet Dent 2022; 127 (02) 345-350
- 77 Modabber A, Rauen A, Ayoub N. et al. Evaluation of a novel algorithm for automating virtual surgical planning in mandibular reconstruction using fibula flaps. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019; 47 (09) 1378-1386
- 78 Pathak A, Dhamande MM, Gujjelwar S, Das P, Chheda EV, Puthenkandathil R. Fabrication of implant-supported auricular prosthesis using artificial intelligence. Cureus 2024; 16 (05) e60267
- 79 Ali IE, Sumita Y, Wakabayashi N. Advancing maxillofacial prosthodontics by using pre-trained convolutional neural networks: image-based classification of the maxilla. J Prosthodont 2024; 33 (07) 645-654
- 80 Ke YF, Zhang YP, Wang Y, Sun YC. Application and outlook of robotics in prosthetic dentistry [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2021; 56 (09) 939-944
- 81 Grischke J, Johannsmeier L, Eich L, Griga L, Haddadin S. Dentronics: towards robotics and artificial intelligence in dentistry. Dent Mater 2020; 36 (06) 765-778
- 82 Liu L, Watanabe M, Ichikawa T. Robotics in dentistry: a narrative review. Dent J 2023; 11 (03) 62
- 83 Jain S, Sayed ME, Ibraheem WI. et al. Accuracy comparison between robot-assisted dental implant placement and static/dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 60 (01) 11
- 84 Yang F, Chen J, Cao R. et al. Comparative analysis of dental implant placement accuracy: Semi-active robotic versus free-hand techniques: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2024; 26 (06) 1149-1161
- 85 Prajapati DP. Maxillofacial Prosthodontics: Present and Future. Futuristic Trends in Medical Sciences. Vol. 3. New Delhi, India: Iterative International Publisher; 2024. .pp. 200-206
- 86 Hung M, Lipsky MS, Phuatrakoon TN, Nguyen M, Licari FW, Unni EJ. Teledentistry implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic: scoping review. Interact J Med Res 2022; 11 (02) e39955
- 87 Mariño R, Ghanim A. Teledentistry: a systematic review of the literature. J Telemed Telecare 2013; 19 (04) 179-183
- 88 Moosa Y, Samaranayake LP, Pisarnturakit PP. Perception and attitudes of dental professionals on teledentistry: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Dent 2025; (epub ahead of print).