RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809048
Calvarial Biopsy Using Augmented Reality Technology: A Case Report and Technical Note
Funding This research received funding through the gracious donation of the Tull Family Foundation.

Abstract
Calvarial lesions are uncommonly encountered and are often a slow and progressive process. Biopsies of calvarial lesions can be uniquely challenging due to its proximity to critical structures. Augmented reality (AR) offers a potential alternative to computed tomography guidance that reduces radiation exposure and provides hands-free intraoperative guidance through complex and challenging surgical approaches. The patient is an 86-year-old female with significant past medical history of coronary heart disease. The patient underwent imaging which demonstrated a left parietal lytic skull lesion with extracranial extension. Using Surgical AR (Medivis, New York, New York, United States), a trajectory was planned centered on the lesion. Surgical AR was registered using point-to-point registration reliant on four anatomic fiducials. We used a ground truth, which is a bi-faced adhesive tag that measures 2 cm × 1 cm, with a QR code on each side that the Surgical AR system recognizes. This ground truth was placed on the patient's forehead, which linked to the registered holographic overlay. A small incision was made and after removal of a small portion of the overlying skull, multiple pieces of the lytic skull lesion were sampled. A specimen was obtained for frozen sectioning. Intra-operative pathology was consistent with metastatic carcinoma. Total surgical time was 35 minutes from incision to closure. The frameless AR navigation system successfully allowed accurate location, visualization, and biopsy of a calvarial lesion that had minimal surface landmarks. More so, this was completed without obscuring the surgical field or requiring time-consuming setup or registration.
Authors' Contributions
N.S., E.G.A., A.N.M., J.B., and C.H. were involved in the design and conception of this manuscript. N.S., S.B., M.K., R.S., A.T., S.A., M.R., N.M.K., L.C., and F.S. performed the literature review and compiled the primary manuscript. N.S., A.T., S.A., N.M.K., L.C., J.R.H., M.R., F.S., and S.P.C. collected and analyzed data. N.S., A.T., S.A., and E.G.A. compiled the figures and video. All authors critically revised the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript as it is written.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. Mai 2025
© 2025. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Shah MV, Haines SJ. Pediatric skull, skull base, and meningeal tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1992; 3 (04) 893-924
- 2 Nasi-Kordhishti I, Hempel JM, Ebner FH, Tatagiba M. Calvarial lesions: overview of imaging features and neurosurgical management. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 44 (06) 3459-3469
- 3 Tomasian A, Hillen TJ, Jennings JW. Percutaneous CT-guided skull biopsy: feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40 (02) 309-312
- 4 Sundararajan SH, Cox M, Sedora-Roman N, Ranganathan S, Hurst R, Pukenas B. Image-guided percutaneous calvarial biopsy with low-dose CT-fluoroscopy: technique, safety, and utility in 12 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45 (01) 134-136
- 5 Sag AA, Zuchowski A, Ronald J, Goodwin CR, Enterline DS. Augmented reality overlay fluoroscopic guidance versus CT-fluoroscopic guidance for sacroplasty. Clin Imaging 2022; 85: 14-21
- 6 Gibby W, Cvetko S, Gibby A. et al. The application of augmented reality-based navigation for accurate target acquisition of deep brain sites: advances in neurosurgical guidance. J Neurosurg 2021; 137 (02) 489-495
- 7 Saylany A, Spadola M, Blue R, Sharma N, Ozturk AK, Yoon JW. The use of a novel heads-up display (HUD) to view intra-operative X-rays during a one-level cervical arthroplasty. World Neurosurg 2020; 138: 369-373
- 8 Yoon JW, Spadola M, Blue R. et al. Do-It-Yourself Augmented Reality Heads-Up Display (DIY AR-HUD): a technical note. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15 (04) 826-833
- 9 Spetzger U, Laborde G, Gilsbach JM. Frameless neuronavigation in modern neurosurgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1995; 38 (04) 163-166
- 10 Skyrman S, Lai M, Edström E. et al. Augmented reality navigation for cranial biopsy and external ventricular drain insertion. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 51 (02) E7
- 11 Yavas G, Caliskan KE, Cagli MS. Three-dimensional-printed marker-based augmented reality neuronavigation: a new neuronavigation technique. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 51 (02) E20
- 12 Hiwatari T, Yamahata H, Yonenaga M. et al. The incidence of depressed skull fractures due to the use of pin-type head frame systems in the adult population: 10-year experience of a single neurosurgical center. World Neurosurg 2021; 155: e395-e401
- 13 Guha D, Alotaibi NM, Nguyen N, Gupta S, McFaul C, Yang VXD. Augmented reality in neurosurgery: a review of current concepts and emerging applications. Can J Neurol Sci 2017; 44 (03) 235-245
- 14 Besharati Tabrizi L, Mahvash M. Augmented reality-guided neurosurgery: accuracy and intraoperative application of an image projection technique. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (01) 206-211
- 15 von Atzigen M, Liebmann F, Hoch A. et al. HoloYolo: a proof-of-concept study for marker-less surgical navigation of spinal rod implants with augmented reality and on-device machine learning. Int J Med Robot 2021; 17 (01) 1-10
- 16 Ikeda N, Katayama Y, Kawabata S. et al. Frameless stereotactic biopsy with intraoperative computed tomography “assessment of efficacy and real target registration error”. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2022; 62 (04) 195-202
- 17 Ivan ME, Eichberg DG, Di L. et al. Augmented reality head-mounted display-based incision planning in cranial neurosurgery: a prospective pilot study. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 51 (02) E3
- 18 Pojskić M, Bopp MHA, Saβ B, Carl B, Nimsky C. Microscope-based augmented reality with intraoperative computed tomography-based navigation for resection of skull base meningiomas in consecutive series of 39 patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14 (09) 2302
- 19 Roethe AL, Rösler J, Misch M, Vajkoczy P, Picht T. Augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022; 164 (01) 3-14
- 20 Lavé A, Meling TR, Schaller K, Corniola MV. Augmented reality in intracranial meningioma surgery: report of a case and systematic review. J Neurosurg Sci 2020; 64 (04) 369-376