PDF icon Download PDF
Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809029
Original Article

Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer: Preoperatively Assessing Aggressiveness of Favorable and Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk Groups by Advanced Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Hua-Bin Huang   *
1   Department of Radiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yet-sen University, Shenzhen, People Republic of China
,
Shu-Yi Li   *
1   Department of Radiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yet-sen University, Shenzhen, People Republic of China
,
Jie Bian
2   Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People Republic of China
,
Zhong-Xing Luo
1   Department of Radiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yet-sen University, Shenzhen, People Republic of China
,
Di-Min Liu
1   Department of Radiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yet-sen University, Shenzhen, People Republic of China
,
Kun-Peng Zhou 
1   Department of Radiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yet-sen University, Shenzhen, People Republic of China
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available ateRefMedOne
  Permissions and Reprints
Preview

Abstract

Background

The treatment decisions and prognostic outcomes have distinct differences between unfavorable intermediate-risk group (un-FIRG) prostate carcinoma (PCa) and favorable intermediate-risk group (FIRG) PCa. The study aimed to differentiate un-FIRG and FIRG by using advanced diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

Methods

From December 2018 to January 2023, 51 FIRG patients and 67 un-FIRG patients were enrolled in our study. All enrolled PCa patients underwent diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and stretched exponential model using a 3.0-T system. The statistical tests included independent samples t-test and binary logistic regression analysis.

Results

Results showed that fractional anisotropy (FA) value and mean kurtosis (MK) value of the un-FIRG (p < 0.001, p < 0.001) were significantly higher than those of the FIRG. On the contrary, mean diffusion (MD), standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion coefficient (D), and distribute diffusion coefficient (DDC) of the un-FIRG (p = 0.013, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001) were significantly lower than those of the FIRG. Results of binary logistic regression analysis showed that the diagnostic model was statistically significant, chi-square = 90.969, p < 0.001, which could effectively distinguish the 86.40% of un-FIRG in the intermediate-risk group. The results of receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve was 0.9429. Sensitivity and specificity were 88.06 and 84.31%.

Conclusion

Compared with the FIRG group PCa, the un-FIRG group PCa exhibits lower standard ADC, D, DDC, and MD values, as well as higher FA and MK values. This suggests that preoperative advanced DWI may serve as an imaging biomarker for distinguishing between the FIRG group and un-FIRG group PCa.

Relevance Statement

Combining preoperative advanced DWI (DKI, IVIM imaging, and the stretched exponential model) shows potential for noninvasive subrisk stratification of intermediate-risk group PCa.

Keywords

prostate cancer - intermediate-risk group - diffusion kurtosis imaging - intravoxel incoherent motion imaging - stretched exponential model

Ethics

Institutional Ethics Committee of The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University approved the study.


* These authors contributed equally to this work.




Publication History

Article published online:
19 May 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India