RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1808101
Curriculum Development and Teaching Strategies in Dental Education
Funding None.
Importance of Curriculum Development and Theoretical Framework
A curriculum is a comprehensive managerial and planning document that encompasses a multitude of vital aspects. It serves as a guiding map not only for learners but also for teachers and institutional stakeholders. A curriculum outlines for learners the contents of the educational program, admission requirements, program duration, available resources, and assessment methods while aiding teachers in content delivery and learner support. For institutional stakeholders, it sets up appropriate assessments and relevant evaluations and reflects an institute's commitment to fulfilling its responsibility toward society by yielding the next generation of health care professionals. A well-designed curriculum integrates educational theories such as constructivism and cognitive load theory, ensuring that teaching strategies align with student-centered learning approaches. These theories emphasize active learning, knowledge construction, and cognitive processing, thereby backing up modern educational methodologies.[1] [2]
Authors' Contributions
Conceptualization and methodology: M.S.Z.
Data curation and formal analysis: W.E.
Investigation and resources: G.G.
Original draft preparation: W.E.
Writing, reviewing, and editing: M.S.Z.
Supervision and project administration: W.E.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. April 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Grant J. Principles of Curriculum Design. In: Swanwick T. ed. 3rd ed.. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2019: 71-88
- 2 Brauer DG, Ferguson KJ. The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96. Med Teach 2015; 37 (04) 312-322
- 3 Young JQ, Van Merrienboer J, Durning S, Ten Cate O. Cognitive load theory: implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86. Med Teach 2014; 36 (05) 371-384
- 4 Harden RM, Sowden S, Dunn WR. Educational strategies in curriculum development: the SPICES model. Med Educ 1984; 18 (04) 284-297
- 5 Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT. et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach 2010; 32 (08) 638-645
- 6 O'Shaughnessy SM, Joyce P. Summative and formative assessment in medicine: the experience of an anaesthesia trainee. Int J High Educ 2015; 4 (02) 198-206
- 7 Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2006
- 8 Perry S, Burrow MF, Leung WK, Bridges SM. Simulation and curriculum design: a global survey in dental education. Aust Dent J 2017; 62 (04) 453-463
- 9 Gratz E, Looney L. Faculty resistance to change: an examination of motivators and barriers to teaching online in higher education. IJOPCD 2020; 10 (01) 1-14
- 10 Sarfaraz S, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS. Use of artificial intelligence in medical education: a strength or an infirmity. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2023; 18 (06) 1553-1554
- 11 Alqutaibi AY, Rahhal MM, Awad R. et al. Foundations of interprofessional education in dental schools: a narrative review. Eur J Dent 2025;
- 12 Alqutaibi AY, Rahhal MM, Awad R. et al. Implementing and evaluating interprofessional education for dental students: a narrative review. Eur J Dent 2025;