Prospective Evaluation of Outcome and Surgical Management of Conus Lipoma in Eastern India

Abstract

Background

Spinal lipomas are a group of spinal dysraphisms that most commonly present as closed spinal disorders associated with tethered cord syndrome. This is a pilot study spanning over 4.5 years, accounting for around 40 cases, aimed to conveniently study the demographic profile of the incidence, age, sex, clinical features, surgical outcome, complications, and follow-up of patients with conus lipomas. Also reviewed were the benefits and risks of prophylactic surgery as well as early versus late surgery.

Methods

It is a prospective cohort study of review of the cases conducted over 4.5 years (between January 2019 and May 2023) at the Department of Neurosurgery, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, with a broad literature review done using search words “Conus” <AND/OR> “Spinal” <AND/OR> “Lipomas” spanning over academic articles indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, NCBI, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. A few home research articles written previously by a senior author of the current article were also cited. Data analysis was done using SPSS 22.0 for Windows for statistical computing.

Results

There was a 1.2:1 male-to-female ratio. The most common age group of the patients ranged between 1 and 5 years. The commonest symptom was swelling in the lower back, and the commonest neurological involvement was motor deficit with bladder dysfunction, subjectively. Most patients remained neurologically intact postoperatively. CSF collection and urinary retention were the most common post-op complications observed.

Conclusion

Symptomatic conus lipoma patients underwent surgery readily, given the deficits. However, looking into all the neurological deficits babies can develop in the long run, our study proposes prophylactic and early surgeries in even asymptomatic babies. However large-scale randomized trials should be undertaken to review the claim and advise accordingly.

Keywords

conus lipoma - spinal dysraphism - neurological deficits - swellings of lower back

Authors' Contribution

A.A. drafted the original manuscript, S.P. reviewed the literature, S.B.S. compiled the results, A.K.M. revised the final draft and conclusion, and R.C.D. prepared the figures and tables, and S.P. and S.T. finalized the manuscript.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. Mai 2025

• References

• 1 Pierre-Kahn A, Zerah M, Renier D. et al. Congenital lumbosacral lipomas. Childs Nerv Syst 1997; 13 (06) 298-334 , discussion 335
• 2 McLone DG, Naidich TP. Terminal myelocystocele. Neurosurgery 1985; 16 (01) 36-43
• 3 Kumar A, Mahapatra AK, Satyarthee GD. Congenital spinal lipomas: role of prophylactic surgery. J Pediatr Neurosci 2012; 7 (02) 85-89
• 4 Blount JP, Elton S. Spinal lipomas. Neurosurg Focus 2001; 10 (01) e3
• 5 Dorward NL, Scatliff JH, Hayward RD. Congenital lumbosacral lipomas: pitfalls in analysing the results of prophylactic surgery. Childs Nerv Syst 2002; 18 (6–7): 326-332
• 6 Kasliwal MK, Mahapatra AK. Surgery for spinal cord lipomas. Indian J Pediatr 2007; 74 (04) 357-362
• 7 Chapman PH. Congenital intraspinal lipomas: anatomic considerations and surgical treatment. Childs Brain 1982; 9 (01) 37-47
• 8 La Marca F, Grant JA, Tomita T, McLone DG. Spinal lipomas in children: outcome of 270 procedures. Pediatr Neurosurg 1997; 26 (01) 8-16
• 9 Xenos C, Sgouros S, Walsh R, Hockley A. Spinal lipomas in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 2000; 32 (06) 295-307
• 10 Pang D. Surgical management of complex spinal cord lipomas : a new perspective. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2020; 63 (03) 279-313
• 11 Pang D. Commentary to the article: asymptomatic lumbosacral lipomas: a natural history study, by Wykes V, Desai D, and Thompson DNP. Childs Nerv Syst 2012; 28 (10) 1741-1742
• 12 Pang D. Surgical management of complex spinal cord lipomas: how, why, and when to operate. In: Di Rocco C, Pang D, Rutka J. eds. Textbook of Pediatric Neurosurgery. Cham: Springer; 2017
• 13 Pang D. Total resection of complex spinal cord lipomas: how, why, and when to operate?. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2015; 55 (09) 695-721
• 14 Kulkarni AV, Pierre-Kahn A, Zerah M. Conservative management of asymptomatic spinal lipomas of the conus. Neurosurgery 2004; 54 (04) 868-873 , discussion 873–875
• 15 Manoranjan B, Pozdnyakov A, Ajani O. Neurosurgical management of conus lipoma in Canada: a multi-center survey. Childs Nerv Syst 2020; 36 (12) 3041-3045
• 16 Hayashi C, Kumano Y, Hirokawa D, Sato H, Yamazaki Y. Long-term urological outcomes of spinal lipoma after prophylactic untethering in infancy: real-world outcomes by lipoma anatomy. Spinal Cord 2020; 58 (04) 490-495