Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1807747
Review Article

Image-Guided Percutaneous Spinal Biopsy: CT or C-Arm Guidance?

Sonal Saran 
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
,
Nishith Kumar
2   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Simran Suri
3   SGT Medical College, Hospital, and Research Institute, Gurugram, Haryana, India
,
Tankeshwar Boruah
4   Central Institute of Orthopaedics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Geetika Khanna
5   Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Sonam Kaur Walia
6   Department of Radiodiagnosis, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Dharmendra Kumar Singh 
2   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Image-guided percutaneous spinal biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure for histopathological confirmation and/or microbiological assessment of spinal lesions. When considering image-guided percutaneous spinal biopsy, both computed tomography (CT) and C-arm guidance have their advantages and specific applications. CT provides high-resolution cross-sectional images, allowing for precise localization of lesions and thus, effective for biopsy of spinal lesions in complex anatomical locations (e.g., cervical and upper dorsal spine). However, patients may receive higher doses of radiation than those with C-arm. C-arm guidance offers continuous imaging, which can enhance needle placement accuracy and is typically associated with lower radiation exposure than CT. However, C-arm provides less detailed images compared with CT, especially for certain lesions, and can be more challenging for accessing certain spinal areas, especially in the presence of anatomical variations. The choice between CT and C-arm guidance often depends on the specific clinical scenario, the location of the lesion, and the preferences of the clinician. For lesions that are easily accessible (lumbar, lower dorsal spine) and require real-time monitoring, C-arm may be preferred. For deeper or more complex lesions, CT guidance often provides better visualization and accuracy. Ultimately, the decision should be tailored to each patient's needs and the expertise of the clinician. This review article aims to compare the use of CT and C-arm guidance in percutaneous spinal biopsy, focusing on their technical aspects, diagnostic accuracy, and safety profiles.

Keywords

CT-guided spinal biopsy - C-arm guided spinal biopsy - vertebral biopsy - transpedicular vertebral biopsy


Publication History

Article published online:
04 June 2025

© 2025. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Harris L, Rajashekar D, Sharma P, David KM. Performance of computed tomography-guided spine biopsy for the diagnosis of malignancy and infection. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 21 (03) 126-130
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Saththianathan M, Mallinson PI, Munk PL, Heran MKS. Percutaneous spine biopsy: reaching those hard-to-reach places. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52 (10) 1803-1814
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Weber MA, Bazzocchi A, Nöbauer-Huhmann IM. Tumors of the spine: when can biopsy be avoided?. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2022; 26 (04) 453-468
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Rajeswaran G, Malik Q, Saifuddin A. Image-guided percutaneous spinal biopsy. Skeletal Radiol 2013; 42 (01) 3-18
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Yang SY, Oh E, Kwon JW, Kim HS. Percutaneous image-guided spinal lesion biopsies: factors affecting higher diagnostic yield. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211 (05) 1068-1074
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Roberts CC, Morrison WB, Leslie KO, Carrino JA, Lozevski JL, Liu PT. Assessment of bone biopsy needles for sample size, specimen quality and ease of use. Skeletal Radiol 2005; 34 (06) 329-335
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Shrestha D, Shrestha R, Dhoju D. Fluoroscopy guided percutaneous transpedicular biopsy for thoracic and lumbar vertebral body lesion: technique and safety in 23 consecutive cases. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2015; 13 (51) 256-260
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Michalopoulos GD, Yolcu YU, Ghaith AK, Alvi MA, Carr CM, Bydon M. Diagnostic yield, accuracy, and complication rate of CT-guided biopsy for spinal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2021; 13 (09) 841-847
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Singh DK, Kumar N, Nayak BK. et al. Approach-based techniques of CT-guided percutaneous vertebral biopsy. Diagn Interv Radiol 2020; 26 (02) 143-146
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Clamp JA, Bayley EJ, Ebrahimi FV, Quraishi NA, Boszczyk BM. Safety of fluoroscopy guided percutaneous access to the thoracic spine. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (suppl 2, suppl 2): S207-S211
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Cox M, Pukenas B, Poplawski M, Bress A, Deely D, Flanders A. CT-guided cervical bone biopsy in 43 patients: diagnostic yield and safety at two large tertiary care hospitals. Acad Radiol 2016; 23 (11) 1372-1375
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Daniels SP, Chazen JL. Lesion characteristics and biopsy techniques influencing diagnostic yield of CT-guided spine biopsy. J Neurointerv Surg 2021; 13 (09) 771-772
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Zakaria Mohamad Z. Rahim A, Kow RY, Karupiah RK, Zainal Abidin NA, Mohamad F. Diagnostic accuracy and adequacy of computed tomography versus C-arm-guided percutaneous transpedicular biopsy of spinal lesions. Cureus 2022; 14 (01) e20889
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Diffre C, Jousset C, Roux AL. et al. Predictive factors for positive disco-vertebral biopsy culture in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis, and impact of fluoroscopic versus scanographic guidance. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20 (01) 512
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Lee SA, Chiu CK, Chan CYW. et al. The clinical utility of fluoroscopic versus CT guided percutaneous transpedicular core needle biopsy for spinal infections and tumours: a randomized trial. Spine J 2020; 20 (07) 1114-1124
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Oka M, Suzuki A, Terai H. et al. Factors predicting the final diagnosis in image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy for suspected spinal tumors. J Clin Med 2023; 12 (13) 4292
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Mireles-Cano JN, Gonzalez AM, García-González OG, Pérez RM. Effectiveness of fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous vertebral biopsy. Rev Bras Ortop 2021; 56 (04) 453-458
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Husseini JS, Habibollahi S, Nelson SB, Rosenthal DI, Chang CY. Best practices: CT-guided percutaneous sampling of vertebral discitis-osteomyelitis and technical factors maximizing biopsy yield. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217 (05) 1057-1068
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Husseini JS, Huang AJ. Discitis-osteomyelitis: optimizing results of percutaneous sampling. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52 (10) 1815-1823
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Czuczman GJ, Marrero DE, Huang AJ, Mandell JC, Ghazikhanian V, Simeone FJ. Diagnostic yield of repeat CT-guided biopsy for suspected infectious spondylodiscitis. Skeletal Radiol 2018; 47 (10) 1403-1410
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Chang CY, Simeone FJ, Nelson SB, Taneja AK, Huang AJ. Is biopsying the paravertebral soft tissue as effective as biopsying the disk or vertebral endplate? 10-year retrospective review of CT-guided biopsy of diskitis-osteomyelitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205 (01) 123-129
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Cannavale A, Nardis P, Lucatelli P. et al. Percutaneous spine biopsy under cone beam computed tomography guidance for spondylodiscitis: time is diagnosis. Neuroradiol J 2021; 34 (06) 607-614
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Wallace AN, Pacheco RA, Vyhmeister R, Tomasian A, Chang RO, Jennings JW. Fluoroscopy-guided intervertebral disc biopsy with a coaxial drill system. Skeletal Radiol 2016; 45 (02) 273-278
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Wallace AN, Pacheco RA, Tomasian A. et al. Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous vertebral body biopsy using a novel drill-powered device: technical case series. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 39 (02) 290-295 Erratum in: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 Mar;39(3):488. doi: 10.1007/s00270-015-1255-4
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Ariyaratne SP, Purohit N, Botchu R. A novel technique for performing aspiration biopsies - a technical report. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2024; 48: 102339
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar