Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel 2025; 20(S 01): S93-S94
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1807545
Abstracts | DDG 2025
Poster
Posterwalk 14: Neue Technologien

Efficacy of the Omnipod®​ 5 Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System Compared with Multiple Daily Injections in Type 1 Diabetes: A Multinational Randomized Controlled Trial (RADIANT)

L Leelarathna
1   Imperial College, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, London, United Kingdom
,
E Wilmot
2   University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, Nottingham, United Kingdom
,
J Beltrand
3   Hôpital Necker enfants malades, APHP Centre, Université de Paris, Pediatric Endocrinology, Gynecology and Diabetology Department, Paris, France
,
B Guerci
4   Brabois Adults Hospital, CHRU of Nancy and Lorraine University, Endocrinology, Diabetology and Nutrition, Nancy, France
,
A Berot
5   American Memorial Hospital, CHU Reims, Department of Pediatrics, Reims, France
,
H Hanaire
6   University Hospital of Toulouse, Department of Diabetology, Toulouse, France
,
E Bismuth
7   Robert Debré Hospital, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Paris, France
,
P Gillard
8   University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Department of Endocrinology, Leuven, Belgium
,
M B Saade
9   Rennes University Hospital, Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Rennes, France
,
M Joubert
10   Caen University Hospital, UNICAEN, Diabetes Care Unit, Caen, France
,
R Salet
11   Nîmes University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Nîmes, France
,
P Choudhary
12   University of Leicester, Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester, United Kingdom
,
R Reynaud
13   Timone Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Multidisciplinary Pediatrics Department, Marseille, France
,
E Renard
14   Children’s Hospital, CHRU of Nancy and Lorraine University, Pediatric Medicine Department, Nancy, France
,
S Lablanche
15   Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble Alpes University, Diabetology Department, Grenoble, France
,
C Gouillard-Darnaud
16   Lenval University Pediatric Hospital, Pediatrics, Nice, France
,
S M Ng
17   Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Edge Hill University, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
,
P Lysy
18   Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Brussels, Belgium
,
N Daskas
19   Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Department of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Oxford, United Kingdom
,
K Perge
20   Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Lyon, France
,
T Crabtree
2   University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, Nottingham, United Kingdom
,
T Ly
21   Insulet Coroporation, Clinical Affairs, Acton, MA, United States
,
M Nicolino
20   Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Lyon, France
› Author Affiliations
 

Background and aims: Despite advances in technology, the prevailing therapy for most people living with type 1 diabetes continues to be multiple daily injections (MDI), with metabolic and clinical outcomes remaining at suboptimal levels. This randomized controlled study aimed to demonstrate superior efficacy of the Omnipod®​ 5 AID System compared with MDI and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use in children and adults with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: Children and adults aged 4-70 years with type 1 diabetes duration≥1 year and screening HbA1c 7.5-11% (58-97 mmol/mol) currently using MDI with a FreeStyle Libre 2 CGM (study CGM) for≥3 months were enrolled across 19 institutions in France, the United Kingdom (UK), and Belgium. Participants completed 14 days of data collection with MDI+CGM and then were randomized 2:1 to intervention (Omnipod 5 System+CGM) or continued with MDI+CGM for 13 weeks (control). The primary endpoint is the change in HbA1c at 13 weeks. Secondary endpoints, tested in a pre-specified hierarchical order include CGM metrics and person-reported outcomes.

Results: A total of 188 participants (58.0% aged<18 years; 45.7% female; 74.5% in France; 19.7% in the UK; 5.9% in Belgium; baseline HbA1c mean±SD 8.1±0.7% [65±7.7 mmol/mol]) were randomized (2:1), 125 to the intervention arm and 63 to the control arm, with the distribution of adult and pediatric participants predefined in the study protocol. The final study visit was completed on August 16, 2024. Full results will be available at the time of the presentation.

Conclusions: This large, multinational randomized controlled trial will provide a direct comparison of outcomes with the Omnipod 5 System compared with MDI+CGM therapy.



Publication History

Article published online:
28 May 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany