Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806960
Original Article

Influence of Various Irrigation Protocols on the Push-Out Bond Strength of TotalFill and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealers to Root Dentin: A Comparative In Vitro Study

1   Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
,
1   Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
,
Hamza El-Farraj
2   Department of Operative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
,
1   Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
,
3   Department of Applied Dental Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
4   Department of Cariology, School of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Amre R. Atmeh
5   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Hamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine (HBMCDM), Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai, United Arab Emirates
,
Jamal Aqrabawi
6   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
,
7   Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Dental and Life Science Institute, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea
,
8   Department of Conservative Dentistry, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
,
7   Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Dental and Life Science Institute, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea
› Author Affiliations

Funding This study was funded by Jordan University of Science and Technology (Grant number: 0071/2023).
Preview

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to compare the push-out bond strength (POBS) of TotalFill (TFB) and AH Plus bioceramic (APB) sealers with different irrigation protocols.

Materials and Methods

Sixty maxillary central incisors were prepared and randomly divided into three groups (n = 10) based on the final irrigation protocol. Group NC: 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); Group NE: 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA; Group NH: 5.25% NaOCl and dual rinse HEDP (1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid). Samples were obturated using either TFB or APB sealer only. In groups NC and NE, NaOCl was used during canal preparation, while in Group NH, NaOCl/HEDP was utilized. The teeth were then horizontally sectioned into three 3-mm thick sections at the apical, middle, and coronal levels. The POBS was performed on the root sections at a 1 mm/min speed. The failure mode was assessed using an optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope.

Statistical analysis

Two-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) was used for statistical analysis to test the interaction between sealer type and irrigation solution, while an independent t-test was conducted to compare the means of the two sealer types at a significance level of 0.05.

Results

Specimens obturated with TFB showed significantly higher POBS than APB (p < 0.001). The highest bond strength was observed in the HEDP/TFB group and the lowest in the HEDP/APB group. Irrigation did not significantly influence the POBS (p > 0.05). Mixed failure was most commonly observed in all groups (>65%).

Conclusion

TFB sealer had improved bond strength over APB sealer, regardless of the final irrigation protocol used, which did not significantly affect the bond strength.

Note

This article was a part of a master thesis project and funded by Jordan University of Science and Technology (Grant number: 0071/2023).


Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.




Publication History

Article published online:
23 April 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India