CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · South Asian J Cancer
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806957
Original Article

Real-World Data on the Practice of Chemoradiation with Select Cohort Consolidation Chemotherapy in High-Risk Locally Advanced Rectal Cancers (SOLAR study)

Mounika Yallala
1   Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
2   Department of Radiational Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Anjali Shah
1   Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
1   Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Anant Ramaswamy
1   Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Akshay Baheti
3   Department of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Avanish Saklani
4   Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
2   Department of Radiational Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Suman K. Ankathi
3   Department of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Mufaddal Kazi
4   Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Ashwin Desouza
4   Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
1   Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives

Chemoradiation with capecitabine radiotherapy (Cape–RT) has been the standard of care as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) for more than a decade. However, total neoadjuvant therapy has recently emerged as an alternative with the potential to impact survival outcomes; baseline outcomes with Cape–RT in real-world practice in the Indian context are not well known.

Material and Methods

Treatment-naive patients with adenocarcinoma on histology and clinical-radiologically diagnosed LARC who received Cape–RT from June 2014 to December 2021 after multidisciplinary discussion were included. Patients received a long course of conventionally fractionated external beam RT (45–50 Gy in 25#) with concurrent oral capecitabine at a dose of 1650 mg/m2/day. Post approximately 6 to 8 weeks of completion of Cape–RT, patients were evaluated clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging pelvis for total mesorectal excision (TME) in the multidisciplinary team meetings. The primary endpoint of the study was event-free survival (EFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and pathological complete response (PCR) rates. EFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

A total of 1,189 patients with a median age of 49 years (range: 15–95) were identified and included. A significant proportion of patients had high-risk characteristics, such as T3/T4 disease (94%) and node positivity (90%), and they involved circumferential resection margin (CRM) (51%) at baseline. Signet ring and mucinous histology were seen in 13 and 11% of patients. Two hundred and seventy-six patients (23%) required further consolidation chemotherapy (commonly CAPOX [capecitabine-oxaliplatin] or modified FOLFIRINOX [5-fluorouracil-leucovorin-irinotecan-oxaliplatin]) post-Cape–RT prior to attempting surgery due to either persistent CRM positivity, clinical T4 disease, prostate abutment, sphincter involvement (248 patients, 21%), or extensive bulky disease with poor response (12 patients, 1%). Overall, 14 patients (6%) had an interruption in RT and 22 (8%) in chemotherapy. Post-Cape–RT, with or without chemotherapy, 945 patients (79%) underwent TME. Chemotherapy post-TME was administered in 808 patients (78%). With a median follow-up of 54 months (range: 51.2–57.2), the 3- and 5-year EFS for the entire cohort was 73.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70.6–75.8) and 64.3% (95% CI: 61.1–67.5), respectively, while the estimated 3- and 5-year OS was 81.3% (95% CI: 78.9–83.7) and 73% (95% CI: 70–76), respectively. On multivariate analysis, the presence of higher T stage (p < 0.001) and signet ring histology (p = 0.004) predicted inferior OS.

Conclusion

Real-world data in a less-resourced setting concurs with published prospective and Western real-world data. This provides confidence in implementing consolidation chemotherapy in total neoadjuvant settings in countries with fewer resources.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Ethics Committee (EC) (IEC/1116/1799/001) at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.


Financial Support and Sponsorship

None.




Publication History

Received: 05 October 2024

Accepted: 06 March 2025

Article published online:
03 April 2025

© 2025. MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Cercek A, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73 (03) 233-254
  • 2 Global Cancer Observatory. International Agency for Research on Cancer. World Health Organization. Accessed December 13, 2023 at: https://gco.iarc.fr/
  • 3 McCarthy K, Pearson K, Fulton R, Hewitt J. Pre-operative chemoradiation for non-metastatic locally advanced rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12: CD008368
  • 4 Petersen SH, Harling H, Kirkeby LT, Wille-Jørgensen P, Mocellin S. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer operated for cure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 2012 (03) CD004078
  • 5 Mari GM, Maggioni D, Crippa J. et al; AIMS Academy Clinical Research Network. Compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy of patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer: report from a multi-institutional research network. World J Surg 2019; 43 (10) 2544-2551
  • 6 Conroy T, Bosset JF, Etienne PL. et al; Unicancer Gastrointestinal Group and Partenariat de Recherche en Oncologie Digestive (PRODIGE) Group. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (UNICANCER-PRODIGE 23): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22 (05) 702-715
  • 7 van der Valk MJM, Marijnen CAM, van Etten B. et al; Collaborative investigators. Compliance and tolerability of short-course radiotherapy followed by preoperative chemotherapy and surgery for high-risk rectal cancer - results of the international randomized RAPIDO-trial. Radiother Oncol 2020; 147: 75-83
  • 8 Ostwal V, Pande NS, Engineer R. et al. Low prevalence of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) protein in locally advanced rectal cancers (LARC) and treatment outcomes. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10 (01) 19-29
  • 9 Koca D, Binicier C, Oztop I, Yavuzsen T, Ellidokuz H, Yilmaz U. Prognostic factors affecting recurrence and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. J Balkan Union Oncol 2012; 17 (02) 291-298
  • 10 Schwartz LH, Litière S, de Vries E. et al. RECIST 1.1-update and clarification: from the RECIST committee. Eur J Cancer 2016; 62: 132-137
  • 11 Prajapati R, Ostwal V, Srinivas S. et al. Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) as neoadjuvant therapy and ‘salvage’ in patients with high risk locally advanced rectal cancers - tolerance and early outcomes. J Cancer Res Ther 2024; 20 (01) 199-203
  • 12 Kumar NA, Desouza A, Ostwal V. et al. Outcomes of exenteration in cT4 and fixed cT3 stage primary rectal adenocarcinoma: a subgroup analysis of consolidation chemotherapy following neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406 (03) 821-831
  • 13 Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Prolongation of the disease-free interval in surgically treated rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1985; 312 (23) 1465-1472
  • 14 Krook JE, Moertel CG, Gunderson LL. et al. Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991; 324 (11) 709-715
  • 15 Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S. et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30 (16) 1926-1933
  • 16 Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O'Connell MJ. et al. Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (31) 5124-5130
  • 17 Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A. et al. Sphincter preservation following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short-term radiotherapy vs. conventionally fractionated radiochemotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2004; 72 (01) 15-24
  • 18 Ciseł B, Pietrzak L, Michalski W. et al; Polish Colorectal Study Group. Long-course preoperative chemoradiation versus 5 × 5 Gy and consolidation chemotherapy for clinical T4 and fixed clinical T3 rectal cancer: long-term results of the randomized Polish II study. Ann Oncol 2019; 30 (08) 1298-1303
  • 19 Ngan SY, Burmeister B, Fisher RJ. et al. Randomized trial of short-course radiotherapy versus long-course chemoradiation comparing rates of local recurrence in patients with T3 rectal cancer: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial 01.04. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30 (31) 3827-3833
  • 20 Kim JS, Kim JS, Cho MJ, Yoon WH, Song KS. Comparison of the efficacy of oral capecitabine versus bolus 5-FU in preoperative radiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer. J Korean Med Sci 2006; 21 (01) 52-57
  • 21 Zhu J, Zeng W, Ge L, Yang X, Wang Q, Wang H. Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (17) e15241
  • 22 Hofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S. et al. Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13 (06) 579-588
  • 23 Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B. et al; RAPIDO collaborative investigators. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22 (01) 29-42
  • 24 Audisio A, Velenik V, Meillat H. et al. International real-world study of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (Larc). J Clin Oncol 2024; 42 (3, suppl): 40