Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806947
Original Article

Evaluation of Quality and Availability of Arabic Web-Based Information on Dry Socket

1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnostic Sciences, Taibah University Dental College, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwrah, Saudi Arabia
,
Samer Shahadah
2   Taibah University Dental College, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwrah, Saudi Arabia
,
2   Taibah University Dental College, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwrah, Saudi Arabia
,
Abdulrahman Alturkistani
2   Taibah University Dental College, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwrah, Saudi Arabia
,
3   Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Taibah University Dental College & Hospital, Prince, Naif Ibn Abdulaziz, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwrah, Saudi Arabia
,
Muath Alassaf
4   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King Fahad hospital, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwrah, Saudi Arabia
,
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnostic Sciences, Taibah University Dental College, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwrah, Saudi Arabia
› Author Affiliations

Funding None.
Preview

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the quality and availability of Arabic-language internet-based information on alveolar osteitis or dry socket.

Materials and Methods

The present cross-sectional study included the first 50 websites that appeared through Bing, Google, and Yahoo search engines for the terms alveolar osteitis or dry socket or alveolitis to evaluate the content, quality, and readability of the available Arabic information. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria for website analysis, the Health on the Net (HON), and the DISCERN instrument were used to evaluate the quality of the online material. Three metrics were used to evaluate the readability: Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and the Flesch Reading Ease (FRES) scores.

Results

Based on affiliation, dental/medical centers have the highest representation, followed by nonprofit organizations. Visuals like images are moderately used. The reliability DISCREN domain scores indicated generally poor balance in the materials, though relevance is a notable strength. Overall rating (Q16) revealed that the materials are rated as moderately useful overall with relatively low variability (mean: 2.93; standard deviation [SD]: 0.776). Governmental/university websites excel in meeting the JAMA benchmarks. Dental/medical centers and nonprofit organizations showed better overall JAMA performance than commercial websites. According to the FRES scale, the majority of websites are written in a simple, accessible manner, suitable for general users. Most websites offer moderate-quality information (mean = 38.19; SD = 9.035 [range: 22–56]).

Conclusion

Most websites had medium-quality data on dry socket without achieving high reliability or usability or treatment risk by the majority of websites with nonprofits websites leading in this regard, followed by dental/medical centers.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval is not required for this study.


Recommendations

Therapeutic information and treatment advices should not be oversimplified. Therefore, websites should concentrate on content that clearly cites sources and provides in-depth details on risks and patient-centered decision-making allowing them to make more educated decisions. Public education efforts in the Arab world can assist people better interpret internet health information.




Publication History

Article published online:
22 April 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India