PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806933
Original Article

The Effect of Cement Thickness on Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia with Three Different Self-Adhesive Resin Cements

Thofun Ieamsuwantada 
1   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Suparaksa Yamockul
1   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Niyom Thamrongananskul
1   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Atikom Surintanasarn
1   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Awiruth Klaisiri 
2   Division of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
› Institutsangaben Funding This study was supported by the Dental Research Fund, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of resin cement thickness on the shear bond strength (SBS) of zirconia bonded with three different self-adhesive resin cements (SACs).

Materials and Methods

One hundred and twenty zirconia specimens were prepared. Zirconia disks were milled into a cuboidal shape of size 8 × 8 × 6 mm3 using a milling machine, sintered according to the manufacturer's instruction, polished with sandpaper, airborne particle abraded with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles, and randomly divided into 12 groups (n = 10), according to the cement thickness (50, 100, 150, and 200 μm) and SAC (RelyX U200, PANAVIA SA LUTING Multi, and Maxcem Elite Chroma). The specimens were cemented to the resin composite blocks with SAC, stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours, and subjected to the SBS test. Mode of failure was evaluated under a stereo microscope. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test to compare the differences in mean SBSs between groups at 95% confidence level.

Results

Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in SBS (p < 0.05) across the SACs, with the highest mean observed in the 50 μm cement thickness group and decreased as cement thickness increased. PANAVIA SA LUTING Multi exhibited the highest SBS, followed by the RelyX U200 groups, with the lowest SBS observed in Maxcem Elite Chroma groups (p < 0.05). In addition, the predominant mode of failure in all groups, except RelyX U200 and Maxcem Elite Chroma groups with the thickness of 200 μm, was score 4 (no resin cement remained on the zirconia surface).

Conclusion

The difference in cement thickness and the type of SAC affected the SBS to zirconia. The lesser the cement thickness, the higher the SBS. 10-MDP-based cements, which provide the highest bond strength to zirconia and low cement thickness, are suggested for zirconia cementation to achieve a strong bond between zirconia and resin cement.

Keywords

zirconia - self-adhesive resin cement - cement thickness


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. Mai 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Anusavice K, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. editor: Kenneh J Anusavice, Chapter 18, 12th ed.. St. Louis, MO: Saunders; 2012: 129
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J 2011; 56 (Suppl. 01) 84-96
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Lohbauer U, Zipperle M, Rischka K, Petschelt A, Müller FA. Hydroxylation of dental zirconia surfaces: characterization and bonding potential. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 87 (02) 461-467
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015; 31 (06) 603-623
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Özcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17 (01) 7-26
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now?. Dent Mater 2011; 27 (01) 71-82
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Shimoe S, Hirata I, Otaku M, Matsumura H, Kato K, Satoda T. Formation of chemical bonds on zirconia surfaces with acidic functional monomers. J Oral Sci 2018; 60 (02) 187-193
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Fathpour K, Nili Ahmadabadi M, Atash R, Fathi AH. Effect of different surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of resin composite/zirconia for intra-oral repair of zirconia restorations. Eur J Dent 2023; 17 (03) 809-817
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Opatragoon S, Klaisiri A, Sriamporn T, Thamrongananskul N. Comparison of the shear bond strength using primers with different application numbers on dental zirconia. Eur J Dent 2024; 18 (04) 1004-1011
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Klaisiri A, Krajangta N, Thamrongananskul N. The durability of zirconia/resin composite shear bond strength using different functional monomer of universal adhesives. Eur J Dent 2022; 16 (04) 756-760
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Manamee T, Khuankaew C, Thamaneewan I. et al. Surface treatment for zirconia bonding with resin cement. CM Dent J 2017; 38: 29-41
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Heboyan AG, Vardanyan AR, Avetisyan AA. Cement selection in dental practice. World Science 2019; 2 (43) 4-9
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Meerbeek BV, Vargas M, Inoue S. et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001; 6: 119-144
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Liu JF, Yang CC, Luo JL, Liu YC, Yan M, Ding SJ. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to a high transparency zirconia crown and dentin. J Dent Sci 2022; 17 (02) 973-983
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 May LG, Kelly JR, Bottino MA, Hill T. Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing. Dent Mater 2012; 28 (08) e99-e109
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Olivera AB, Saito T. The effect of die spacer on retention and fitting of complete cast crowns. J Prosthodont 2006; 15 (04) 243-249
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Beuer F, Naumann M, Gernet W, Sorensen JA. Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig 2009; 13 (03) 343-349
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1996; 12 (04) 245-249
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Taha FA, Ibraheem AF. The effect of die spacer thickness on retentive strength of all zirconium crowns (an in vitro study). Int J Med Res Health Sci 2019; 8: 22-27
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Maneenacarith A, Rakmanee T, Klaisir A. The influence of resin cement thicknesses on shear bond strength of the cement zirconia. Journal of Stomatology 2022; 75 (01) 7-12
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984; 85 (04) 333-340
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Gultekin P, Gultekin BA, Aydin M, Yalcin S. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings. J Prosthodont 2013; 22 (02) 112-119
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Nagaoka N, Yoshihara K, Feitosa VP. et al. Chemical interaction mechanism of 10-MDP with zirconia. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 45563
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Kim JH, Chae SY, Lee Y, Han GJ, Cho BH. Effects of multipurpose, universal adhesives on resin bonding to zirconia ceramic. Oper Dent 2015; 40 (01) 55-62
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Fuentes MV, Escribano N, Baracco B, Romero M, Ceballos L. Effect of indirect composite treatment microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements. J Clin Exp Dent 2016; 8 (01) e14-e21
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Sriamporn T, Thamrongananskul N, Klaisiri A. The effectiveness of various functional monomers in self-adhesive resin cements on prosthetic materials. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2022; 12 (03) 332-335
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Uludamar A, Aykent F. Bond strength of resin cements to zirconia ceramics with different surface treatments. Balk J Stom 2012; 16: 173-178
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Urapepon S, Luesak W, Suchatlampong C. Effect of cement film thickness on shear bond strengths of two resin cements. M Dent J 2014; 34: 122-128
    Suche in Google Scholar