PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806932
Review Article

Effects of Micro-Osteoperforation Depths on Canine Retraction Rate and Root Resorption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Potjanakorn Inpanya 
1   Orthodontic Section, Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
,
Pannapat Chanmanee
1   Orthodontic Section, Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
,
Supontep Teerakanok 
2   Periodontic Section, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
› Institutsangaben Funding We would like to thank the Faculty of Dentistry and Prince of Songkla University for grant support.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare canine retraction rates and the amounts of root resorption in different depths of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) during canine retraction in orthodontic patients. Relevant literature was sought using a prespecified search strategy until May 2024. Electronic medical and scientific databases included PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane's Library (clinical trials). The review protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42024555722). The data were analyzed in terms of mean difference for comparison using a random-effect meta-analysis. A total of 14 randomized controlled trial studies were included. According to the findings of the meta-analysis on MOPs and their impact on the mean rate of canine movement, the MOP groups showed a significantly higher rate compared with the control groups (weighted mean difference = 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24–0.40; p = 0.00 and weighted mean difference = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.01–0.40; p = 0.04) at depths of 2 to 4 and 5 to 7 mm, respectively. Three studies reported no differences in root resorption between the MOP groups and the control groups. Both MOP depths, that is, 2 to 4 and 5 to 7 mm, accelerated canine retraction more than the controls by approximately 0.32 and 0.20 mm/month, respectively. However, both MOP depths presented root resorption during canine retraction that was not different from the controls.

Keywords

orthodontics - micro-osteoperforation - tooth movement - meta-analysis - systematic review

Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
02. Mai 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Kole H. Surgical operations on the alveolar ridge to correct occlusal abnormalities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1959; 12 (05) 515-529
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Frost HM. The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review. Henry Ford Hosp Med J 1983; 31 (01) 3-9
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Wilcko WM, Wilcko T, Bouquot JE, Ferguson DJ. Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: two case reports of decrowding. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001; 21 (01) 9-19
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Gasparro R, Bucci R, De Rosa F. et al. Effectiveness of surgical procedures in the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement: findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2022; 58: 137-154
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Dibart S, Sebaoun JD, Surmenian J. Piezocision: a minimally invasive, periodontally accelerated orthodontic tooth movement procedure. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2009; 30 (06) 342-344 , 346, 348–350
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Leethanakul C, Kanokkulchai S, Pongpanich S, Leepong N, Charoemratrote C. Interseptal bone reduction on the rate of maxillary canine retraction. Angle Orthod 2014; 84 (05) 839-845
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Park YG. Corticision: a flapless procedure to accelerate tooth movement. Front Oral Biol 2016; 18: 109-117
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Teixeira CC, Khoo E, Tran J. et al. Cytokine expression and accelerated tooth movement. J Dent Res 2010; 89 (10) 1135-1141
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Al-Khalifa KS, Baeshen HA. Micro-osteoperforations and its effect on the rate of tooth movement: a systematic review. Eur J Dent 2021; 15 (01) 158-167
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B. et al. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144 (05) 639-648
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Alikhani M, Alansari S, Sangsuwon C. et al. Micro-osteoperforations: minimally invasive accelerated tooth movement. Semin Orthod 2015; 21 (03) 162-169
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Dos Santos CCO, Mecenas P, de Castro Aragón MLS, Normando D. Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod 2020; 21 (01) 27
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Idrees W, Kanwal L, Maaz M, Fida M, Sukhia RH. Comparison of canine retraction rate between miniscrew assisted micro-osteoperforation and conventional technique–a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Investig Orthod 2023; 83 (1) 1-6
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Mohaghegh S, Soleimani M, Kouhestani F, Motamedian SR. The effect of single/multiple micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and its possible complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthod 2021; 19 (02) 183-196
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Shahabee M, Shafaee H, Abtahi M, Rangrazi A, Bardideh E. Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement-a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2020; 42 (02) 211-221
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Sivarajan S, Ringgingon LP, Fayed MMS, Wey MC. The effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020; 157 (03) 290-304
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372 (71) n71
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials 2007; 28 (02) 105-114
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Guyatt GH, Thorlund K, Oxman AD. et al. GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66 (02) 173-183
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Abdelhameed AN, Refai WMM. Evaluation of the effect of combined low energy laser application and micro-osteoperforations versus the effect of application of each technique separately on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018; 6 (11) 2180-2185
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Alkebsi A, Al-Maaitah E, Al-Shorman H, Abu Alhaija E. Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 153 (06) 771-785
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Alqadasi B, Aldhorae K, Halboub E. et al. The effectiveness of micro-osteoperforations during canine retraction: a three-dimensional randomized clinical trial. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2019; 9 (06) 637-645
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Alqadasi B, Xia HY, Alhammadi MS, Hasan H, Aldhorae K, Halboub E. Three-dimensional assessment of accelerating orthodontic tooth movement-micro-osteoperforations vs piezocision: a randomized, parallel-group and split-mouth controlled clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 2021; 24 (03) 335-343
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Babanouri N, Ajami S, Salehi P. Effect of mini-screw-facilitated micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a single-center, split-mouth, randomized, controlled trial. Prog Orthod 2020; 21 (01) 7
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Golshah A, Moradi P, Nikkerdar N. Efficacy of micro-osteoperforation of the alveolar bone by using mini-screw for acceleration of maxillary canine retraction in young adult orthodontic patients: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Int Orthod 2021; 19 (04) 601-611
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Haliloglu-Ozkan T, Arici N, Arici S. In-vivo effects of flapless osteopuncture-facilitated tooth movement in the maxilla and the mandible. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10 (08) e761-e767
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Li J, Papadopoulou AK, Gandedkar N, Dalci K, Darendeliler MA, Dalci O. The effect of micro-osteoperforations on orthodontic space closure investigated over 12 weeks: a split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2022; 44 (04) 427-435
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Ozkan TH, Arici S. The effect of different micro-osteoperforation depths on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a single-center, single-blind, randomized clinical trial. Korean J Orthod 2021; 51 (03) 157-165
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Raghav P, Khera AK, Preeti P, Jain S, Mohan S, Tiwari A. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and expression of biomarkers: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Dental Press J Orthod 2022; 27 (01) e2219403
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Sivarajan S, Doss JG, Papageorgiou SN, Cobourne MT, Wey MC. Mini-implant supported canine retraction with micro-osteoperforation: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2019; 89 (02) 183-189
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Thomas S, Das SK, Barik AK, Raj SC, Rajasekaran A, Mishra M. Evaluation of physiodispenser assisted micro-osteoperforation on the rate of tooth movement and associated periodontal tissue status during individual canine retraction in first premolar extraction cases: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. J World Fed Orthod 2021; 10 (03) 89-97
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Venkatachalapathy S, Natarajan R, Ramachandran UM. et al. Effect of frequency of micro-osteoperforation on miniscrew- supported canine retraction: a single-centered, split-mouth randomized controlled trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022; 23 (08) 781-787
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Kawasaki K, Takahashi T, Yamaguchi M, Kasai K. Effects of aging on RANKL and OPG levels in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod Craniofac Res 2006; 9 (03) 137-142
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Mheissen S, Khan H, Alsafadi AS, Almuzian M. The effectiveness of surgical adjunctive procedures in the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. J Orthod 2021; 48 (02) 156-171
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 MacDonald L, Zanjir M, Laghapour Lighvan N, da Costa BR, Suri S, Azarpazhooh A. Efficacy and safety of different interventions to accelerate maxillary canine retraction following premolar extraction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res 2021; 24 (01) 17-38
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Alikhani M, Alansari S, Sangsuwon C, Teo MC, Hiranpradit P, Teixeira CC. Anabolic effects of MOPs: cortical drifting. In: Alikhani M. , eds Clinical Guide to Accelerated Orthodontics. Cham: Springer; 2017: 79-98
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Alikhani M, Sangsuwon C, Alansari S, Jeerah M, Teixeira C. Catabolic Effects of MOPs at Different Treatment Stages. Springer Link; 2017: 43-77
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Alikhani M, Sangsuwon C, Alansari S, Nervina JM, Teixeira CC. Biphasic theory: breakthrough understanding of tooth movement. J World Fed Orthod 2018; 7 (03) 82-88
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Shoreibah EA, Salama AE, Attia MS, Abu-Seida SM. Corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics in adults using a further modified technique. J Int Acad Periodontol 2012; 14 (04) 97-104
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Wilcko WM, Ferguson D, Bouquot J, Wilcko T. Rapid orthodontic decrowding with alveolar augmentation: case report. World J Orthod 2003; 4 (03) 197-205
    Suche in Google Scholar