Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806851
Postprocessing Deep Neural Network for Performance Improvement of Interictal Epileptiform Discharge Detection
Funding None.

Abstract
Objective
Automated detection of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) on electroencephalographic (EEG) data aims to reduce the time and resources spent on visual analysis by experts (the gold standard) with algorithms that match or outperform experts. In this study, we aimed to further improve IED detection performance of a deep neural network based algorithm with a simpler second-level postprocessing deep learning network, a new approach in this field.
Materials and Methods
Seventeen interictal ambulatory EEGs were used, 15 with focal and 2 with generalized epilepsy in patients of aged 4 to 80 years (median: 19 years; 25th–75th percentile: 14–32 years). Two-second nonoverlapping epochs with a 0.99 or higher IED probability were selected by a previously developed VGG-C convolutional neural network (CNN) as input for the second-level postprocessing CNN we developed. Our CNN was tested on the resulting 580 EEG epochs after 80/20 training/validation with 3,049 epochs.
Results
Model accuracy was 86% for the validation set and 60% for the test set. The first-level CNN selected 37% true IEDs, and with the addition of our second-level postprocessing CNN, this increased to 38%. Doubling input data of the second-level CNN, and making its architecture more complex, as well as less complex, did not improve performance.
Conclusion
We were unable to reproduce the previously reported performance of the first-level CNN, and adding the postprocessing CNN did not improve IED detection.
Publication History
Article published online:
09 April 2025
© 2025. Indian Epilepsy Society. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Smith SJM, Smith S. EEG in the diagnosis, classification, and management of patients with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76 (Suppl. 02) ii2-ii7
- 2 Pillai J, Sperling MR. Interictal EEG and the diagnosis of epilepsy. Epilepsia 2006; 47 (Suppl. 01) 14-22
- 3 Lodder SS, Askamp J, van Putten MJAM. Computer-assisted interpretation of the EEG background pattern: a clinical evaluation. PLoS One 2014; 9 (01) e85966
- 4 Lodder SS, van Putten MJAM. A self-adapting system for the automated detection of inter-ictal epileptiform discharges. PLoS One 2014; 9 (01) e85180
- 5 da Silva Lourenço C, Tjepkema-Cloostermans MC, van Putten MJAM. Machine learning for detection of interictal epileptiform discharges. Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 132 (07) 1433-1443
- 6 Wilson SB, Emerson R. Spike detection: a review and comparison of algorithms. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113 (12) 1873-1881
- 7 Tjepkema-Cloostermans MC, de Carvalho RCV, van Putten MJAM. Deep learning for detection of focal epileptiform discharges from scalp EEG recordings. Clin Neurophysiol 2018; 129 (10) 2191-2196
- 8 da Silva Lourenço C, Tjepkema-Cloostermans MC, van Putten MJAM. Efficient use of clinical EEG data for deep learning in epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 132 (06) 1234-1240
- 9 Rosenberg Johansen A, Jin J, Maszczyk T, Dauwels J, Cash SS, Brandon Westover M. Epileptiform spike detection via convolutional neural networks. Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process 2016; 754-758
- 10 Jing J, Sun H, Kim JA. et al. Development of expert-level automated detection of epileptiform discharges during electroencephalogram interpretation. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77 (01) 103-108
- 11 Haider A, Wei Y, Liu S, Hwang SH. Pre- and post-processing algorithms with deep learning classifier for Wi-Fi fingerprint-based indoor positioning. Electronics (Switzerland) 2019; 8 (02) 195
- 12 Marechal E, Jaugey A, Tarris G. et al. Automatic evaluation of histological prognostic factors using two consecutive convolutional neural networks on kidney samples. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17 (02) 260-270
- 13 Cho J, Lee K, Shin E, Choy G, Do S. How much data is needed to train a medical image deep learning system to achieve necessary high accuracy?. Published online November 19, 2015. doi:doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1511.06348
- 14 Aggarwal CC. Neural Networks and Deep Learning: A Textbook. Cham: Springer; 2023
- 15 Jing J, Herlopian A, Karakis I. et al. Interrater reliability of experts in identifying interictal epileptiform discharges in electroencephalograms. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77 (01) 49-57
- 16 Lilhore UK, Dalal S, Simaiya S. A cognitive security framework for detecting intrusions in IoT and 5G utilizing deep learning. Comput Secur 2024; 136: 103560
- 17 Dalal S, Kumar Lilhore U, Faujdar N. et al. Next-generation cyber attack prediction for IoT systems: leveraging multi-class SVM and optimized CHAID decision tree. J Cloud Comput (Heidelb) 2023; 12: 137