CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806850
Original Article

Comparison of Dual-Energy CT Derived Myocardial Delayed Enhancement with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiomyopathy-Related Heart Failure

1   Department of Radiology and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Uma Debi
1   Department of Radiology and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
1   Department of Radiology and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
1   Department of Radiology and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Saurabh Mehrotra
2   Cardiology Department, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
› Institutsangaben

Funding None.

Abstract

Background

Cardiomyopathy (CMP) related heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of disability and death. Using novel cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is detected as an imaging marker of myocardial fibrosis. Over the last few years there is increased percentage of ischemia related heart failure, subjecting patients to invasive catheter angiography for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study evaluates the role of Dual energy cardiac computed tomography (DECT) as a one-step modality to diagnose coronary artery disease and myocardial fibrosis in a single step investigation.

Purpose

The aim of the study is to assess the diagnostic performance of DECT in the evaluation of myocardial delayed enhancement (MDE) with LGE MRI as the standard of reference.

Materials and Methods

Thirty patients of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (<40%) who were diagnosed with myocardial scar (LGE) on CMRI underwent DECT coronary angiography and delayed scan at 8 to 10 minutes for assessment of MDE, mainly assessing the coronary vascular status and the pattern of MDE detection. The MDE images (virtual monochromatic [VM] and iodine density maps) were compared with the LGE images, with LGE as the gold standard.

Results

The diagnostic accuracy of iodine density map and VM images as compared with LGE in CMRI is 76 and 66%, respectively (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of virtual monochromatic images as compared with iodine density maps is 86.96 and 100%, respectively, with a kappa value of 0.757 consistent with the statistically significant result.

Conclusion

DECT angiography with MDE is a robust investigation to detect coronary artery disease and myocardial fibrosis in the same sitting with comparable performance when compared with CMRI-derived LGE imaging.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. April 2025

© 2025. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Huffman MD, Prabhakaran D. Heart failure: epidemiology and prevention in India. Natl Med J India 2010; 23 (05) 283-288
  • 2 Chaturvedi V, Parakh N, Seth S. et al. Heart failure in India: the INDUS Study (INDia Ukieri Study). J Pract Cardiovasc Sci 2016; 2: 28-35
  • 3 Maron BJ, Towbin JA, Thiene G. et al; American Heart Association, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee, Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 2006; 113 (14) 1807-1816
  • 4 Felker GM, Thompson RE, Hare JM. et al. Underlying causes and long-term survival in patients with initially unexplained cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2000; 342 (15) 1077-1084
  • 5 Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM, Sechtem U, Kim RJ. Delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J 2005; 26 (15) 1461-1474
  • 6 Lee HJ, Im DJ, Youn JC. et al. Assessment of myocardial delayed enhancement with cardiac computed tomography in cardiomyopathies: a prospective comparison with delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 33 (04) 577-584
  • 7 Metra M, Nodari S, Trussardi E, Vizzardi E, Cas LD. [Dilated cardiomyopathy: indication and role of invasive evaluation]. Ital Heart J Suppl 2002; 3 (04) 412-418
  • 8 Dill T. Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging: non-invasive imaging. Heart 2008; 94 (07) 943-948
  • 9 Cummings KW, Bhalla S, Javidan-Nejad C, Bierhals AJ, Gutierrez FR, Woodard PK. A pattern-based approach to assessment of delayed enhancement in nonischemic cardiomyopathy at MR imaging. Radiographics 2009; 29 (01) 89-103
  • 10 Ohta Y, Kitao S, Yunaga H. et al. Myocardial delayed enhancement CT for the evaluation of heart failure: comparison to MRI. Radiology 2018; 288 (03) 682-691
  • 11 Chang S, Han K, Youn JC. et al. Utility of dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging in the assessment of myocardial delayed enhancement in patients with cardiomyopathy. Radiology 2018; 287 (02) 442-451
  • 12 Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V. et al; American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105 (04) 539-542
  • 13 Riederer SJ, Mistretta CA. Selective iodine imaging using K-edge energies in computerized x-ray tomography. Med Phys 1977; 4 (06) 474-481
  • 14 Assomull RG, Prasad SK, Lyne J. et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, fibrosis, and prognosis in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48 (10) 1977-1985
  • 15 Cabac-Pogorevici I, Muk B, Rustamova Y, Kalogeropoulos A, Tzeis S, Vardas P. Ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Pathophysiological insights, diagnostic management and the roles of revascularisation and device treatment. Gaps and dilemmas in the era of advanced technology. Eur J Heart Fail 2020; 22 (05) 789-799
  • 16 Francone M. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance in the evaluation of dilated cardiomyopathy: diagnostic contribution and prognostic significance. ISRN Radiol 2014; 2014: 365404