RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806817
Pathological Threshold of Patellar Tendon-Trochlear Groove Distance Using Magnetic Resonance Image in Patients with Patellar Instability
Limite patológico da distância tendão patelar-sulco da tróclea utilizando imagens de ressonância magnética em pacientes com instabilidade patelarFinancial Support The authors declare that they did not receive financial support from agencies in the public, private, or non-profit sectors to conduct the present study.
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate and compare the values of the patellar tendon-trochlear groove (PT-TG) distance in individuals with and without patellar instability. Additionally, we aimed to define a cut-off value for the pathological limit of the PT-TG through nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with patellar instability.
Methods
The PT-TG distance of 52 knees was measured in 48 individuals with objective patellar instability (instability group) by MRI. These measurements were compared with those made in 50 knees of 44 individuals without a history of patellar instability (control group).
Results
The PT-TG distance in the instability group (20.6 ± 5.0 mm) was greater than in the control group (11.8 ± 3.4 mm; p < 0.001). A value of 15.5 mm was determined as the pathological limit, with an accuracy of 81.4%, in MRI exams.
Conclusion
Individuals with patellar instability have statistically higher measurements of PT-TG when compared with patients without it. Therefore, values higher than 15.5 mm for PT-TG seen in MRI exams represent a pathological lateralization force of the extensor mechanism related to patellar instability.
Resumo
Objetivo
Avaliar e comparar a distância tendão patelar–sulco troclear (TP-ST) em indivíduos com e sem instabilidade patelar. Um segundo objetivo foi definir um limiar patológico de TP-ST por meio de ressonância magnética (RM) nuclear em pacientes com instabilidade patelar.
Métodos
A distância TP-ST de 52 joelhos foi medida em 48 indivíduos com instabilidade patelar objetiva (grupo instabilidade) por RM. Essas medidas foram comparadas àquelas feitas em 50 joelhos de 44 indivíduos sem histórico de instabilidade patelar (grupo controle).
Resultados
A distância TP-ST no grupo instabilidade (20,6 ± 5,0 mm) foi maior do que no grupo controle (11,8 ± 3,4 mm; p < 0,001). O valor de 15,5 mm foi determinado como limiar patológico, com acurácia de 81,4%, em exames de RM.
Conclusão
Indivíduos com instabilidade patelar apresentam medidas estatisticamente maiores de TP-ST em comparação a pacientes sem instabilidade. Portanto, valores de TP-ST superiores a 15,5 mm à RM representam uma força de lateralização patológica do mecanismo extensor relacionada à instabilidade patelar.
Keywords
joint instability - knee - magnetic resonance imaging - patellar ligament - patellofemoral jointPalavras-chave
articulação patelofemoral - imagem por ressonância magnética - instabilidade articular - joelho - ligamento patelarWork developed at Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia de Passo Fundo and Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 01. Juli 2024
Angenommen: 09. Januar 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Juni 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil
Rubens Rosso Nadal, Vinícius Canello Kuhn, Alexandre Codevilla Teixeira, Eduardo Bervian Júnior, Osmar Valadão Lopes Júnior. Pathological Threshold of Patellar Tendon-Trochlear Groove Distance Using Magnetic Resonance Image in Patients with Patellar Instability. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2025; 60: s00451806817.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806817
-
References
- 1 Atkin DM, Fithian DC, Marangi KS, Stone ML, Dobson BE, Mendelsohn C. Characteristics of patients with primary acute lateral patellar dislocation and their recovery within the first 6 months of injury. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (04) 472-479
- 2 Nietosvaara Y, Aalto K, Kallio PE. Acute patellar dislocation in children: incidence and associated osteochondral fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 1994; 14 (04) 513-515
- 3 Balcarek P, Jung K, Frosch KH, Stürmer KM. Value of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in patellar instability in the young athlete. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (08) 1756-1761
- 4 Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C. Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1994; 2 (01) 19-26
- 5 Diks MJ, Wymenga AB, Anderson PG. Patients with lateral tracking patella have better pain relief following CT-guided tuberosity transfer than patients with unstable patella. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003; 11 (06) 384-388
- 6 Pandit S, Frampton C, Stoddart J, Lynskey T. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance: normal values for males and females. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (12) 1799-1803
- 7 Camp CL, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. et al. CT and MRI measurements of tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distances are not equivalent in patients with patellar instability. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (08) 1835-1840
- 8 Schoettle PB, Zanetti M, Seifert B, Pfirrmann CW, Fucentese SF, Romero J. The tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance; a comparative study between CT and MRI scanning. Knee 2006; 13 (01) 26-31
- 9 – Dejour H, Walch G. La dysplasie luxante de la rotule. J Lyon Chir Genou 1987; 6: 85-88
- 10 Diederichs G, Issever AS, Scheffler S. MR imaging of patellar instability: injury patterns and assessment of risk factors. [published correction appears in Radiographics 2011;31(2):624] Radiographics 2010; 30 (04) 961-981
- 11 Elias DA, White LM, Fithian DC. Acute lateral patellar dislocation at MR imaging: injury patterns of medial patellar soft-tissue restraints and osteochondral injuries of the inferomedial patella. Radiology 2002; 225 (03) 736-743
- 12 Kirsch MD, Fitzgerald SW, Friedman H, Rogers LF. Transient lateral patellar dislocation: diagnosis with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161 (01) 109-113
- 13 Virolainen H, Visuri T, Kuusela T. Acute dislocation of the patella: MR findings. Radiology 1993; 189 (01) 243-246
- 14 – Saudan M, Fritschy D. [AT-TG (anterior tuberosity-trochlear groove): interobserver variability in CT measurements in subjects with patellar instability]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 2000; 86 (03) 250-255
- 15 Skelley N, Friedman M, McGinnis M, Smith C, Hillen T, Matava M. Inter- and intraobserver reliability in the MRI measurement of the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance and trochlea dysplasia. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (04) 873-878
- 16 Wilcox JJ, Snow BJ, Aoki SK, Hung M, Burks RT. Does landmark selection affect the reliability of tibial tubercle-trochlear groove measurements using MRI?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (08) 2253-2260
- 17 Thakkar RS, Del Grande F, Wadhwa V. et al. Patellar instability: CT and MRI measurements and their correlation with internal derangement findings. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (09) 3021-3028
- 18 Anley CM, Morris GV, Saithna A, James SL, Snow M. Defining the Role of the Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove and Tibial Tubercle-Posterior Cruciate Ligament Distances in the Work-up of Patients With Patellofemoral Disorders. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (06) 1348-1353
- 19 Camp CL, Heidenreich MJ, Dahm DL, Stuart MJ, Levy BA, Krych AJ. Individualizing the Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance: Patellar Instability Ratios That Predict Recurrent Instability. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (02) 393-399
- 20 Ho CP, James EW, Surowiec RK. et al. Systematic technique-dependent differences in CT versus MRI measurement of the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (03) 675-682
- 21 Dickens AJ, Morrell NT, Doering A, Tandberg D, Treme G. Tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance: defining normal in a pediatric population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (04) 318-324