Role of the Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Meetings in Rectal Cancer Management

Abstract

The management of rectal cancer is complex and requires the expertise of multiple disciplines and various treatment modalities. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions are essential for the optimal management of patients with rectal cancer.

An effective MDT is composed of core members from all treating specialities. A specialized radiologist plays a crucial role within the MDT. They are vital to the staging of cancer and the identification of poor prognostic features. Their input is key in planning treatment, including the type and extent of surgery and any neoadjuvant treatment.

MDTs must allocate sufficient time for members to prepare for the MDT and adequate time to discuss each case. A final plan of treatment is agreed upon by all attending members and well documented. The patient's care is discussed at multiple points following each treatment modality throughout the cancer treatment journey. Any changes in treatment are rediscussed at the MDT.

MDTs have demonstrated the ability to standardize care, leading to improved outcomes. MDTs also improve technical aspects of treatment, such as the quality of surgery and negative margins. These improvements are reflected in improved patient outcomes, including reduced recurrence rates and improved survival.

Keywords

conference - multidisciplinary - rectal cancer - team

Publication History

Article published online:
01 April 2025

• References

• 1 Wright FC, De Vito C, Langer B, Hunter A. Expert Panel on Multidisciplinary Cancer Conference Standards. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43 (06) 1002-1010
• 2 Taylor C, Shewbridge A, Harris J, Green JS. Benefits of multidisciplinary teamwork in the management of breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 2013; 5: 79-85
• 3 Walraven JEW, van der Hel OL, van der Hoeven JJM, Lemmens VEPP, Verhoeven RHA, Desar IME. Factors influencing the quality and functioning of oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: results of a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22 (01) 829
• 4 Effects of a multidisciplinary team on colorectal cancer treatment - ScienceDirect [Internet]. Accessed October 25, 2024 at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1682606×/215000894?via%3Dihub
• 5 MacDermid E, Hooton G, MacDonald M. et al. Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11 (03) 291-295
• 6 Richardson B, Preskitt J, Lichliter W. et al. The effect of multidisciplinary teams for rectal cancer on delivery of care and patient outcome: has the use of multidisciplinary teams for rectal cancer affected the utilization of available resources, proportion of patients meeting the standard of care, and does this translate into changes in patient outcome?. Am J Surg 2016; 211 (01) 46-52
• 7 Jeon SK, Kim SH, Shin CI. et al. Role of dedicated subspecialized radiologists in multidisciplinary team discussions on lower gastrointestinal tract cancers. Korean J Radiol 2022; 23 (07) 732-741
• 8 Davison AG, Eraut CD, Haque AS. et al. Telemedicine for multidisciplinary lung cancer meetings. J Telemed Telecare 2004; 10 (03) 140-143
• 9 Sievers CK, Kratz JD, Zurbriggen LD. et al. The multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer: present and future paradigms. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2016; 29 (03) 232-238
• 10 Tran TH, de Boer J, Gyorki DE, Krishnasamy M. Optimising the quality of multidisciplinary team meetings: a narrative review. Cancer Med 2022; 11 (09) 1965-1971
• 11 Lamb BW, Brown KF, Nagpal K, Vincent C, Green JSA, Sevdalis N. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18 (08) 2116-2125
• 12 Jung SM, Hong YS, Kim TW. et al. Impact of a multidisciplinary team approach for managing advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer. World J Surg 2018; 42 (07) 2227-2233
• 13 Dew K, Stubbe M, Signal L. et al. Cancer care decision making in multidisciplinary meetings. Qual Health Res 2015; 25 (03) 397-407
• 14 Horvat N, Carlos Tavares Rocha C, Clemente Oliveira B, Petkovska I, Gollub MJ. MRI of rectal cancer: tumor staging, imaging techniques, and management. Radiographics 2019; 39 (02) 367-387
• 15 Burton S, Brown G, Daniels IR, Norman AR, Mason B, Cunningham D. Royal Marsden Hospital, Colorectal Cancer Network. MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?. Br J Cancer 2006; 94 (03) 351-357
• 16 Taylor FGM, Quirke P, Heald RJ. et al; Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer European Equivalence Study Study Group. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32 (01) 34-43
• 17 Kalisz KR, Enzerra MD, Paspulati RM. MRI evaluation of the response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Radiographics 2019; 39 (02) 538-556
• 18 Sugarbaker PH, Jelinek JS. The radiologist's role in the multidisciplinary team for patients with colon cancer peritoneal metastases. Surg Oncol 2022; 40: 101690
• 19 Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Tsai LL, Masciocchi M, Arora SS, Kielar AZ. Role of the radiologist at HCC multidisciplinary conference and use of the LR-TR algorithm for improving workflow. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46 (08) 3558-3564
• 20 Neri E, Gabelloni M, Bäuerle T. et al. Involvement of radiologists in oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings: an international survey by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging. Eur Radiol 2021; 31 (02) 983-991
• 21 Snelgrove RC, Subendran J, Jhaveri K. et al. Effect of multidisciplinary cancer conference on treatment plan for patients with primary rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58 (07) 653-658
• 22 Patkar V, Acosta D, Davidson T, Jones A, Fox J, Keshtgar M. Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: evidence, challenges, and the role of clinical decision support technology. Int J Breast Cancer 2011; 2011: 831605
• 23 Chang KH, Smith MJ, McAnena OJ, Aprjanto AS, Dowdall JF. Increased use of multidisciplinary treatment modalities adds little to the outcome of rectal cancer treated by optimal total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27 (10) 1275-1283
• 24 Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R. et al. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence?. BMJ 2010; 340: c951
• 25 Obias VJ, Reynolds Jr HL. Multidisciplinary teams in the management of rectal cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2007; 20 (03) 143-147
• 26 Munro A, Brown M, Niblock P, Steele R, Carey F. Do multidisciplinary team (MDT) processes influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer? A population-based experience. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 686
• 27 Jalil R, Ahmed M, Green JS, Sevdalis N. Factors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: an interview study of the provider perspective. Int J Surg 2013; 11 (05) 389-394
• 28 Macaskill EJ, Thrush S, Walker EM, Dixon JM. Surgeons' views on multi-disciplinary breast meetings. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42 (07) 905-908
• 29 Lamb BW, Sevdalis N, Arora S, Pinto A, Vincent C, Green JS. Teamwork and team decision-making at multidisciplinary cancer conferences: barriers, facilitators, and opportunities for improvement. World J Surg 2011; 35 (09) 1970-1976
• 30 Sarkar S, Arora S, Lamb BW, Green JSA, Sevdalis N, Darzi A. Case review in urology multidisciplinary team meetings: what members think of its functioning. J Clin Urol 2014; 7 (06) 394-402
• 31 Lanceley A, Savage J, Menon U, Jacobs I. Influences on multidisciplinary team decision-making. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18 (02) 215-222
• 32 Basta YL, Bolle S, Fockens P, Tytgat KMAJ. The value of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24 (09) 2669-2678
• 33 Kelly MJ, Lloyd TDR, Marshall D, Garcea G, Sutton CD, Beach M. A snapshot of MDT working and patient mapping in the UK colorectal cancer centres in 2002. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5 (06) 577-581