Endoscopy 2025; 57(S 02): S310-S311
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1805762
Abstracts | ESGE Days 2025
ePosters

Evaluation of Endoscopic Bariatric Treatments: Endoscopic Intragastric Balloon Placement and Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (Apollo method). Efficacy and Safety 1 Year Follow-Up

Authors

  • L Batista

    1   Clínica ServiDigest, Barcelona, Spain
  • P Gonçalves Da Cunha

    1   Clínica ServiDigest, Barcelona, Spain
  • L Yip Baldeón

    1   Clínica ServiDigest, Barcelona, Spain
  • L Bustillos De Grimaldo

    1   Clínica ServiDigest, Barcelona, Spain
  • D Schwarzstein

    1   Clínica ServiDigest, Barcelona, Spain
  • M Bacardit Vendrell

    1   Clínica ServiDigest, Barcelona, Spain
  • C Colomer Puig

    1   Clínica ServiDigest, Barcelona, Spain
  • C Feliu

    1   Clínica ServiDigest, Barcelona, Spain
  • J Merlo Mas

    1   Clínica ServiDigest, Barcelona, Spain
 

Aims Endoscopic intragastric balloon placement (EIB) and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) using the Apollo method are two effective techniques for weight loss in patients with obesity. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of both endoscopic bariatric techniques

Methods We conducted a one-center, descriptive, retrospective analysis of patients who underwent EIB (6 months) and ESG between 2016 and 2023, with a 1 year follow-up. All patients followed the protocols of our multidisciplinary Obesity Unit. We assessed clinical, anthropometric, and analytical parameters, as well as safety. We performed a multiple linear regression analysis to determine predictive variables for total percentage weight loss (% TWL)

Results A total of 103 patients were analyzed (39 EIB, 64 ESG). No significant differences were found regarding age, gender, or comorbidities (hypertension, type 2, diabetes, dyslipidemia, severe obstructive sleep apnea, and presence and degree of steatosis). Significant differences were observed between the EIB and ESG groups in terms of: BMI 35.7 (SD 4.14) vs. 38.4 (SD 4.8), p=0.005; obesity grade: 41% type I vs. 54.7% type II, p=0.010; and completed endocrinology/nutrition of medical appointment scheduling, 66% vs. 82%, p=0.000. There was a significant improvement in the lipid profile in the EIB group and in the glycemic profile in the ESG group after one year. All patients achieved remission of pre-diabetes after one year. The predictive variables for% TWL at one year included gender, initial BMI, and type of treatment. Significant differences in% TWL,% EWL, and BMI at one year in the Apollo group. Eight cases in the EIB group experienced early removal (mean 52 days), while one ESG case presented hematemesis and another with abdominal abscess [1] [2] [3].

Conclusions Both EIB and ESG are safe and effective techniques, the ESG group demonstrated a more significant weight loss at one year. Both techniques improve glycemic and lipid profiles, considering as therapeutic alternatives for patients with obesity and other metabolic comorbidities



Publication History

Article published online:
27 March 2025

© 2025. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Dolan RD, Schulman AR.. Endoscopic Approaches to Obesity Management. Annu Rev Med 2022; 73: 423-438
  • 2 Mauro A, Lusetti F, Scalvini D, Bardone M, De Grazia F, Mazza S, Pozzi L, Ravetta V, Rovedatti L, Sgarlata C, Strada E, Torello Viera F, Veronese L, Olivo Romero DE, Anderloni A.. A Comprehensive Review on Bariatric Endoscopy: Where We Are Now and Where We Are Going. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59 (3): 636
  • 3 Espinet Coll E, López-Nava Breviere G, Nebreda Durán J, Marra-López Valenciano C, Turró Arau R, Esteban López-Jamar JM, Muñoz-Navas M.. Documento Español de Consenso en Endoscopia Bariátrica. Parte 2. Tratamientos endoscópicos específicos. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2019; 111 (2): 140-154