CT-Guided Percutaneous Lung Biopsy: Important Steps with “Tips and Tricks” for Optimal Yield

Abstract

Tissue diagnosis plays a major role in the management of patients with lung lesions, especially if malignancy is suspected. Computed tomography-guided biopsy of lung lesions is a well-established procedure. We share a few “tips and tricks” to keep the procedure safe and comfortable to the patient with optimal yield.

Keywords

lung biopsy - CT-guided - lung lesion - lung malignancy - pneumothorax

Copyright Regarding Drawings

The drawings used in the manuscript are original works of the primary author (Ch Jagadeesh Kumar) of the manuscript. Permission is given for use of this in the manuscript.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. März 2025

• References

• 1 Haaga JR, Alfidi RJ. Precise biopsy localization by computer tomography. Radiology 1976; 118 (03) 603-607
• 2 Ferretti GR, Busser B, de Fraipont F. et al. Adequacy of CT-guided biopsies with histomolecular subtyping of pulmonary adenocarcinomas: influence of ATS/ERS/IASLC guidelines. Lung Cancer 2013; 82 (01) 69-75
• 3 Manhire A, Charig M, Clelland C. et al; BTS. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax 2003; 58 (11) 920-936
• 4 Jones AK, Dixon RG, Collins JD, Walser EM, Nikolic B. Society of Interventional Radiology Health and Safety Committee. Best practice guidelines for CT-guided interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29 (04) 518-519
• 5 Society of Interventional Radiology - ACR_SIR Needle Biopsy [Internet]. Accessed February 11, 2025 at: https://www.sirweb.org/practice-resources/clinical-practice/guidelines-and-statements/nonvascular/collaboration_endorsements/acr_sir-needle-biopsy/
• 6 Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, Rose SC. Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (07) 969-975
• 7 Hadi M, Walker C, Desborough M. et al. CIRSE standards of practice on peri-operative anticoagulation management during interventional radiology procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2021; 44 (04) 523-536
• 8 Veltri A, Bargellini I, Giorgi L, Almeida PAMS, Akhan O. CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40 (10) 1501-1513
• 9 de Margerie-Mellon C, de Bazelaire C, de Kerviler E. Image-guided biopsy in primary lung cancer: why, when and how. Diagn Interv Imaging 2016; 97 (10) 965-972
• 10 Wu CC, Maher MM, Shepard JAO. CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest: preprocedural evaluation and technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196 (05) W511-4
• 11 Ahmed M, Flannery A, Daneshvar C, Breen D. PET and neck ultrasound for the detection of cervical lymphadenopathy in patients with lung cancer and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Respiration 2018; 96 (02) 138-143
• 12 Kobayashi K, Bhargava P, Raja S. et al. Image-guided biopsy: what the interventional radiologist needs to know about PET/CT. Radiographics 2012; 32 (05) 1483-1501
• 13 Wang J, Zhang T, Xu Y. et al. Comparison between percutaneous transthoracic co-axial needle CT-guided biopsy and transbronchial lung biopsy for the diagnosis of persistent pulmonary consolidation. Insights Imaging 2023; 14 (01) 80
• 14 Davidson JC, Rahim S, Hanks SE. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology consensus guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions-part I: review of anticoagulation agents and clinical considerations: endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30 (08) 1155-1167
• 15 Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology consensus guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions-part II: recommendations: endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30 (08) 1168-1184.e1
• 16 Kohi MP, Fidelman N, Behr S. et al. Periprocedural patient care. Radiographics 2015; 35 (06) 1766-1778
• 17 Digumarthy SR, Kovacina B, Otrakji A, Lanuti M, Shepard JAO, Sharma A. Percutaneous CT guided lung biopsy in patients with pulmonary hypertension: assessment of complications. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85 (02) 466-471
• 18 ACR–SIR PRACTICE GUIDELINE ON INFORMED CONSENT FOR IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES. https://www.sirweb.org/globalassets/aasociety-of-interventional-radiology-home-page/practice-resources/standards_pdfs/final_acr_doc7109ed01.pdf
• 19 Tsai IC, Tsai WL, Chen MC. et al. CT-guided core biopsy of lung lesions: a primer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193 (05) 1228-1235
• 20 Kamath SD, McMahon BJ. Update on anticoagulation: what the interventional radiologist needs to know. Semin Intervent Radiol 2016; 33 (02) 122-131
• 21 Pittaro A, Dengo C, Battistel M. et al. Preliminary results in paediatric percutaneous transthoracic procedures. EPOS ECR 2018 / C-0562. https://epos.myesr.org/poster/esr/ecr2018/C-0562/References#poster
• 22 Winokur RS, Pua BB, Sullivan BW, Madoff DC. Percutaneous lung biopsy: technique, efficacy, and complications. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013; 30 (02) 121-127
• 23 Society of Interventional Radiology - ACR_SIR Sedation Analgesia [Internet]. Accessed February 11, 2025 at: https://www.sirweb.org/practice-resources/clinical-practice/guidelines-and-statements/safety-professional-development/collaboration_endorsements/acr_sir_sedation_analgesia/
• 24 Moran TC, Kaye AD, Mai AH, Bok LR. Sedation, analgesia, and local anesthesia: a review for general and interventional radiologists. Radiographics 2013; 33 (02) E47-E60
• 25 Cheng YC, Tsai SH, Cheng Y, Chen JH, Chai JW, Chen CCC. Percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy: comparison between C-arm cone-beam CT and conventional CT guidance. Transl Oncol 2015; 8 (04) 258-264
• 26 Kavelj I, Novosel L, Babic N, Zadravec D. Percutaneous transthoracic CT guided biopsies – what have we found. EPOS [Internet]. January 14, 2018. ECR 2018 (C–2986). Accessed April 25, 2021 at: https://epos.myesr.org/poster/esr/ecr2018/C-2986
• 27 Drumm O, Joyce EA, de Blacam C. et al. CT-guided lung biopsy: effect of biopsy-side down position on pneumothorax and chest tube placement. Radiology 2019; 292 (01) 190-196
• 28 Sarti M, Brehmer WP, Gay SB. Low-dose techniques in CT-guided interventions. Radiographics 2012; 32 (04) 1109-1119 , discussion 1119–1120
• 29 Wu CC, Maher MM, Shepard JAO. Complications of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest: prevention and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196 (06) W678-82
• 30 Stecker MS, Balter S, Towbin RB. et al; SIR Safety and Health Committee, CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee. Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20 (7, Suppl): S263-S273
• 31 Angle JF, Nemcek Jr AA, Cohen AM. et al; SIR Standards Division, Joint Commission Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure, Wrong Person Surgery. Quality improvement guidelines for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, and wrong person errors: application of the joint commission “Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure, Wrong Person Surgery” to the practice of interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (08) 1145-1151
• 32 Chehab MA, Thakor AS, Tulin-Silver S. et al. Adult and pediatric antibiotic prophylaxis during vascular and IR procedures: a Society of Interventional Radiology practice parameter update endorsed by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe and the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29 (11) 1483-1501.e2
• 33 Huo YR, Chan MV, Habib AR, Lui I, Ridley L. Pneumothorax rates in CT-Guided lung biopsies: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors. Br J Radiol 2020; 93 (1108) 20190866
• 34 Calero Garcia MR, Pérez Peláez N, Galarraga GG. et al. Ct-guided biopsy of pulmonary lesions. Our experience with 577 cases. EPOS [Internet]; ECR 2018 (C–2639). Accessed February 11, 2025 at: https://epos.myesr.org/poster/esr/ecr2018/C-2639/findings%20and%20procedure%20details
• 35 Guimaraes MD, de Andrade MQ, da Fonte AC, Chojniak R, Gross JL. CT-guided cutting needle biopsy of lung lesions–an effective procedure for adequate material and specific diagnose. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80 (03) e488-e490
• 36 Jelitto-Gorska M, Piskunowicz M, Regent BJ. et al. Procedure-related pneumothorax risk factors - does the gauge of the needle matters when a lung tumour is punctured?. EPOS [Internet]. ECR 2018 (C–2001). Accessed April 25, 2021 at: https://epos.myesr.org/poster/esr/ecr2018/C-2001
• 37 Geraghty PR, Kee ST, McFarlane G, Razavi MK, Sze DY, Dake MD. CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of pulmonary nodules: needle size and pneumothorax rate. Radiology 2003; 229 (02) 475-481
• 38 Yoshimatsu R, Yamagami T, Tanaka O. et al. Comparison of fully automated and semi-automated biopsy needles for lung biopsy under CT fluoroscopic guidance. Br J Radiol 2012; 85 (1011) 208-213
• 39 Kho Sze, Chan Swee, Chai Chan. et al. (2021) COMPARISON OF FULLY VS SEMI-AUTOMATED CORE BIOPSY NEEDLE IN PULMONOLOGIST-LED PERIPHERAL THORACIC LESION SAMPLING UNDER ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE. Chest 160. A2035.
• 40 Anderson JM, Murchison J, Patel D. CT-guided lung biopsy: factors influencing diagnostic yield and complication rate. Clin Radiol 2003; 58 (10) 791-797
• 41 Peker A, Gulcu A, Gezer NS. et al. CT- guided transthoracic lung biopsy: a comparison of a co-axial core biopsy with non co-axial fine needle aspiration biopsy and factors influencing complications. EPOS [Internet]. January 12, 2018. ECR 2018 (C–2636). Accessed April 25, 2021 at: https://epos.myesr.org/poster/esr/ecr2018/C-2636
• 42 Sangha BS, Hague CJ, Jessup J, O'Connor R, Mayo JR. Transthoracic computed tomography-guided lung nodule biopsy: comparison of core needle and fine needle aspiration techniques. Can Assoc Radiol J 2016; 67 (03) 284-289
• 43 Charig MJ, Phillips AJ. CT-guided cutting needle biopsy of lung lesions–safety and efficacy of an out-patient service. Clin Radiol 2000; 55 (12) 964-969
• 44 D'Antuono F, Macera A, Coppola M. et al. CT guided fine needle aspiration (FNAB) of pulmonary nodules ‘with a little help from our pathologist friends’. EPOS [Internet]. ECR 2018 (C–2028). Accessed April 25, 2021 at: https://epos.myesr.org/poster/esr/ecr2018/C-2028
• 45 Fassina A, Corradin M, Zardo D, Cappellesso R, Corbetti F, Fassan M. Role and accuracy of rapid on-site evaluation of CT-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of lung nodules. Cytopathology 2011; 22 (05) 306-312
• 46 Huang M-D. Accuracy and complications of CT-guided pulmonary core biopsy in small nodules: a single-center experience. Accessed April 25, 2021 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6651998/
• 47 Lehmann S, Frank N. An overview of percutaneous CT-guided lung biopsies. J Radiol Nurs 2018; 37 (01) 2-8
• 48 Zapata IV, González AS, Martínez JMP, del Castillo BMA, Belmonte MJG, Rodriguez MLR. Sealing the needle track with saline solution after lung biopsy decreases the risk of pneumothorax. EPOS [Internet]. ECR 2018 (C–1787). Accessed April 25, 2021 at: https://epos.myesr.org/poster/esr/ecr2018/C-1787
• 49 Heerink WJ, de Bock GH, de Jonge GJ, Groen HJM, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M. Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2017; 27 (01) 138-148
• 50 Tavare AN, Hare SS, Miller FNA, Hammond CJ, Edey A, Devaraj A. A survey of UK percutaneous lung biopsy practice: current practices in the era of early detection, oncogenetic profiling, and targeted treatments. Clin Radiol 2018; 73 (09) 800-809
• 51 Fernandez-Lobo V, Parra JA, Arce ABB. et al. Evaluation of the positive predictive value in Transthoracic lung biopsies. EPOS [Internet]. ECR 2018 (C–0682). Accessed April 25, 2021 at: https://epos.myesr.org/poster/esr/ecr2018/C-0682
• 52 Fernandez-Lobo V, Parra JA, Peña E. et al. Transthoracic lung biopsy. The non tumoral results. EPOS [Internet]. January 12, 2018. ECR 2018 (C–2833). Accessed April 25, 2021 at: https://epos.myesr.org/poster/esr/ecr2018/C-2833
• 53 Gelbman BD, Cham MD, Kim W. et al. Radiographic and clinical characterization of false negative results from CT-guided needle biopsies of lung nodules. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7 (05) 815-820
• 54 Shera FA, Shera TA, Shah OA. et al. Pneumothorax after CT-guided lung biopsy: What next?. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2023; 33 (03) 309-314
• 55 Lang D, Reinelt V, Horner A. et al. Complications of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: a short report on current literature and a case of systemic air embolism. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2018; 130 (7-8): 288-292
• 56 Deng CJ, Dai FQ, Qian K. et al. Clinical updates of approaches for biopsy of pulmonary lesions based on systematic review. BMC Pulm Med 2018; 18 (01) 146
• 57 Elshafee AS, Karch A, Ringe KI. et al. Complications of CT-guided lung biopsy with a non-coaxial semi-automated 18 gauge biopsy system: frequency, severity and risk factors. PLoS One 2019; 14 (03) e0213990
• 58 Yildirim E, Kirbas I, Harman A. et al. CT-guided cutting needle lung biopsy using modified coaxial technique: factors effecting risk of complications. Eur J Radiol 2009; 70 (01) 57-60
• 59 Kuriyama T, Masago K, Okada Y, Katakami N. Computed tomography-guided lung biopsy: association between biopsy needle angle and pneumothorax development. Mol Clin Oncol 2018; 8 (02) 336-341
• 60 Yamagami T, Kato T, Hirota T, Yoshimatsu R, Matsumoto T, Nishimura T. Duration of pneumothorax as a complication of CT-guided lung biopsy. Australas Radiol 2006; 50 (05) 435-441
• 61 Lingegowda D, Gupta B, Gehani A, Sen S, Ghosh P. Optimization of the lung biopsy procedure: a primer. J Clin Interv Radiol ISVIR 2022; 06 (03) 190-201