Sensory Inhibition and Tinnitus: Measurement of Auditory Gating

Abstract

Tinnitus is the perception of sound without the presence of an external stimulus. The mechanisms associated with tinnitus are not entirely known, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. Although tinnitus mechanisms are not entirely known, there is evidence supporting an association between tinnitus with cochlear damage, reduced inhibition, and atypical cortical function. These mechanisms have been studied in animal models and people with tinnitus using a variety of different approaches. One approach that is a possible indicator of tinnitus in humans is sensory or auditory gating, which is a measure of inhibition. The goals of this article are to (1) review the mechanistic evidence associating tinnitus with cochlear damage and reduced inhibition, (2) discuss evidence of inhibitory impairments in people with tinnitus represented by auditory gating, and (3) address potential future directions to improve our ability to evaluate auditory gating mechanisms in people with tinnitus.

Keywords

tinnitus - sensory gating - auditory gating - inhibition

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. März 2025

• References

• 1 Nondahl DM, Cruickshanks KJ, Huang GH. et al. Tinnitus and its risk factors in the Beaver Dam offspring study. Int J Audiol 2011; 50 (05) 313-320
• 2 Sindhusake D, Mitchell P, Newall P, Golding M, Rochtchina E, Rubin G. Prevalence and characteristics of tinnitus in older adults: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study. Int J Audiol 2003; 42 (05) 289-294
• 3 Sindhusake D, Golding M, Newall P, Rubin G, Jakobsen K, Mitchell P. Risk factors for tinnitus in a population of older adults: the blue mountains hearing study. Ear Hear 2003; 24 (06) 501-507
• 4 Axelsson A, Ringdahl A. Tinnitus – a study of its prevalence and characteristics. Br J Audiol 1989; 23 (01) 53-62
• 5 Searchfield GD. et al. The impact of hearing loss on tinnitus severity. Aust N Z J Audiol 2007; 29 (02) 67-76
• 6 Mazurek B, Olze H, Haupt H, Szczepek AJ. The more the worse: the grade of noise-induced hearing loss associates with the severity of tinnitus. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010; 7 (08) 3071-3079
• 7 Eggermont JJ, Roberts LE. Tinnitus: animal models and findings in humans. Cell Tissue Res 2015; 361 (01) 311-336
• 8 Noreña AJ, Farley BJ. Tinnitus-related neural activity: theories of generation, propagation, and centralization. Hear Res 2013; 295: 161-171
• 9 Sedley W. Tinnitus: Does gain explain?. Neuroscience 2019; 407: 213-228
• 10 Morse K, Vander Werff KR. Cortical auditory evoked potential indices of impaired sensory gating in people with chronic tinnitus. Ear Hear 2024; 45 (03) 730-741
• 11 Jafari Z, Baguley D, Kolb BE, Mohajerani MH. A systematic review and meta-analysis of extended high-frequency hearing thresholds in tinnitus with a normal audiogram. Ear Hear 2022; 43 (06) 1643-1652
• 12 Serra L, Novanta G, Sampaio AL, Augusto Oliveira C, Granjeiro R, Braga SC. The study of otoacoustic emissions and the suppression of otoacoustic emissions in subjects with tinnitus and normal hearing: an insight to tinnitus etiology. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 19 (02) 171-175
• 13 Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 2009; 29 (45) 14077-14085
• 14 Morse K, Vander Werff K. The effect of tinnitus and related characteristics on subcortical auditory processing. Ear Hear 2023; 44 (06) 1344-1353
• 15 Bramhall NF, Konrad-Martin D, McMillan GP. Tinnitus and auditory perception after a history of noise exposure: relationship to auditory brainstem response measures. Ear Hear 2018; 39 (05) 881-894
• 16 Gu JW, Herrmann BS, Levine RA, Melcher JR. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials suggest a role for the ventral cochlear nucleus in tinnitus. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2012; 13 (06) 819-833
• 17 Schaette R, McAlpine D. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci 2011; 31 (38) 13452-13457
• 18 Lemaire MC, Beutter P. Brainstem auditory evoked responses in patients with tinnitus. Audiology 1995; 34 (06) 287-300
• 19 Eggermont JJ. The Neuroscience of Tinnitus. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2012
• 20 Henry JA, Roberts LE, Caspary DM, Theodoroff SM, Salvi RJ. Underlying mechanisms of tinnitus: review and clinical implications. J Am Acad Audiol 2014; 25 (01) 5-22 , quiz 126
• 21 Baguley D, Fagelson M. Tinnitus: Clinical and Research Perspectives. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2016
• 22 Rauschecker JP, Leaver AM, Mühlau M. Tuning out the noise: limbic-auditory interactions in tinnitus. Neuron 2010; 66 (06) 819-826
• 23 Caspary DM, Llano DA. Auditory thalamic circuits and GABA_A receptor function: putative mechanisms in tinnitus pathology. Hear Res 2017; 349: 197-207
• 24 Kaltenbach JA. Tinnitus: models and mechanisms. Hear Res 2011; 276 (1-2): 52-60
• 25 De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Langguth B, Llinas R. Thalamocortical dysrhythmia: a theoretical update in tinnitus. Front Neurol 2015; 6: 124
• 26 Cederroth CR, Lugo A, Edvall NK. et al. Association between hyperacusis and tinnitus. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (08) 2412
• 27 Cromwell HC, Mears RP, Wan L, Boutros NN. Sensory gating: a translational effort from basic to clinical science. Clin EEG Neurosci 2008; 39 (02) 69-72
• 28 Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965; 150 (3699) 971-979
• 29 Tonndorf J. The analogy between tinnitus and pain: a suggestion for a physiological basis of chronic tinnitus. Hear Res 1987; 28 (2-3): 271-275
• 30 Møller AR. Tinnitus and pain. Prog Brain Res 2007; 166: 47-53
• 31 Dalecki A, Johnstone SJ, Croft RJ. Clarifying the functional process represented by P50 suppression. Int J Psychophysiol 2015; 96 (03) 149-154
• 32 Dalecki A, Croft RJ, Johnstone SJ. An evaluation of P50 paired-click methodologies. Psychophysiology 2011; 48 (12) 1692-1700
• 33 Patterson JV, Hetrick WP, Boutros NN. et al. P50 sensory gating ratios in schizophrenics and controls: a review and data analysis. Psychiatry Res 2008; 158 (02) 226-247
• 34 Javitt DC, Freedman R. Sensory processing dysfunction in the personal experience and neuronal machinery of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2015; 172 (01) 17-31
• 35 Smith DM, Grant B, Fisher DJ, Borracci G, Labelle A, Knott VJ. Auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia correlate with P50 gating. Clin Neurophysiol 2013; 124 (07) 1329-1335
• 36 Lijffijt M, Moeller FG, Boutros NN. et al. Diminished P50, N100 and P200 auditory sensory gating in bipolar I disorder. Psychiatry Res 2009; 167 (03) 191-201
• 37 Ralston L, Campbell J, Gilley P, Nielson M, Brown K. Sensory gating networks in normal-hearing adults with minimal tinnitus. Am J Audiol 2024; •••: 1-11 (online ahead of print)
• 38 Vlcek P, Bob P, Raboch J. Sensory disturbances, inhibitory deficits, and the P50 wave in schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2014; 10: 1309-1315
• 39 Campbell J, Nielsen M, LaBrec A, Bean C. Sensory inhibition is related to variable speech perception in noise in adults with normal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2020; 63 (05) 1595-1607
• 40 Campbell J, Nielsen M, Bean C, LaBrec A. Auditory gating in hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2020; 31 (08) 559-565
• 41 Korzyukov O, Pflieger ME, Wagner M. et al. Generators of the intracranial P50 response in auditory sensory gating. Neuroimage 2007; 35 (02) 814-826
• 42 Vanneste S, Alsalman O, De Ridder D. Top-down and bottom-up regulated auditory phantom perception. J Neurosci 2019; 39 (02) 364-378
• 43 Rauschecker JP, May ES, Maudoux A, Ploner M. Frontostriatal gating of tinnitus and chronic pain. Trends Cogn Sci 2015; 19 (10) 567-578
• 44 Campbell J, LaBrec A, Bean C, Nielsen M, So W. Auditory gating and extended high-frequency thresholds in normal-hearing adults with minimal tinnitus. Am J Audiol 2019; 28 (1S): 209-224
• 45 Campbell J, Bean C, LaBrec A. Normal hearing young adults with mild tinnitus: reduced inhibition as measured through sensory gating. Audiology Res 2018; 8 (02) 214
• 46 Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (02) 143-148
• 47 Newman CW, Sandridge SA, Jacobson GP. Psychometric adequacy of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) for evaluating treatment outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9 (02) 153-160
• 48 Campbell J, Sharma A. Compensatory changes in cortical resource allocation in adults with hearing loss. Front Syst Neurosci 2013; 7: 71
• 49 Gafoor SA, Uppunda AK. Sensory gating to speech and nonspeech stimulus and its relationship to speech perception in noise. Am J Audiol 2023; 32 (04) 889-897
• 50 Henry JA. “Measurement” of tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (08) e276-e285
• 51 Lamberti JS, Schwarzkopf SB, Boutros N, Crilly JF, Martin R. Within-session changes in sensory gating assessed by P50 evoked potentials in normal subjects. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1993; 17 (05) 781-791
• 52 Smith DA, Boutros NN, Schwarzkopf SB. Reliability of P50 auditory event-related potential indices of sensory gating. Psychophysiology 1994; 31 (05) 495-502
• 53 Naber G, Kathmann N, Engel RR. P50 suppression in normal subjects: Influence of stimulus intensity, test repetition, and presentation mode. J Psychophysiol 1992; 6 (01) 47-53
• 54 Boutros NN, Overall J, Zouridakis G. Test-retest reliability of the P50 mid-latency auditory evoked response. Psychiatry Res 1991; 39 (02) 181-192
• 55 Rentzsch J, Jockers-Scherübl MC, Boutros NN, Gallinat J. Test-retest reliability of P50, N100 and P200 auditory sensory gating in healthy subjects. Int J Psychophysiol 2008; 67 (02) 81-90
• 56 Kathmann N, Engel RR. Sensory gating in normals and schizophrenics: a failure to find strong P50 suppression in normals. Biol Psychiatry 1990; 27 (11) 1216-1226
• 57 Tremblay KL, Friesen L, Martin BA, Wright R. Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds. Ear Hear 2003; 24 (03) 225-232
• 58 Bidelman GM, Pousson M, Dugas C, Fehrenbach A. Test-retest reliability of dual-recorded brainstem versus cortical auditory-evoked potentials to speech. J Am Acad Audiol 2018; 29 (02) 164-174
• 59 Walhovd KB, Fjell AM. One-year test-retest reliability of auditory ERPs in young and old adults. Int J Psychophysiol 2002; 46 (01) 29-40