Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1804888
Effect of Ceramic Thickness and Adhesive Light Curing on Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Enamel
Funding This research was funded by PRPPG UNITAU, grant number ODO_169_2020.

Abstract
Objectives For cementation of ceramic restorations, a layer of adhesive followed by resin cement is applied to the treated enamel surface. The light activation of adhesive may occur before or simultaneously with the resin cement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of ceramic thickness and previous light activation of adhesive on shear strength of resin cement to enamel.
Materials and Methods Vestibular bovine enamel was bonded to lithium disilicate ceramic cylinders with resin cement. The samples were divided into two groups, according to the ceramic thickness (1 or 2 mm). The cylinders had one surface treated for cementation and the enamel surface was treated with acid etching and adhesive system. Only half of samples received light activation of the adhesive prior to cementation. The samples were stored for 30 days in water at 37°C, and then subjected to the shear bond strength test.
Statistical Analysis Two-way analysis of variance was applied to evaluate the influence of previous light activation and ceramic thickness on the bond strength to enamel (α = 0.05).
Results The results of this study indicated that there is no significant difference in the shear adhesive strength between ceramics and dental enamel in relation to the factors evaluated.
Conclusion It is concluded that bond strength is not affected by neither the previous adhesive light activation nor ceramic thickness (1 or 2 mm).
Data Availability Statement
Data are available under request.
Publication History
Article published online:
23 April 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Saati K, Valizadeh S, Anaraki SN, Moosavi N. Effect of aging on color stability of amine-free resin cement through the ceramic laminate veneer. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2021; 18: 99
- 2 Marchionatti AME, Wandscher VF, May MM, Bottino MA, May LG. Color stability of ceramic laminate veneers cemented with light-polymerizing and dual-polymerizing luting agent: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118 (05) 604-610
- 3 Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015; 28 (03) 227-235
- 4 Mazão JD, Braga S, Brangança G, Zancopé K, Price RB, Soares CJ. Effect of ceramic thickness on light attenuation, degree of conversion, knoop hardness, and elastic modulus of four luting resins. Oper Dent 2023; 48 (02) 226-235
- 5 Sakaguchi RL, Ferracane J, Powers JM. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials. St. Louis, Missouri, United states: Elsevier; 2009
- 6 Gresnigt MMM, Braeckmans A, van der Made SAM, Naves LZ. Partial anterior indirect restorations in cases with dentin exposure. Int J Esthet Dent 2021; 16 (04) 554-569
- 7 Simon JF, de Rijk WG. Dental cements. Inside Dent 2006; 2: 42-47
- 8 Nonato RF, Moreira PHA, Silva DOD. et al. Long-term evaluation of bonding performance of universal adhesives based on different dentinal moisture levels. J Adhes Dent 2022; 24: 395-406
- 9 Lührs AK, De Munck J, Geurtsen W, Van Meerbeek B. Composite cements benefit from light-curing. Dent Mater 2014; 30 (03) 292-301
- 10 Oliveira DC, Souza-Júnior EJ, Prieto LT, Coppini EK, Maia RR, Paulillo LA. Color stability and polymerization behavior of direct esthetic restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014; 26 (04) 288-295
- 11 Kim JS, Choi YH, Cho BH. et al. Effect of light-cure time of adhesive resin on the thickness of the oxygen-inhibited layer and the microtensile bond strength to dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006; 78 (01) 115-123
- 12 Collares FMPF, Leitune VCB, Samuel SMW. Discrepancies in degree of conversion measurements by FTIR. Braz Oral Res 2014; 28: 9-15
- 13 Pires JA, Cvitko E, Denehy GE, Swift Jr EJ. Effects of curing tip distance on light intensity and composite resin microhardness. Quintessence Int 1993; 24 (07) 517-521
- 14 Janda R, Roulet JF, Kaminsky M, Steffin G, Latta M. Color stability of resin matrix restorative materials as a function of the method of light activation. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112 (03) 280-285
- 15 Goldberg M. In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components: a review. Clin Oral Investig 2008; 12 (01) 1-8
- 16 Pilo R, Cardash HS. Post-irradiation polymerization of different anterior and posterior visible light-activated resin composites. Dent Mater 1992; 8 (05) 299-304
- 17 Phaneuf M, Haimeur A, França R. Effect of anaerobic cure of self-etch adhesive on degree of conversion and shear bond strength. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23 (05) 2227-2233
- 18 Akgungor G, Akkayan B, Gaucher H. Influence of ceramic thickness and polymerization mode of a resin luting agent on early bond strength and durability with a lithium disilicate-based ceramic system. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94 (03) 234-241
- 19 Cho SH, Lopez A, Berzins DW, Prasad S, Ahn KW. Effect of different thicknesses of pressable ceramic veneers on polymerization of light-cured and dual-cured resin cements. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (05) 347-352
- 20 Runnacles P, Correr GM, Baratto Filho F, Gonzaga CC, Furuse AY. Degree of conversion of a resin cement light-cured through ceramic veneers of different thicknesses and types. Braz Dent J 2014; 25 (01) 38-42
- 21 Borges LPS, Borges GA, Correr AB. et al. Effect of lithium disilicate ceramic thickness, shade and translucency on transmitted irradiance and knoop microhardness of a light cured luting resin cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2021; 32 (08) 90
- 22 Lührs AK, Pongprueksa P, De Munck J, Geurtsen W, Van Meerbeek B. Curing mode affects bond strength of adhesively luted composite CAD/CAM restorations to dentin. Dent Mater 2014; 30 (03) 281-291
- 23 Favarão J, Oliveira D, Zanini MM, Rocha MG, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti M. Effect of curing-light attenuation on color stability and physical and chemical properties of resin cements containing different photoinitiators. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2021; 113: 104110
- 24 David C, Cuevas-Suárez CE, de Cardoso GC. et al. Characterization of contemporary conventional, bulk-fill, and self-adhesive resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2022; 47 (04) 392-402
- 25 Kitagawa FA, Leite ML, Soares IPM. et al. Influence of ceramic veneer on the transdentinal cytotoxicity, degree of conversion and bond strength of light-cured resin cements to dentin. Dent Mater 2022; 38 (06) e160-e173
- 26 Fouquet V, Dantagnan CA, Abdel-Gawad S, Dursun E, Attal JP, François P. In vitro shear bond strength over zirconia and titanium alloy and degree of conversion of extraoral compared to intraoral self-adhesive resin cements. BDJ Open 2023; 9 (01) 54
- 27 Strazzi Sahyon HB, Chimanski A, Yoshimura HN, Dos Santos PH. Effect of previous photoactivation of the adhesive system on the color stability and mechanical properties of resin components in ceramic laminate veneer luting. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120 (04) 631.e1-631.e6
- 28 Sakano W, Nakajima M, Prasansuttiporn TM, Foxton R, Tagami J. Polymerization behavior within adhesive layer of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives: a micro-Raman spectroscopic study. Dent Mater J 2013; 32: 992-998
- 29 Suh BI. Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004; 16 (05) 316-323
- 30 Endo T, Finger WJ, Hoffmann M, Kanehira M, Komatsu M. The role of oxygen inhibition of a self-etch adhesive on self-cure resin composite bonding. Am J Dent 2007; 20 (03) 157-160
- 31 Takeda M, Takamizawa T, Imai A. et al. Immediate enamel bond strength of universal adhesives to unground and ground surfaces in different etching modes. Eur J Oral Sci 2019; 127 (04) 351-360
- 32 Perdigão J. Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1) dentin adhesion - not there yet. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2020; 56 (01) 190-207