RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1802580
Timing Effect on Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Referral Rates for Newborn Hearing Screening within and after 48 Hours of Birth
Funding The authors declare that they did not receive financial support from agencies in the public, private or non-profit sectors to conduct the present study.

Abstract
Introduction
Newborn hearing screenings must be completed within 48 hours of birth.
Objective
To determine the optimal timing for the first transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) test by comparing the referral rates of infants tested between different time intervals.
Methods
The present study was a retrospective cohort analysis of 2,713 newborns who underwent TEOAE tests between February 2021 and June 2022. The infants were categorized into groups according to the age at which they were tested: 12 to 24 hours, 25 to 36 hours, 37 to 48 hours, and > 48 hours. We compared referral rates across these groups.
Results
The overall referral rate for infants tested within 48 hours from birth was 53%, significantly higher than the rate for those tested after 48 hours (46%, p = 0.001). Notably, the highest referral rates were observed in neonates aged 25 to 36 hours. However, no significant difference in referral rates was found for high-risk infants tested either before or after 48 hours.
Conclusion
Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions can be used to screen newborns' hearing within 48 hours, but the high referral rate suggests that Thailand should add automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) to its guidelines for hearing evaluation if newborns leave the hospital before 48 hours.
Authors' Contributions
CC, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, and writing—original draft. CC and AR, conceptualization, writing—review & editing, and approval of the final manuscript.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 28. Januar 2024
Angenommen: 17. November 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. Juli 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil
Chuan Cheepcharoenrat, Amaraporn Rerkasem. Timing Effect on Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Referral Rates for Newborn Hearing Screening within and after 48 Hours of Birth. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2025; 29: s00451802580.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1802580
-
References
- 1 Poonual W, Navacharoen N, Kangsanarak J, Namwongprom S. Risk factors for hearing loss in infants under universal hearing screening program in Northern Thailand. J Multidiscip Healthc 2015; 9: 1-5
- 2 Wroblewska-Seniuk K, Greczka G, Dabrowski P, Szyfter W, Mazela J. The results of newborn hearing screening by means of transient otoacoustic emissions - has anything changed over 10 years?. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 96: 4-10
- 3 Wenjin W, Xiangrong T, Yun L. et al. Neonatal hearing screening in remote areas of China: a comparison between rural and urban populations. J Int Med Res 2018; 46 (02) 637-651
- 4 Hsu HC, Lee FP, Huang HM. Results of a 1-year government-funded newborn hearing screening program in Taiwan. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (05) 1275-1278
- 5 Pimperton H, Kennedy CR. The impact of early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment on speech and language outcomes. Arch Dis Child 2012; 97 (07) 648-653
- 6 Lieu JE. Speech-language and educational consequences of unilateral hearing loss in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (05) 524-530
- 7 Yoshinaga-Itano C. Benefits of early intervention for children with hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1999; 32 (06) 1089-1102
- 8 Khaimook W, Chayarpham S, Dissaneevate S. The high-risk neonatal hearing screening program in Songklanagarind Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2008; 91 (07) 1038-1042 (In eng)
- 9 Tungvachirakul V, Boonmee S, Nualmoosik T. et al. Newborn hearing screening at Rajavithi Hospital, Thailand: hearing loss in infants not admitting in intensive care unit. J Med Assoc Thai 2011; 94 (Suppl. 02) S108-S112 (In eng)
- 10 Chouyboonchum T, Tiravanitchakul R, Mongkalanatakul N. RPremkraisorn V. Newborn hearing screening in Ramathibodi hospital. Rama Med J 2015; 38 (03) 197-208
- 11 Watkin PM. Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996; 74 (01) F16-F25
- 12 Yousefi J, Ajalloueyan M, Amirsalari S, Hassanali Fard M. The specificity and sensitivity of transient otoacustic emission in neonatal hearing screening compared with diagnostic test of auditory brain stem response in tehran hospitals. Iran J Pediatr 2013; 23 (02) 199-204 (In eng)
- 13 Stein LK. Factors influencing the efficacy of universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatr Clin North Am 1999; 46 (01) 95-105
- 14 American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (04) 898-921
- 15 Lupoli LdaM, Garcia L, Anastasio AR, Fontana AC. Time after birth in relation to failure rate in newborn hearing screening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 77 (06) 932-935
- 16 Maxon AB, White KR, Culpepper B, Vohr BR. Maintaining acceptably low referral rates in TEOAE-based newborn hearing screening programs. J Commun Disord 1997; 30 (06) 457-475
- 17 Smolkin T, Awawdeh S, Blazer S, Mick O, Makhoul IR. Delayed first otoacoustic emissions test decreases failure on neonatal hearing screening after caesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr 2013; 102 (05) e194-e199
- 18 Berninger E, Westling B. Outcome of a universal newborn hearing-screening programme based on multiple transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and clinical brainstem response audiometry. Acta Otolaryngol 2011; 131 (07) 728-739
- 19 Erenberg A, Lemons J, Sia C, Trunkel D, Ziring P. Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention.American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing, 1998- 1999. Pediatrics 1999; 103 (02) 527-530
- 20 Ngui LX, Tang IP, Prepageran N, Lai ZW. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for neonatal hearing screening in a hospital with high delivery rate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 120: 184-188
- 21 Korres SG, Balatsouras DG, Nikolopoulos T, Korres GS, Ferekidis E. Making universal newborn hearing screening a success. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70 (02) 241-246
- 22 De Ceulaer G, Daemers K, Van Driessche K. et al. Neonatal hearing screening with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: a learning curve. Audiology 1999; 38 (06) 296-302
- 23 Farahani F, Hamidi Nahrani M, Seifrabiei MA, Emadi M. The Effect of Mode of Delivery and Hospital Type on Newborn Hearing Screening Results Using Otoacoustic Emissions: Based on Screening Age. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 69 (01) 1-5
- 24 Akinpelu OV, Peleva E, Funnell WR, Daniel SJ. Otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening: a systematic review of the effects of different protocols on test outcomes. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78 (05) 711-717
- 25 Korres S, Nikolopoulos T, Ferekidis E, Gotzamanoglou Z, Georgiou A, Balatsouras DG. Otoacoustic emissions in universal hearing screening: which day after birth should we examine the newborns?. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2003; 65 (04) 199-201
- 26 Madden C, Rutter M, Hilbert L, Greinwald Jr JH, Choo DI. Clinical and audiological features in auditory neuropathy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128 (09) 1026-1030
- 27 Rajadurai VS, Yip WY, Lim JSC. et al. Evolution and expansion of newborn screening programmes in Singapore. Singapore. Med J (Ft Sam Houst, Tex) 2021; 62 (1, Suppl) S26-S35
- 28 Pangkanon S, Charoensiriwatana W, Janejai N, Boonwanich W, Chaisomchit S. Detection of phenylketonuria by the newborn screening program in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2009; 40 (03) 525-529 (In eng)
- 29 Jaruratanasirikul S, Piriyaphan J, Saengkaew T, Janjindamai W, Sriplung H. The etiologies and incidences of congenital hypothyroidism before and after neonatal TSH screening program implementation: a study in southern Thailand. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2018; 31 (06) 609-617
- 30 Gabbard SA, Northern JL, Yoshinaga-Itano C. Hearing screening in newborns under 24 hours of age. Semin Hear 1999; 20 (04) 291-305
- 31 Benito-Orejas JI, Ramírez B, Morais D, Almaraz A, Fernández-Calvo JL. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 72 (08) 1193-1201
- 32 van Dyk M, Swanepoel W, Hall III JW. Outcomes with OAE and AABR screening in the first 48 h–Implications for newborn hearing screening in developing countries. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79 (07) 1034-1040
- 33 Shang Y, Hao W, Gao Z, Xu C, Ru Y, Ni D. An effective compromise between cost and referral rate: A sequential hearing screening protocol using TEOAEs and AABRs for healthy newborns. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 91: 141-145