RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1802559
Testing Patterns and Prevalence of gBRCA Mutations among Women with Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study
Funding None.

Abstract
Introduction Pathogenic germline mutations in BRCA (gBRCAm) genes can heighten the risk of breast cancer (BC) among carriers. Economic constraints and patient testing hesitancy challenge adherence to hereditary germline testing guidelines. As a result, clinicians prioritize hereditary BC screening based on patient willingness, affordability, and therapeutic benefit.
Objectives The objectives of the study were (1) to identify the pattern of hereditary cancer germline testing among women diagnosed with BC and (2) to determine the prevalence of gBRCAm among the women with BC who underwent hereditary cancer germline testing.
Materials and Methods A retrospective study was conducted at a cancer hospital between October 2023 and January 2024. We aimed to assess the germline testing patterns of physicians in our hospital by examining the clinical profile of patients with BC who underwent hereditary cancer multigene (30 gene panel) mutation testing using next-generation sequencing between January 2021 and December 2023. A simultaneous analysis was performed with a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification to detect deletions and duplications in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The classification of the variants as pathogenic and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) was determined by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guideline.
Results Of the 3,600 patients with BC during this study period, only 325 (9%) underwent germline testing. The testing patterns indicated that the median age of those tested was 48.4 years (standard deviation [SD]: 10.1; range: 20–77), 189 patients (58.2%) were younger than 50 years, and 103 patients (31.7%) had a family history of cancer. Family history of BC was reported in 95 (29.2%) patients. Bilateral BC was noted in 19 patients (5.8%), while ovarian cancer was reported in 9 (2.8%) patients. Triple-negative BC (TNBC), hormone receptor–positive BC, and HER2-positive BC were reported in 52, 42.8, and 17.2% patients, respectively. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline BRCA mutations were detected in 48 (14.7%) patients (BRCA1 in 29/325 [8.9%] patients and BRCA2 in 19/325 [5.8%] patients). The highest prevalence was seen among TNBC (36/169, 21.3%) patients. P/LP gBRCAm prevalence among those with and without notable family history was 27/103 (26.2%) and 21/222 (9.5%), respectively; age less than 50 years and greater than 51 years was noted in 32/189 patients (16.9%) and 16/136 (11.8%) patients, respectively. VUS was noted in 29 patients (BRCA1 in 4 patients [8.9%] and BRCA2 in 25 patients).
Conclusions Measures to ensure equitable access to genetic testing can improve testing rates and enhance patient outcomes through personalized care.
Keywords
breast cancer - germline mutation - genetic testing - prevalence - physician practice patterns - IndiaAuthors' Contributions
Study concept and design were developed by S.S.A., R.P., N.H., S.R. Literature search was performed by S.S.A. Data acquisition and data analysis were done by S.S.A. and V.A. Manuscript preparation was done by S.S.A., K.K.M.V., N.A.Y., and V.A. Manuscript editing and manuscript review were done by S.S.A., R.P., N.H., S.R., S.K., R.T., N.A.Y., and C.C.K.N. The manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors. The requirements for authorship have been met. Each author believes that the manuscript represents honest work.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. Februar 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Malvia S, Bagadi SA, Dubey US, Saxena S. Epidemiology of breast cancer in Indian women. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2017; 13 (04) 289-295
- 2 Mehrotra R, Yadav K. Breast cancer in India: present scenario and the challenges ahead. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13 (03) 209-218
- 3 VizHub. GBD Compare. Accessed December 28, 2023 at https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/
- 4 Ramya Sree PR, Thoppil JE. An overview on breast cancer genetics and recent innovations: literature survey. Breast Dis 2021; 40 (03) 143-154
- 5 Larsen MJ, Thomassen M, Gerdes AM, Kruse TA. Hereditary breast cancer: clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2014; 8: 145-155
- 6 Alli E, Sharma VB, Sunderesakumar P, Ford JM. Defective repair of oxidative DNA damage in triple-negative breast cancer confers sensitivity to inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Cancer Res 2009; 69 (08) 3589-3596
- 7 Dwyer M. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines ®) Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic. Accessed June 19, 2024 at: https://www.nccn.org/home/member-
- 8 Hussain SMA. Molecular-based screening and therapeutics of breast and ovarian cancer in low- and middle-income countries. Cancer Res Stat Treat 2020; 3 (01) 81-84
- 9 Tarapara B, Badgujar N, Pandya S, Joshi M, Shah F. An overview of genes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in India. Indian J Gynecol Oncol 2021; 19 (01) 1-12
- 10 Verma A, Julka P, Kaur J. Mutations in BRCA1/2 genes: unexpected higher prevalence in Indian patients. Cancer Res Stat Treat 2020; 3 (02) 376-377
- 11 Al-Sukhun S, Masannat Y, Wegman-Ostrosky T. et al. Germline testing around the globe: challenges in different practice settings. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43: e390522
- 12 Verma A, Nag S, Hasan Q, Selvakumar VPP. Mainstreaming genetic counseling for BRCA testing into oncology clinics - Indian perspective. Indian J Cancer 2019; 56 (Supplement): S38-S47
- 13 Qiagen. QIAamp ® DSP DNA Mini Kit Instructions for Use (Handbook) 50. Venlo, the Netherlands: Qiagen; 2021
- 14 ThermoFisher Scientific. Qubit™ dsDNA HS Assay Kit. Waltham, MA: ThermoFisher Scientific; 2010
- 15 ThermoFisher Scientific. Ion GeneStudio S5 Instrument: User Guide. Waltham, MA: ThermoFisher Scientific; 2018
- 16 ThermoFisher Scientific. Torrent Suite Software 5.10 User Guide (Pub. No. MAN0017598 A.0). Accessed January 14, 2025 at: https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/LSG/manuals/MAN0017598_TorrentSuiteSoftware_5_10_UG.pdf
- 17 Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform 2013; 14 (02) 178-192
- 18 Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S. et al; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015; 17 (05) 405-424
- 19 Mlpa S, Hhai S, Biosystems A, Information A. ME053–A1 BRCA1-BRCA2–RAD51C. 2023 (March).
- 20 Applied Biosystems. Applied Biosystems 3730/3730xl DNA Analyzers User Guide. Waltham, MA: Applied Biosystems; 2007
- 21 Nag S, Arya D, Rajappa SJ. et al. 372P prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation among Indian breast cancer patients: a multicentre cross-sectional study. Ann Oncol 2023; 34: S331
- 22 Kulkarni SS, Nag S, Patra A. et al. Prevalence of germline mutations in women with breast and/or ovarian cancer in a tertiary care center in Pune, India. Int J Mol Immuno Oncol 2023; 8 (02) 65-71
- 23 Mittal A, Deo SVS, Gogia A. et al. Profile of pathogenic mutations and evaluation of germline genetic testing criteria in consecutive breast cancer patients treated at a North Indian tertiary care center. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29 (02) 1423-1432
- 24 Mehta A, Vasudevan S, Sharma SK. et al. Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations and variants of unknown clinical significance associated with breast/ovarian cancer: a report from North India. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10: 6505-6516
- 25 Gogia A, Nithin SG, Pramanik R. et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in an unselected cohort of Indian women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41 (16_suppl): e13004-e13004
- 26 Gupta S, Rajappa S, Advani S. et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among patients with ovarian, primary peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancer in India: a multicenter cross-sectional study. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7 (07) 849-861
- 27 Ghose S, Radhakrishnan V, Bhattacharya S. Ethics of cancer care: beyond biology and medicine. Ecancermedicalscience 2019; 13: 911
- 28 Yip CH, Evans DG, Agarwal G. et al. Global disparities in breast cancer genetics testing, counselling and management. World J Surg 2019; 43 (05) 1264-1270
- 29 Pramanik R, Vats S, Mitra S. et al. Assessment of knowledge and attitude of breast and ovarian cancer patients regarding hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome at a tertiary cancer institute: a cross-sectional observational study. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2024; 45 (01) 28-34
- 30 Mishra A, Deo SVS, Kumar N. et al. A prospective questionnaire-based study evaluating genetic literacy and impact of brief educational intervention among breast cancer patients in a low- to middle-income country. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31 (09) 5911-5918
- 31 Siripurapu I, Maka VV, Majumdar S. et al. 140P A study on assessment of barriers to genetic counselling and testing among breast and ovarian cancer patients in a tertiary referral hospital in India. Ann Oncol 2022; 33: S186
- 32 Ranganathan S, Dee EC, Debnath N, Patel TA, Jain B, Murthy V. Access and barriers to genomic classifiers for breast cancer and prostate cancer in India. Int J Cancer 2024; 154 (08) 1335-1339
- 33 Singh DN, Daripelli S, Elamin Bushara MO, Polevoy GG, Prasanna M. Genetic testing for successful cancer treatment. Cureus 2023; 15 (12) e49889
- 34 Harding R, Salins N, Sharan K, Ekstrand ML. Health literacy in communication, decision-making and outcomes among cancer patients, their families and clinicians in India: a multicentre cross-sectional qualitative study. Psychooncology 2022; 31 (03) 532-540