Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1801792
Microwave Ablation of T1a and T1b Renal Masses: A Retrospective Study
Authors
Funding None.
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of T1a and T1b renal masses, with size ranges between 1.2 and 6.5 cm.
Methods A retrospective review was performed at a single tertiary comprehensive cancer center between June 2019 and June 2023 of 49 consecutive patients (53 total procedures) who underwent MWA for renal masses. The Solero microwave tissue ablation system (Angiodynamics, Latham, NY, United States) was utilized. Patient demographics, renal mass characteristics, and procedural outcomes were collected. Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were utilized to assess renal functional outcomes. Oncologic outcomes were assessed using evidence of local tumor recurrence on contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging, local recurrence-free probability at 1 and 2 years, and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan–Meier analysis.
Results Forty-nine patients (57% males and 43% females) with a median age of 72 years (range, 38–84 years) underwent 53 MWA procedures. The mean renal mass size was 2.8 ± 0.94 cm (range, 1.2–6.5 cm). Most of the renal tumors were T1a. Three of the 53 total renal tumors were larger than 4 cm (T1b) and the remaining 50 were less than 4 cm in size (T1a). The largest tumor that was ablated was 6.5 cm in size. All the patients were placed under general anesthesia (intubated) before the MWA procedure. A median microwave energy of 100 W (range, 60–140 W) was used. The mean duration of the MWA was 3.9 ± 1.5 minutes, with a 100% technical success rate. Four patients (8.2%) experienced complications, two (4.1%) of whom experienced a major complication. There was no clinically significant change in renal function from pre- to postablation on day 1 or at 3 months. Furthermore, local tumor recurrence was observed in three (6.1%) patients at 2.5, 15, and 25 months postablation. Local recurrence-free probability was 98 and 93% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The OS was 98 and 87% at 1 and 2 years, respectively.
Conclusion MWA continues to prove to be an effective technique that can be used to treat small renal masses including oncocytomas, with high technical success, low complication rate, low risk of adverse renal functional outcomes, and encouraging results for sustained tumor control.
Ethical Approval
This is an institutional review board (IRB) approved study that is retrospective in terms of human subjects' regulatory definition. The study is restricted to the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics data. All the authors hereby declare that there are no conflicts of interests to disclose.
Publication History
Article published online:
03 February 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME. et al. Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol 2017; 198 (03) 520-529
- 2 Gala KB, Shetty NS, Patel P, Kulkarni SS. Microwave ablation: how we do it?. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2020; 30 (02) 206-213
- 3 Klapperich ME, Abel EJ, Ziemlewicz TJ. et al. Effect of tumor complexity and technique on efficacy and complications after percutaneous microwave ablation of stage T1a renal cell carcinoma: a single-center, retrospective study. Radiology 2017; 284 (01) 272-280
- 4 Qiu J, Ballantyne C, Yeaman C. et al. Microwave ablation of the T1a small renal mass: expanding beyond 3 cm. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48 (08) 2695-2704
- 5 Wells SA, Wheeler KM, Mithqal A, Patel MS, Brace CL, Schenkman NS. Percutaneous microwave ablation of T1a and T1b renal cell carcinoma: short-term efficacy and complications with emphasis on tumor complexity and single session treatment. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41 (06) 1203-1211
- 6 Sun G, Eisenbrey JR, Smolock AR. et al. Percutaneous microwave ablation versus cryoablation for small renal masses (≤4 cm): 12-year experience at a single center. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35 (06) 865-873
- 7 Ierardi AM, Puliti A, Angileri SA. et al. Microwave ablation of malignant renal tumours: intermediate-term results and usefulness of RENAL and mRENAL scores for predicting outcomes and complications. Med Oncol 2017; 34 (05) 97
- 8 Pandolfo SD, Carbonara U, Beksac AT. et al. Microwave versus cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation for small renal mass: a multicenter comparative analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75 (01) 66-72
- 9 Allen BC, Remer EM. Percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: patient selection, technique, and postprocedural imaging. Radiographics 2010; 30 (04) 887-900
- 10 Mershon JP, Tuong MN, Schenkman NS. Thermal ablation of the small renal mass: a critical analysis of current literature. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2020; 72 (02) 123-134
- 11 Choi SH, Kim JW, Kim JH, Kim KW. Efficacy and safety of microwave ablation for malignant renal tumors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature since 2012. Korean J Radiol 2018; 19 (05) 938-949
- 12 Guo J, Arellano RS. Percutaneous microwave ablation of stage T1b renal cell carcinoma: short-term assessment of technical feasibility, short-term oncologic outcomes, and safety. J Endourol 2020; 34 (10) 1021-1027
- 13 Ito K, Soga S, Seguchi K. et al. Clinical outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small renal cancer. Oncol Lett 2017; 14 (01) 918-924
- 14 Thompson SM, Schmitz JJ, Thompson RH. et al. Introduction of microwave ablation into a renal ablation practice: valuable lessons learned. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211 (06) 1381-1389
- 15 Martin J, Athreya S. Meta-analysis of cryoablation versus microwave ablation for small renal masses: is there a difference in outcome?. Diagn Interv Radiol 2013; 19 (06) 501-507
- 16 Yu J, Liang P, Yu XL. et al. US-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of renal cell carcinoma: intermediate-term results. Radiology 2012; 263 (03) 900-908
- 17 Yu J, Wang H, Cheng ZG. et al. A multicenter 10-year oncologic outcome of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: will it stand the test of time?. Eur Radiol 2022; 32 (01) 89-100

