CC BY 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2025; 60(01): s00441800947
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1800947
Artigo Original

Parafusos transilíaco-transacrais: Qual o comprimento necessário dos implantes para uma adequada fixação percutânea do anel pélvico posterior?

Article in several languages: português | English
1   Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
,
2   Serviço de Radiologia, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
,
1   Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
,
2   Serviço de Radiologia, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
,
1   Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
,
1   Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
› Author Affiliations
Suporte Financeiro Os autores declaram que não receberam suporte financeiro de agências dos setores público, privado ou sem fins lucrativos para a realização deste estudo.

Resumo

Objetivo Cirurgiões ortopédicos brasileiros vivenciam a indisponibilidade de parafusos longos que permitam a fixação percutânea do anel pélvico posterior na configuração transilíaco-transacral (TI-TS). O objetivo do presente estudo é mensurar o comprimento dos corredores ósseos de fixação disponíveis para fixação TI-TS em uma amostra populacional para inferir o comprimento necessário do implante.

Métodos Foram avaliados retrospectivamente pacientes que realizaram tomografia computadorizada (TC), identificando inicialmente a existência de um potencial corredor ósseo de fixação (PCOF) em S1, S2 e S3. Cada PCOF foi medido a partir da cortical externa de um ilíaco até a cortical externa do ilíaco contralateral em imagens axiais de TC.

Resultado A análise compreendeu uma amostra de 180 casos. PCOF em S1 foi identificado em 116 (64,4%) casos, PCOF em S2 foi identificado em 178 (98,9%) casos e PCOF em S3 foi identificado em 16 (8,9%) casos. A mediana (intervalo interquartílico - IIQ) da aferição do PCOF de S1 foi de 153 (148–161) mm, variando de 135 a 179 mm. Em S2, a mediana (IIQ) foi de 136 (131–144) mm, com uma variação de 114 a 160 mm. Em S3, a mediana (IIQ) da medição do PCOF foi de 120,5 (115–126) mm, com uma variação de 110 a 131 mm.

Conclusões Demonstramos que os comprimentos máximos dos corredores ósseos de fixação identificados exigiriam parafusos de até 180 mm de comprimento, com uma clara dissociação entre os valores medidos e os parafusos mais longos atualmente comercializados em nosso meio.

Trabalho desenvolvido no Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.




Publication History

Received: 21 June 2024

Accepted: 02 October 2024

Article published online:
28 April 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

Bibliographical Record
Leonardo Comerlatto, Natália Henz Concatto, Marcus Vinícius Crestani, Tauã Brum Silva, Carlos Roberto Galia, Marco Aurélio Telöken. Parafusos transilíaco-transacrais: Qual o comprimento necessário dos implantes para uma adequada fixação percutânea do anel pélvico posterior? . Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2025; 60: s00441800947.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1800947
 
  • Referências

  • 1 Matta JM, Saucedo T. Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (242) 83-97
  • 2 Routt ML, Meier MC, Kregor PJ, Mayo KA. Percutaneous iliosacral screws with the patient supine technique. Oper Tech Orthop 1993; 3 (01) 35-45
  • 3 Routt Jr ML, Kregor PJ, Simonian PT, Mayo KA. Early results of percutaneous iliosacral screws placed with the patient in the supine position. J Orthop Trauma 1995; 9 (03) 207-214
  • 4 Nork SE, Jones CB, Harding SP, Mirza SK, Routt Jr ML. Percutaneous stabilization of U-shaped sacral fractures using iliosacral screws: technique and early results. J Orthop Trauma 2001; 15 (04) 238-246
  • 5 Calafi LA, Routt Jr ML. Posterior iliac crescent fracture-dislocation: what morphological variations are amenable to iliosacral screw fixation?. Injury 2013; 44 (02) 194-198
  • 6 Saiz Jr AM, Kellam PJ, Amin A. et al. Percutaneous sacral screw fixation alone sufficient for mildly displaced U-type sacral fractures with preserved osseous fixation pathways. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2023;
  • 7 Cintean R, Fritzsche C, Zderic I, Gueorguiev-Rüegg B, Gebhard F, Schütze K. Sacroiliac versus transiliac-transsacral screw osteosynthesis in osteoporotic pelvic fractures: a biomechanical comparison. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023; 49 (06) 2553-2560
  • 8 Bishop JA, Routt Jr ML. Osseous fixation pathways in pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery: osteology, radiology, and clinical applications. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 72 (06) 1502-1509
  • 9 Kaiser SP, Gardner MJ, Liu J, Routt Jr ML, Morshed S. Anatomic Determinants of Sacral Dysmorphism and Implications for Safe Iliosacral Screw Placement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (14) e120
  • 10 Tabaie SA, Bledsoe JG, Moed BR. Biomechanical comparison of standard iliosacral screw fixation to transsacral locked screw fixation in a type C zone II pelvic fracture model. J Orthop Trauma 2013; 27 (09) 521-526
  • 11 Salazar D, Lannon S, Pasternak O. et al. Investigation of bone quality of the first and second sacral segments amongst trauma patients: concerns about iliosacral screw fixation. J Orthop Traumatol 2015; 16 (04) 301-308
  • 12 Gardner MJ, Routt Jr ML. Transiliac-transsacral screws for posterior pelvic stabilization. J Orthop Trauma 2011; 25 (06) 378-384
  • 13 Eastman JG, Shelton TJ, Routt Jr MLC, Adams MR. Posterior pelvic ring bone density with implications for percutaneous screw fixation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2021; 31 (02) 383-389
  • 14 Beaulé PE, Antoniades J, Matta JM. Trans-sacral fixation for failed posterior fixation of the pelvic ring. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006; 126 (01) 49-52
  • 15 Chang G, Fram B, Sobol K, Krieg JC. Two Transiliac-Transsacral Screws in a Single Sacral Level: Surgical Technique and Patient Outcomes. Tech Orthop 2021; 36 (01) 50
  • 16 Lucas JF, Routt Jr ML, Eastman JG. A Useful Preoperative Planning Technique for Transiliac-Transsacral Screws. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31 (01) e25-e31
  • 17 Eastman JG, Adams MR, Frisoli K, Chip Routt Jr ML. Is S3 a Viable Osseous Fixation Pathway?. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32 (02) 93-99
  • 18 Zhao Y, Zhang S, Sun T. et al. Mechanical comparison between lengthened and short sacroiliac screws in sacral fracture fixation: a finite element analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013; 99 (05) 601-606
  • 19 Min KS, Zamorano DP, Wahba GM, Garcia I, Bhatia N, Lee TQ. Comparison of two-transsacral-screw fixation versus triangular osteosynthesis for transforaminal sacral fractures. Orthopedics 2014; 37 (09) e754-e760
  • 20 Chen PH, Chen CY, Lin KC, Hsu CJ. Quantification of the Safe Zone of the First to Third Sacral Segments for Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation in Normal and Dysmorphic Sacra. Orthopedics 2024; 47 (01) e13-e18
  • 21 Jazini E, Klocke N, Tannous O. et al. Does Lumbopelvic Fixation Add Stability? A Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis of an Unstable Pelvic Fracture Model. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31 (01) 37-46
  • 22 Gonçalves RM, Freitas A, Aragão VAD. et al. Comparison of sacroiliac screw techniques for unstable sacroiliac joint disruptions: a finite element model analysis. Injury 2023; 54 (Suppl. 06) 110783
  • 23 Collinge CA, Crist BD. Combined Percutaneous Iliosacral Screw Fixation With Sacroplasty Using Resorbable Calcium Phosphate Cement for Osteoporotic Pelvic Fractures Requiring Surgery. J Orthop Trauma 2016; 30 (06) e217-e222
  • 24 Schultz BJ, Mayer RM, Phelps KD. et al. Assessment of sacral osseous fixation pathways for same-level dual transiliac-transsacral screw insertion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143 (10) 6049-6056
  • 25 Miller AN, Routt Jr ML. Variations in sacral morphology and implications for iliosacral screw fixation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012; 20 (01) 8-16
  • 26 Gardner MJ, Morshed S, Nork SE, Ricci WM, Chip Routt Jr ML. Quantification of the upper and second sacral segment safe zones in normal and dysmorphic sacra. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (10) 622-629
  • 27 Conflitti JM, Graves ML, Chip Routt Jr ML. Radiographic quantification and analysis of dysmorphic upper sacral osseous anatomy and associated iliosacral screw insertions. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (10) 630-636
  • 28 Hwang JS, Reilly MC, Shaath MK. et al. Safe Zone Quantification of the Third Sacral Segment in Normal and Dysmorphic Sacra. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32 (04) 178-182
  • 29 Shaw J, Gary J, Ambrose C, Routt MC. Multidimensional pelvic fluoroscopy: A new and novel technique for assessing safety and accuracy of percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2020; 34 (11) 572-577
  • 30 Warner SJ, Haase DR, Chip Routt ML, Eastman JG, Achor TS. Use of 3D Fluoroscopy to Assist in the Reduction and Fixation of Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures: A Safety and Quality Case Series. J Orthop Trauma 2023; 37 (11S): S1-S6