Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1800819
Correlation between Severity of Malocclusion and Case Complexity Using Dental Aesthetic Index and ABO Discrepancy Index
Authors

Abstract
Objective Dentomaxillary abnormalities manifest clinically as malocclusion. Any deviation from normal occlusion is malocclusion. It presents as a malrelationship between the dental arches in one or more planes or deviation in normal individual tooth positions. The present study was done to assess the association between severity of malocclusion and case complexity using the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) and American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index (ABO-DI).
Material and Methodology The study was conducted on pretreatment orthodontic records of 120 patients who attended the outpatient department of the orthodontics department to assess the association between severity of malocclusion and case complexity using the DAI and the ABO-DI. Pretreatment orthodontic records used for the study were study casts, lateral cephalogram in occlusion, and orthopantomogram. ABO gauge was used for measuring various parameters on study casts.
Result In all, 3.3% patients had minor or no anomaly (DAI score of ≤25), 4.2% patients had definite malocclusion (DAI score of 26–30), 10% patients had severe malocclusion (DAI score of 31–35), 82.5% patients had handicapping malocclusion (DAI score of ≥36). In total, 6.7% patients had mild malocclusion (ABO-DI score of ≤10), 30% patients had moderate malocclusion (ABO-DI score of 11–20), and 63.3% patients had complex malocclusion (ABO-DI score of ≥30).
Conclusion There was a moderate positive correlation between DAI and ABO-DI scores (p = 0.000).
Publication History
Article published online:
05 February 2025
© 2025. European Dental Research and Biomaterials Journal. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Khanal L, Giri J, Gaire H. Epidemiology of malocclusion and assessment of orthodontic treatment needs among BDS students of BPKIHS, Dharan, Nepal. Webmed Central Dentistry 2012; 3 (07) WMC003602
- 2 Nagalakshmi S, James S, Rahila C, Balachandar K, Satish R. Assessment of malocclusion severity and orthodontic treatment needs in 12-15-year-old school children of Namakkal District, Tamil Nadu, using Dental Aesthetic Index. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2017; 35 (03) 188-192
- 3 Figueroa RS, Bancalari C, Velásquez RC, Sanhueza M, Palma C. Prevalence of malocclusion and its psychosocial impact in a sample of Chilean adolescents aged 14 to 18 years old. J Int Dent Med Res 2017; 10 (01) 14-18
- 4 Pyakurel U, Thapaliya KB, Gupta S, Gupta A, Dhakal J. Assessment of clinical cases using ABO discrepancy index. Orthodont J Nepal. 2018; 8 (02) 17-21
- 5 Burgos-Arcega NA, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Morales-Valenzuela AA. et al. Agreement of the discrepancy index obtained using digital and manual techniques: a comparative study. Appl Sci (Basel) 2022; 12 (12) 1-13
- 6 Plaza SP, Aponte CM, Bejarano SR, Martínez YJ, Serna S, Barbosa-Liz DM. Relationship between the Dental Aesthetic Index and Discrepancy Index. J Orthod 2020; 47 (03) 213-222
- 7 Jenny J, Cons NC. Comparing and contrasting two orthodontic indices, the Index of Orthodontic Treatment need and the Dental Aesthetic Index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110 (04) 410-416
- 8 Onyeaso CO, Begole EA. Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131 (02) 248-252
- 9 World Health Organization (WHO). Oral Health Survey: Basic Methods. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997
- 10 Cangialosi TJ, Riolo ML, Owens Jr SE. et al. The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125 (03) 270-278
- 11 Parrish LD, Roberts WE, Maupome G, Stewart KT, Bandy RW, Kula KS. The relationship between the ABO discrepancy index and treatment duration in a graduate orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod 2011; 81 (02) 192-197
- 12 Chauhan D, Sachdev V, Chauhan T, Gupta KK. A study of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment needs according to dental aesthetic index among school children of a hilly state of India. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2013; 3 (01) 32-37
- 13 Poonacha KS, Deshpande SD, Shigli AL. Dental aesthetic index: applicability in Indian population: a retrospective study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2010; 28 (01) 13-17
- 14 Singh A, Purohit B, Sequeira P, Acharya S, Bhat M. Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need measured by the dental aesthetic index and its association with dental caries in Indian schoolchildren. Community Dent Health 2011; 28 (04) 313-316
- 15 John J, Dhinahar S, Reddy PS. Prevalence of malocclusion and treatment needs of 12 year old school children, Chennai using the dental aesthetic index (DAI). J Pierre Fauchard Acad 2011; 25 (01) 14-44
- 16 Schafer SM, Maupome G, Eckert GJ, Roberts WE. Discrepancy index relative to age, sex, and the probability of completing treatment by one resident in a 2-year graduate orthodontics program. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139 (01) 70-73
- 17 Shivakumar KM, Chandu GN, Subba Reddy VV, Shafiulla MD. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment needs among middle and high school children of Davangere city, India by using Dental Aesthetic Index. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2009; 27 (04) 211-218