Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2024; 59(06): e876-e882
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1793825
Artigo Original
Joelho

Efficacy of Genicular Nerve Block in Patients with Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Study with and without Fluoroscopy Assistance

Article in several languages: português | English

Authors

  • Nour Aliman El Majzoub Said

    1   Grupo do Joelho e Artroscopia, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brasil
  • Alexandre Barbieri Mestriner

    1   Grupo do Joelho e Artroscopia, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brasil
  • Heloisa Sungaila

    1   Grupo do Joelho e Artroscopia, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brasil
  • Enzo Salviato Mameri

    1   Grupo do Joelho e Artroscopia, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brasil
  • Carlos Eduardo Silveira Franciozi

    1   Grupo do Joelho e Artroscopia, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brasil
  • Marcelo Seiji Kubota

    1   Grupo do Joelho e Artroscopia, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brasil


Financial Support The authors declare that they did not receive financial support from agencies in the public, private, or non-profit sectors to conduct the present study.
Preview

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of fluoroscopy as an auxiliary method in genicular nerve block (GNB) with block guidance by anatomical parameters, without imaging aid, in reducing pain.

Methods A total of 23 patients underwent fluoroscopy-guided or anatomical parameter-based GNBs. We applied the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities' Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain at 6 time points (preblock, and after 1 hour, 24 hours, 7 days, 28 days, and 90 days).

Results The mean age of the sample was of 64.5 ± 4.8 years, and the mean Body Mass Index (BMI), of 31.4 ± 6.1 Kg/m2; 16 subjects (69.6%) were women. The WOMAC pain subscale showed a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in pain in both groups at all time points. This reduction was greater after 1 hour in both groups, with rates if 64.3% and 64.6% in the fluoroscopy and anatomical parameters groups respectively, with no significant difference. At the end of 90 days, the pain reduction rates were of 35.7% and 44.6% in the fluoroscopy and anatomical parameter groups respectively. The VAS also showed a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in pain in both groups at all times. The reduction was more significant after 1 hour: 78.0% in the fluoroscopy group and 82.2% in the anatomical parameter group, with no significant difference. At the end of 90 days, the pain reduction was of in the fluoroscopy group 36.5% and of 24.6% in the anatomical parameters group.

Conclusion The GNBs guided by fluoroscopy or by anatomical parameters alone were equally effective in terms of magnitude and duration of pain relief.

Work carried out at the Knee and Arthroscopy Group, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.




Publication History

Received: 14 June 2023

Accepted: 14 November 2023

Article published online:
21 December 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil