RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791275
Development of the Parental Expectations and Perspectives Questionnaire in Hindi to Measure the Outcomes from Pediatric Cochlear Implantation
Funding The authors declare that they did not receive financial support from agencies in the public, private, or non-profit sectors to conduct the present study.

Abstract
Introduction The pediatric cochlear implantation (PCI) outcomes, as seen through the parental perspective questionnaire (PPQ), may provide a more comprehensive and accurate view on the functional status of cochlear implant recipients in real-life situations. However, there is no Hindi language version of the PPQ. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to translate and culturally adapt the original PPQ into Hindi to measure the outcomes in children with CI.
Methods The original PPQ was translated into Hindi through a forward-backward process. The questionnaire was content- and face-validated. The harmonized Hindi questionnaire consisted of 74 items covering two domains: decision-making (26 items) and outcomes (48 items). It was piloted in 139 parents of children with CI, to determine the validity and reliability and to measure the outcome of PCI.
Results The PPQ-Hindi version was easy to understand for parents. They reported that the questionnaire completion time was appropriate. The instrument had a high degree of content- and face-validity, and it matched the original. The overall Cronbach α was 0.89, and the test–retest reliability coefficient was 0.92.
Conclusions The PPQ was successfully translated into Hindi and adapted to this specific culture and population, exhibiting a good validity and reliability to measure outcomes in PCI. Thus, the instrument has the potential to be an effective tool for parents to self-administer and to evaluate the effects of CI in their children.
Keywords
hearing impairment - cochlear implant - parental expectation & perspective - questionnaire - outcomes - HindiPublikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 27. Januar 2024
Angenommen: 30. Juni 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Mai 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
Mohammad Shamim Ansari, Arvinder Singh Sood, Satya Prakash Dubey. Development of the Parental Expectations and Perspectives Questionnaire in Hindi to Measure the Outcomes from Pediatric Cochlear Implantation. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2025; 29: s00441791275.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791275
-
References
- 1 Van Naarden Braun K, Christensen D, Doernberg N. et al. Trends in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, intellectual disability, and vision impairment, metropolitan atlanta, 1991-2010. PLoS One 2015; 10 (04) e0124120
- 2 Kim LS, Jeong SW, Lee YM, Kim JS. Cochlear implantation in children. Auris Nasus Larynx 2010; 37 (01) 6-17
- 3 Niparko JK, Tobey EA, Thal DJ. et al; CDaCI Investigative Team. Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation. JAMA 2010; 303 (15) 1498-1506
- 4 Almomani F, Al-Momani MO, Garadat S. et al. Cognitive functioning in Deaf children using Cochlear implants. BMC Pediatr 2021; 21 (01) 71
- 5 Illg A, Haack M, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Büchner A, Lenarz T. Long-term outcomes, education, and occupational level in cochlear implant recipients who were implanted in childhood. Ear Hear 2017; 38 (05) 577-587
- 6 Mahboubi H, Lin HW, Bhattacharyya N. Prevalence, characteristics, and treatment patterns of hearing difficulty in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 144 (01) 65-70
- 7 Zeng FG. Celebrating the one millionth cochlear implant. JASA Express Lett 2022; 2 (07) 077201
- 8 NIDCD and NIH. National institute on deafness and other communication disorders, cochlear implants 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/hearing/pages/coch.aspx
- 9 Kral A, Kronenberger WG, Pisoni DB, O'Donoghue GM. Neurocognitive factors in sensory restoration of early deafness: a connectome model. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15 (06) 610-621
- 10 Archbold SM, Lutman ME, Gregory S, O'Neill C, Nikolopoulos TP. Parents and their deaf child: Three years after cochlear implantation. Deafness Educ Int 2002; 4 (02) 112-120
- 11 O'Neill C, Lutman ME, Archbold SM, Gregory S, Nikolopoulos TP. Parents and their cochlear implanted child: questionnaire development to assess parental views and experiences. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 68 (02) 149-160
- 12 Nunes T, Pretzlik U, Ilicak S. Validation of a parent outcome questionnaire from pediatric cochlear implantation. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2005; 10 (04) 330-356
- 13 Damen GW, Krabbe PF, Archbold SM, Mylanus EA. Evaluation of the Parental Perspective instrument for pediatric cochlear implantation to arrive at a short version. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 71 (03) 425-433
- 14 Huttunen K, Rimmanen S, Vikman S. et al. Parents' views on the quality of life of their children 2-3 years after cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 73 (12) 1786-1794
- 15 Fortunato-Tavares T, Befi-Lopes D, Bento RF, Andrade CR. Children with cochlear implants: communication skills and quality of life. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2012; 78 (01) 15-25
- 16 Stefanini MR, Morettin M, Zabeu JS, Bevilacqua MC, Moret AL. Parental perspectives of children using cochlear implant. CoDAS 2014; 26 (06) 487-493
- 17 Byčkova J, Simonavičienė J, Mickevičienė V, Lesinskas E. Evaluation of quality of life after paediatric cochlear implantation. Acta Med Litu 2018; 25 (03) 173-184
- 18 Molla M, Asha NJ, Kamrujjaman M. Parents perceived quality of life for children with cochlear implants. Int J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 8 (01) 13-24
- 19 Zhao Y, Li Y, Zheng Z. et al. Health-related quality of life in mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2019; 40 (03) 605-614
- 20 Maleki Shahmahmood T, Ebadi A, Rahmani S. et al. Translation and validation of parental perspective questionnaire for children with cochlear implant in persian language. Int J Audiol 2020; 59 (08) 598-605
- 21 Zhumabayev R, Zhumabayeva G, Kapanova G, Tulepbekova N, Akhmetzhan A, Grjibovski A. Quality of life in children with cochlear implants in Kazakhstan. BMC Pediatr 2022; 22 (01) 194
- 22 Danielian M, Danielian A, Harutunyan L, Ishiyama A, Akaragian S. Parental perspectives on the quality of life of children with cochlear implants in Armenia. IJQHC Communications 2023; 3 (01) lyad001
- 23 Anne S, Schwartz SR, McCoy JL, Haberkamp T, Hoffer ME, Chi DH. Cochlear implants in neurologically impaired children: a survey of health-related quality of life. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 165 (05) 731-738
- 24 Brewis B, le Roux T, Schlemmer K, Nauta L, Vinck B. Health-related quality of life in South African children who use cochlear implants. Int J Audiol 2020; 59 (02) 132-139
- 25 Kumar R, Warner-Czyz A, Silver CH, Loy B, Tobey E. American parent perspectives on quality of life in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hear 2015; 36 (02) 269-278
- 26 Hashemi SB, Monshizadeh L. The effect of cochlear implantation in development of intelligence quotient of 6-9 deaf children in comparison with normal hearing children (Iran, 2009-2011). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 76 (06) 802-804
- 27 Hyde M, Punch R, Grimbeek P. Factors predicting functional outcomes of cochlear implants in children. Cochlear Implants Int 2011; 12 (02) 94-104
- 28 Anmyr L, Larsson K, Olsson M. Parents' stress and coping related to children's use of a cochlear implant: A qualitative study. J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil 2016; 15 (02) 150-167
- 29 Vieira SS, Dupas G, Chiari BM. Cochlear implant: the family's perspective. Cochlear Implants Int 2018; 19 (04) 216-224
- 30 World Health Organization. Fact sheet - Addressing the rising prevalence of hearing loss. WHO; 2018
- 31 Social Statistics Division, Government of India. Disabled Persons in India: A statistical profile 2016; 1-107
- 32 Dev AN, Lohith U, Pascal B, Dutt CS, Dutt SN. A questionnaire-based analysis of parental perspectives on pediatric cochlear implant (CI) re/habilitation services: a pilot study from a developing CI service in India. Cochlear Implants Int 2018; 19 (06) 338-349
- 33 Sud P, Munjal SK, Panda N. Challenges faced by Indian parents in raising a child with a cochlear implant - Impact on communication outcomes. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 172: 111695
- 34 Khan S, Rajguru R. Paediatric cochlear implantation outcomes: parental expectations and experiences. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 74 (Suppl. 03) 6468-6476
- 35 Hall DA, Zaragoza Domingo S, Hamdache LZ. et al; International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology and TINnitus Research NETwork. A good practice guide for translating and adapting hearing-related questionnaires for different languages and cultures. Int J Audiol 2018; 57 (03) 161-175
- 36 Bowden A, Fox-Rushby JA. A systematic and critical review of the process of translation and adaptation of generic health-related quality of life measures in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, South America. Soc Sci Med 2003; 57 (07) 1289-1306
- 37 World Health Organization. Collaborative study on substitution therapy of opioid dependence and HIV/AIDS general protocol (version 2.1). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2003
- 38 Liang Y, Lau PW, Huang WY, Maddison R, Baranowski T. Validity and reliability of questionnaires measuring physical activity self-efficacy, enjoyment, social support among Hong Kong Chinese children. Prev Med Rep 2014; 1: 48-52
- 39 Sach TH, Whynes DK. Paediatric cochlear implantation: the views of parents. Int J Audiol 2005; 44 (07) 400-407
- 40 Archbold S, Sach T, O'Neill C, Lutman M, Gregory S. Outcomes from cochlear implantation for child and family: parental perspective. Deafness Educ Int 2008; 10 (03) 120-142