Self-reported Hearing Quality of Life for Adolescent Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Longitudinal Study

Abstract

Background Clinicians are increasingly interested in self-reported hearing-specific quality of life (HQoL) for cochlear implant (CI) recipients, including pediatric CI recipients.

Purpose (1) To compare HQoL of adolescent CI recipients to those of peers with typical hearing (TH); (2) to examine, longitudinally, HQoL for a set of CI recipients; and (3) to determine the effects of child, demographic, audiological, speech perception, and language variables on adolescent HQoL.

Research Design Hearing Environments and Reflections on Quality of Life (HEARQL) questionnaires were completed by children with CIs at elementary (HEARQL-26) and adolescent (HEARQL-28) ages.

Study Sample Eighty CI recipients and 21 children with TH.

Data Collection and Analysis HEARQL-28 scores for the CI and TH groups were compared using nonparametric tests. Regression models were used to examine longitudinal results and to explore predictor variables for adolescent CI participants' HEARQL-28 scores.

Results HEARQL-28 scores for CI participants were lower than those of peers with TH. For both CI and TH adolescents, the HEARQL subscale with the lowest score is “Hearing Situations.” CI participants' HEARQL scores at elementary age were not significantly correlated with scores at adolescence. Over 70% of unexplained variance remains even after inclusion of variables with established contributions to traditional CI benefit.

Conclusions Self-reported HEARQL scores are largely unexplained for pediatric CI recipients; multidisciplinary explorations of other sources of variance, such as social, emotional, and psychosocial factors, should be pursued.

Keywords

cochlear implants - self-reported hearing QoL - adolescents - hearing loss

Previous Presentation

This work was presented at the European Symposium on Pediatric Cochlear Implantation in Rotterdam, Denmark on June 3, 2023.

Publication History

Received: 28 October 2023

Accepted: 12 February 2024

Article published online:
19 December 2024

• References

• 1 Lin FR, Niparko JK. Measuring health-related quality of life after pediatric cochlear implantation: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70 (10) 1695-1706
• 2 Roland L, Fischer C, Tran K, Rachakonda T, Kallogjeri D, Lieu JE. Quality of life in children with hearing impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 155 (02) 208-219
• 3 Suneel D, Davidson LS, Lieu J. Self-reported hearing quality of life measures in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with bilateral input. Cochlear Implants Int 2020; 21 (02) 83-91
• 4 Umansky AM, Jeffe DB, Lieu JEC. The HEAR-QL: quality of life questionnaire for children with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2011; 22 (10) 644-653
• 5 Moberly AC, Harris MS, Boyce L. et al. Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: are we measuring the right things?. Laryngoscope 2018; 128 (04) 959-966
• 6 Schorr EA, Roth FP, Fox NA. Quality of life for children with cochlear implants: perceived benefits and problems and the perception of single words and emotional sounds. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2009; 52 (01) 141-152
• 7 Rachakonda T, Jeffe DB, Shin JJ. et al. Validity, discriminative ability, and reliability of the hearing-related quality of life questionnaire for adolescents. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (02) 570-578
• 8 Cejas I, Barker DH, Petruzzello E, Sarangoulis CM, Quittner AL. Cochlear implantation and educational and quality-of-life outcomes in adolescence. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149 (08) 708-715
• 9 Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 4th ed. (WISC-IV). Pearson; 2003
• 10 Wechsler D. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, 2nd ed. (WASI-II). NCS Pearson; 2011
• 11 Peterson GE, Lehiste I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord 1962; 27 (01) 62-70
• 12 Bamford J, Wilson I. Methodological considerations and practical aspects of the BKB sentence lists. In: Bench J, Bamford JM. eds. Speech-Hearing Tests and The Spoken Language of Hearing Impaired Children. Academic Press; 1979
• 13 Carrow-Woolfolk E. CASL-2: Comprehensive assessment of spoken language, Second Edition. Pearson: Western Psychological Services; 2017
• 14 Galvin KL, Noble W. Adaptation of the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale for use with children, parents, and teachers. Cochlear Implants Int 2013; 14 (03) 135-141
• 15 Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Osberger MJ. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995; 16 (05) 470-481
• 16 Geers AE, Davidson LS, Uchanski RM, Nicholas JG. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (05) 562-574
• 17 Semel EM, Wiig EH, Secord W. CELF-4 Screening: Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Screening Test, 4th ed. Pearson, PsychCorp; 2004
• 18 Dettman SJ, Dowell RC, Choo D. et al. Long-term communication outcomes for children receiving cochlear implants younger than 12 months: a multicenter study. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (02) e82-e95
• 19 Geers AE. Factors influencing spoken language outcomes in children following early cochlear implantation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 64: 50-65
• 20 Nicholas JG, Geers AE. Effect of age of cochlear implantation on receptive and expressive spoken language in 3-year-old deaf children. Int Congr Ser 2004; 1273: 340-343