RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791195
Penile Reconstruction with Radial Forearm Free Flap—Present State of the Art

Abstract
Background Patients with congenital or acquired penile defects face significant psychological trauma. Various methods for penile reconstruction have been described of which the free radial artery forearm flap using the tube-within-tube design is found to be the most commonly used. We have assimilated the best practices described at different times in our bid to standardize the technique and have strived to make it reproducible. The reconstructed phalluses with this method can withstand the test of time, allowing the patients to lead a normal life.
Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective review of the past 16 years and collected data for all radial forearm free flap phalloplasties. We have modified the design originally described by Biemer. The urethra is kept 1 cm longer than the shaft and the proximal 5 mm of the prospective urethra is not sutured to allow for spatulation of the urethral anastomosis.
Results A total of nine patients were included out of which six patients had congenital malformations, two had traumatic injuries, and one had penile carcinoma. Six out of the nine patients had implants placed which were wrapped in fascia lata graft. One of these patients experienced displacement of the implant which needed to be repositioned. Three patients faced postoperative complications. All patients had tactile and erogenous sensation at the tip of the glans at the end of 1 year and all patients could micturate while standing. One patient's esthetic and functional outcome was compromised. One of the married patients has fathered a child through normal sexual intercourse.
Conclusion Radial forearm phalloplasty done by this technique allows us to achieve consistently stable functional and esthetic outcomes. We firmly believe that this standardized protocol for penile reconstruction could be of great benefit to patients as well as to the treating reconstructive surgeon in their quest to achieve a completely rehabilitated patient.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
26. September 2024
© 2024. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Harrison RJ. Congenital absence of the penis with embryological considerations. Br J Plast Surg 1948; 1 (01) 12-28
- 2 Bogoras N. Uber die volle plastische Wiederherstellung eines zum Koitus fahigen Penis (Peniplastica totalis). Zentralbl Chir 1936; 22: 1271-1276
- 3 Garaffa G, Christopher NA, Ralph DJ. Total phallic reconstruction in female-to-male transsexuals. Eur Urol 2010; 57 (04) 715-722
- 4 Garaffa G, Ralph DJ, Christopher N. Total urethral construction with the radial artery-based forearm free flap in the transsexual. BJU Int 2010; 106 (08) 1206-1210
- 5 Heston AL, Esmonde NO, Dugi III DD, Berli JU. Phalloplasty: techniques and outcomes. Transl Androl Urol 2019; 8 (03) 254-265
- 6 Hage JJ, Bloem JJ, Bouman FG. Obtaining rigidity in the neophallus of female-to-male transsexuals: a review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg 1993; 30 (04) 327-333
- 7 Levine LA, Zachary LS, Gottlieb LJ. Prosthesis placement after total phallic reconstruction. J Urol 1993; 149 (03) 593-598
- 8 Puckett CL, Montie JE. Construction of male genitalia in the transsexual, using a tubed groin flap for the penis and a hydraulic inflation device. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61 (04) 523-530
- 9 Young EE, Friedlander D, Lue K. et al. Sexual function and quality of life before and after penile prosthesis implantation following radial forearm flap phalloplasty. Urology 2017; 104: 204-208
- 10 Burnett AL. Fascia lata in penile reconstructive surgery: a reappraisal of the fascia lata graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (04) 1061-1067
- 11 Hu W, Lu J, Zhang L. et al. A preliminary report of penile transplantation. Eur Urol 2006; 50 (04) 851-853
- 12 Bateman C. World's first successful penis transplant at Tygerberg Hospital. S Afr Med J 2015; 105 (04) 251-252
- 13 Cetrulo Jr CL, Li K, Salinas HM. et al. Penis transplantation: first US experience. Ann Surg 2018; 267 (05) 983-988
- 14 Biemer E. Penile construction by the radial arm flap. Clin Plast Surg 1988; 15 (03) 425-430
- 15 Monstrey S, Hoebeke P, Selvaggi G. et al. Penile reconstruction: is the radial forearm flap really the standard technique?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (02) 510-518
- 16 Monstrey S, Hoebeke P, Dhont M. et al. Radial forearm phalloplasty: a review of 81 cases. Eur J Plast Surg 2005; 28: 206-212
- 17 Jani K, Maharaja N, Akali NR. et al. Long-term patient-reported outcomes of radial forearm free flap donor site in the context of head and neck cancer reconstruction. Indian J Surg Oncol 2020; 11 (02) 192-195
- 18 Butler DP, Plonczak AM, Reissis D. et al. Factors that predict deep inferior epigastric perforator flap donor site hernia and bulge. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2018; 52 (06) 338-342
- 19 Kozacioglu Z, Kiray A, Ergur I, Zeybek G, Degirmenci T, Gunlusoy B. Anatomy of the dorsal nerve of the penis, clinical implications. Urology 2014; 83 (01) 121-124
- 20 Weech D, Ameer MA, Ashurst JV. Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis, penis dorsal nerve. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023
- 21 Morrison SD, Shakir A, Vyas KS, Kirby J, Crane CN, Lee GK. Phalloplasty: a review of techniques and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (03) 594-615