Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2025; 38(03): 111-118
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1790511
Original Research

Modified Cranial Closing Wedge Osteotomy (AMA-Based CCWO) to Treat Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficient Stifle in 204 Dogs Over 50 Kg: Magnitude of the Craniocaudal Angulation of the Proximal Tibia and Rate of Surgical Site Infection

Laurent Guénégo
1   Clinique Vétérinaire du Vernet, Le Vernet, France
,
2   Clinica Veterinaria Vezzoni, Cremona, Italy
,
Luca Vezzoni
2   Clinica Veterinaria Vezzoni, Cremona, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this retrospective study was to report the magnitude of the craniocaudal angulation of the proximal tibia (CCAPT) quantified by the angle between the anatomical axis (AA) and the mechanical axis (MA), called the AMA angle, and the tibial plateau angle (TPA) in dogs >50 kg that were treated by cranial closing wedge osteotomy based on the AMA angle (AMA-based CCWO). Furthermore, the percentage of dogs in which the AA and MA could be aligned postoperatively and the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) were reported.

Study Design Medical records (between January 2016 and September 2023) were reviewed for 204 dogs that had AMA-based CCWO stabilized with a double locking plate (DLP) fixation with or without joint exploration plus a Robert Jones bandage (RJB) and were given postoperative antibiotics.

Results The median (range) preoperative AMA angle and TPA were 3.1° (0–5.1°) and 30° (22–49.6°), respectively, and the postoperative AMA angle and TPA were 0° (−2.4 to 1.6°) and 9.2° (4–15°), respectively. The AA and MA were aligned in 82% of dogs. Grade 4 healing occurred in all osteotomies by 8 weeks postoperatively. Except for one dog, no SSIs were recorded.

Conclusion Concerning the magnitude of CCAPT in dogs >50 kg and the low SSI rate, AMA-based CCWO stabilized with a DLP fixation plus an RJB and postoperative antibiotics should be considered for treating cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifles in this subset of dogs.

Authors' Contribution

L.G. contributed to the conception and design of the study, data analysis, and data interpretation. A.V. and L.V. contributed to data analysis, data interpretation, and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors contributed to drafting and revision of the manuscript and approved the final version.




Publication History

Received: 01 December 2023

Accepted: 14 August 2024

Article published online:
10 September 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany